View source for MarioWiki:Proposals/Archive/60

{{MarioWiki:Proposals/Archive/Template|current=yes}}

<div style="font-size:95%">__TOC__</div>

===Split the WFC information box for Mario Kart courses===
{{ProposalOutcome|passed|2-6|Rename WFC section and unlink it from the WFC page}}
On every page for race courses and battle arenas in the Mario Kart series, there is an info box with some minor information about the course such as what games it has appeared in, what are the staff ghosts, etc. One of those sections is simply referred to as WFC, which stands for and links to the page for Nintendo Wi-Fi Connection, which has the information on whether the track is still playable online or not depending on what game it is, such as saying the online is no longer available for [[Toad's Factory]] since WFC shut down so Mario Kart Wii is no longer officially playable online. However, as this may be fine when referring to Mario Kart DS and Mario Kart Wii, Mario Kart 7 and 8 use Nintendo Network and Mario Kart 8 Deluxe uses Nintendo Switch Online which doesn't work well for this section because WFC links directly to the Nintendo Wi-Fi Connection page and not Nintendo Network for Mario Kart 7 and 8 and Nintendo Switch Online for Mario Kart 8 Deluxe. Because of this, I am proposing to split this section to add NN and NSO sections for Mario Kart 7, 8, and 8 Deluxe so it links the user to the correct page and not just the outdated WFC, I am also offering another alternative where is will not be split but renamed to simply 'Online Play' and unlinked from the WFC page and then add Mario Kart Tour's online status since Tour uses a generic service that doesn't use any of the aforementioned services but I feel more people will lean towards renaming the section to 'Online Play'.

'''Proposer''': {{User|Skipper93653}}<br>
'''Deadline''': October 9, 2022, 23:59 GMT

====Split section into WFC (for Nintendo Wi-Fi Connection on Wii and DS), NN (for Nintendo Network on 3DS and Wii U), and NSO (for Nintendo Switch Online on Switch)====
#{{User|Skipper93653}} Per proposal. I am equally for either splitting or renaming to Online Play.
#{{User|MightyMario}} This seems like the best option to go with.

====Rename WFC section to simply 'Online Play' and unlink it from the WFC page====
#{{User|Skipper93653}} Per proposal. I am equally for either renaming to Online Play or splitting.
#{{User|RealStuffMister}} per my comment. <s>if there was an option to simply remove the link and rename to "Wi-Fi", then i'd put that.</s> after "[[User:RealStuffMister/Los_Angeles_Laps|experimenting]]", the length of "Online play" shouldn't be an issue.
#{{User|Hewer}} Per all.
#{{User|RHG1951}} Per all.
#{{User|Killer Moth}} Per all.
#{{User|ThePowerPlayer}} Per all.

====Keep as-is====

====Comments====
The "WFC" section ([https://www.mariowiki.com/index.php?title=Template%3ARace_course_infobox&type=revision&diff=3689872&oldid=3652673 which used to be called "Wi-Fi"]) was actually intended to only be for MKWii and MKDS courses, as specified on the page for the race course template. I guess people started putting info for MK7, MK8 and MK8D on there and no one thought to remove them. However;
* If there are sections for each individual console, '''that would result in there being many sections all with roughly the same info on.''' Take [[Wii Coconut Mall|Coconut Mall]] for example, that course was in Mario Kart Wii, Mario Kart 7 and now Mario Kart 8 Deluxe. That would mean it needs three sections, one for WFC, one for NN and one for NSO, all of which say the exact same thing; "Available". Of course that means the infobox becomes too big (the reason why the Tours section received a [Show] [Hide] system) and also too repetitive.
* However, I am not too sure if "online play" has any '''undesired side effects because of its length''', "WFC" and "Wi-Fi" are short, like the other headings, so im not sure if "Online play" will cause any issues because of that. 

Honestly, I think the best thing to do is to revert it back to "Wi-Fi" and remove the link to WFC, because "Wi-Fi" can refer to all online play, not just WFC. It also makes it not be repetitive, and means we won't have to go through all 127 (yes i counted) courses with it listed, when there is a much easier, more obvious, solution) {{User:RealStuffMister/sig}} 10:52, October 2, 2022 (EDT)

It should be noted that ''[[Mario Kart Tour]]'' also has online multiplayer as of March 8, 2020 (although Gold Pass users were able to betatest it from December 18, 2019, to December 26, 2019, as well as from January 22, 2020, to January 28, 2020). I believe that courses in Tour would also have to be implemented in the Online Play section, though with some specific details that showcases ''which'' Tours they're available in as of which date (considering the overall course selection rotates every two weeks). Now, for Coconut Mall, this can be as simple as saying "Available" and then refer to the "Tours" section earlier in the infobox, but it's probably a bit more difficult for courses that have been in the game since launch, ''before'' multiplayer was added, such as [[3DS Toad Circuit]], which would have to refer to the Tours section above as well, but ''also'' specify that it's only possible since [[Trick Tour (2020)]]. And that's not even accounting the courses that were available during the Gold Pass-only betatests, such as [[N64 Kalimari Desert]], which has online play since the [[Baby Rosalina Tour]], but was ''also'' available for the first week of the [[Holiday Tour (2019)]] ''and'' the second week of the [[Ice Tour]]. Now we could do it simple and ''only'' have to say "Available" concerning Tour, but it might not be entirely accurate due to the bi-weekly rotation ''and'' the fact that Tour didn't initially launch with multiplayer (plus the two beta tests before the official multiplayer launch). We cannot split it into its own section either, because Tour doesn't ''have'' a special branding for the online service it's using, unlike DS/Wii, 7/8 or 8 Deluxe, so I feel keeping these all merged into an "Online Play" section would still be the better option. {{User:Arend/sig}} 12:42, October 2, 2022 (EDT)

===Remove "Koopa" and other name particles from Koopaling article titles===
{{ProposalOutcome|failed|7-7-13|Do not rename the articles}}
Starting with ''Mario Kart 8'' on Wii U hitherto the time of this proposal, Mario games have exclusively referred to Koopalings using their first names: [[Larry Koopa|Larry]], [[Ludwig von Koopa|Ludwig]], [[Wendy O. Koopa|Wendy]] etc. These games include ''Paper Mario: Color Splash'', ''Mario & Luigi'' games, ''Mario Kart Tour'', ''Dr. Mario World'', ''Super Smash Bros.'' games, and ''Mario & Sonic'' games (Rio 2016; Tokyo 2020).

