Latest revision |
Your text |
Line 38: |
Line 38: |
| :::::I made {{tem|id}} btw --{{User:Porplemontage/sig}} 21:22, December 23, 2024 (EST) | | :::::I made {{tem|id}} btw --{{User:Porplemontage/sig}} 21:22, December 23, 2024 (EST) |
| ::::::Oh, okay then. Nevermind! [[User:Altendo|Al]][[User talk:Altendo|ten]][[Special:Contributions/Altendo|do]] 22:00, December 23, 2024 (EST) | | ::::::Oh, okay then. Nevermind! [[User:Altendo|Al]][[User talk:Altendo|ten]][[Special:Contributions/Altendo|do]] 22:00, December 23, 2024 (EST) |
|
| |
| == Curators ==
| |
| Note that I am keeping rule 19 in mind, so this is more of a title, similar to but different than autoconfirmed. However, I do wonder what others think about the idea of a Curators title: Basically, non-staff members who are more experienced at handling content on the wiki so that newer users can notice some of the more established and recurring editors on this wiki. Because I've noticed non-staff members do large-scale projects on the wiki, but at the same time it feels there's more scrutiny toward newer users who attempt it. If the idea is approved, "Curators" could be a precedent to perhaps establish more titles based on a user's niches on the wiki.
| |
|
| |
| On a side note, I wondered if there could be more clarity or distinction with non-staff who are formally authorized to give warnings on user talk pages. [[User:Super Mario RPG|Super Mario RPG]] ([[User talk:Super Mario RPG|talk]]) 09:49, March 21, 2025 (EDT)
| |
| :This seems like it'd bring more confusion if anything. If editors want to discuss their niches, they can mention them on their user pages. Adding more roles just overcomplicates things. I also have no trouble noticing non-staff active users - I'm sure many others feel the same. And what do you mean by more "scrutiny"? This whole idea could just make new editors more intimidated to try larger projects. [[User:Technetium|Technetium]] ([[User talk:Technetium|talk]]) 10:01, March 21, 2025 (EDT)
| |
| ::Do we want newer users to try large projects? I got warned before for making sweeping changes. [[User:Super Mario RPG|Super Mario RPG]] ([[User talk:Super Mario RPG|talk]]) 10:04, March 21, 2025 (EDT)
| |
| :::Considering people have apparently had grievances with projects I've attempted, I can say that "newness" has nothing to do with it in the long run. [[User:Doc von Schmeltwick|Doc von Schmeltwick]] ([[User talk:Doc von Schmeltwick|talk]]) 10:07, March 21, 2025 (EDT)
| |
| :I feel strongly that we should not discourage new users from contributing, even with large-scale edits; and that creating a higher class of user that is "allowed" to do large-scale editing projects would be a huge mistake. [[User:Ahemtoday|Ahemtoday]] ([[User talk:Ahemtoday|talk]]) 13:01, March 21, 2025 (EDT)
| |
| ::Hard agree. This would create a big barrier for new users to get involved with the wiki. {{User:Pseudo/sig}} 13:07, March 21, 2025 (EDT)
| |
| :::It's also just unclear what counts as a "large-scale change". Consider the work we did on ''[[Wario Blast: Featuring Bomberman!]]'', which basically doubled in size from the start of the year to now. But at what point did it hit "large scale"? Was it adding tables? Adding sample level maps to the zone pages? Adding basically double the amount of sprites and screenshots? What would you do after awhile? Do you just revert to a halfway implemented state and say, "come back when you're a Curator"? Do you revert it all? Do you permit it only if the edits were made incrementally, negating the point of being Curator if you just pace yourself? Even if the point is for somebody to check large-scale edits, that's part of why we have Patrollers, which is a much healthier system for that purpose. {{User:Camwoodstock/sig}} 13:31, March 21, 2025 (EDT)
| |
| ::::Okay, so I'll remove the talk template since there's enough feedback not in favor of it. [[User:Super Mario RPG|Super Mario RPG]] ([[User talk:Super Mario RPG|talk]]) 13:41, March 21, 2025 (EDT)
| |
|
| |
| == Archive ==
| |
| I am currently working on 2025's April Fool's Day archive page for BJAODN. Just thought I should probably mention this somewhere. [[User:Nelsonic|Nelsonic]] ([[User talk:Nelsonic|talk]]) 20:04, April 1, 2025 (EDT)
| |
|
| |
| == Dark mode issues ==
| |
|
| |
| Trying to enter this page on dark mode and it seems like this page was not configured for dark mode properly, as it is hurting my eyes.
| |
|
| |
| Can someone please address this? Thanks. {{User:PanchamBro/sig}} 01:13, April 2, 2025 (EDT)
| |
| :How does it look on your end? On mine, it looks like any other page in dark mode, with the only thing that's annoyingly bright being the image at the top. [[User:Doc von Schmeltwick|Doc von Schmeltwick]] ([[User talk:Doc von Schmeltwick|talk]]) 02:08, April 2, 2025 (EDT)
| |
| :Judging by a Discord message they sent, this seems to be an issue exclusive to the Vector site skin, where the light mode background pattern will appear on darkmode. On MonoBook (the site default), though, the light mode's background pattern is disabled. {{User:Camwoodstock/sig}} 02:18, April 2, 2025 (EDT)
| |