The Koopaling article names on this wiki do not reflect this state of affairs: currently, they use the naming scheme established in old manuals, which is stylised by way of the word "Koopa" attached as a surname or nobiliary title of sorts. Said naming scheme has seen sparse use in more recent years, being specifically reserved to ancillary material such as the ''New Super Mario Bros. Wii'' Prima Guide, this [https://youtu.be/De9Z11mLo_A?t=105 video], and most likely more--I invite knowledgeable editors to expand this list for future reference. As dictated by [[MarioWiki:Naming#Acceptable sources for naming|the source priority policy]], this material should not override what the games themselves put forward. In addition, the more concise versions of these characters' names would better serve readers and contributors alike.

Given my statement above, the object of this proposal is to simply change Koopaling articles, and most pages directly related to the individual characters, to display only their first name. The page [[List of DIC cartoon episodes featuring Hip Koopa]] is excluded from the proposal's scope, as its title reflects the character's name used in the SMB3 cartoon. The following is a list of affected pages, with target titles in brackets:
{|
|-
|
*[[Larry Koopa]] ("Larry")
*[[Roy Koopa]] ("Roy")
*[[Wendy O. Koopa]] ("Wendy")
*[[Lemmy Koopa]] ("Lemmy")
*[[Morton Koopa Jr.]] ("Morton")
*[[Ludwig von Koopa]] ("Ludwig")
*[[Iggy Koopa]] ("Iggy")
|
*[[List of Larry Koopa profiles and statistics]] ("List of Larry profiles and statistics")
*[[List of Roy Koopa profiles and statistics]] ("List of Roy profiles and statistics")
*[[List of Wendy O. Koopa profiles and statistics]] ("List of Wendy profiles and statistics")
*[[List of Lemmy Koopa profiles and statistics]] ("List of Lemmy profiles and statistics")
*[[List of Morton Koopa Jr. profiles and statistics]] ("List of Morton profiles and statistics")
*[[List of Ludwig von Koopa profiles and statistics]] ("List of Ludwig profiles and statistics")
*[[List of Iggy Koopa profiles and statistics]] ("List of Iggy profiles and statistics")
|}

I would also like us to hash out how to phrase the opening paragraphs in their character articles; namely, whether to list the short name or the full name first. For this, I'm splitting the support option into two possible directions:
#"<u>'''Larry''', referred to in full as '''Larry Koopa'''</u> and known as '''Cheatsy Koopa''' in the cartoons, [...]"
#"<u>'''Larry Koopa''', or simply '''Larry'''</u>, known as '''Cheatsy Koopa''' in the cartoons, [...]"

I suppose some editors may prefer the second direction, given that it's common practice in academic and academically-modeled resources to start out an article's text with the subject's full name, and not necessarily the best known version of the name.

'''Proposer''': {{User|Koopa con Carne}}<br>
'''Deadline''': <s>September 25, 2022, 23:59 GMT Extended to October 2, 2022, 23:59 GMT Extended to October 9, 2022, 23:59 GMT</s> Extended to October 16, 2022, 23:59 GMT

====Support (option 1)====
#{{User|Koopa con Carne}} Preferred option. Can't wait to make it easier to type out the names of these roster-padding sons of bitches.
#{{User|Spectrogram}} Per con Carne's proposal :)
#{{user|WildWario}} Per proposal.
#{{User|Hewer}} After some thought, per all and per the support voters [[Talk:Koopalings#Move_all_Koopaling_articles_to_just_their_first_names|here]].
#{{User|Platform}} - Per all.
#{{User|LinkTheLefty}} Strongly per "most commonly used English name" which has been the basis every single time this comes up (I would say "List of DIC cartoon episodes featuring Hip" too since I distinctly remember lines using his first name, but I'm not about to bingewatch to confirm if full name or first only is more common there).
#{{User|BubbleRevolution}} Per all, given that the "Koopa" parts of their names are not as frequently used. By the same logic, shouldn't Bowser's page be called "King Bowser Koopa" or Mario's page be called "Mario Mario"?


<del>{{user|Doc von Schmeltwick}} - Full_name parameter exists for a reason and the full names are rarely used, unlike say [[Kammy Koopa]], who is referred to pretty much only as such.</del> Switching to other option, same reasoning applies<br>
<del>{{User|Tails777}} Honestly, either wording works for me, but could be best to roll with their first names only to match article titles.</del>

====Support (option 2)====
#{{User|Hewer}} Second choice.
#{{User|ThePowerPlayer}} I'm surprised no one has voted for the second support option; changing mentions of the Koopalings to just their first names would improve reader and editor convenience, while using their full names as the very first words of each of their articles would help make their full name immediately clear (and help clarify that the article {{fake link|Roy}} refers to Roy Koopa, not [[Roy (Fire Emblem)|Roy from ''Fire Emblem'']] or [[Roy (Mario Tennis: Power Tour)|Roy from ''Mario Tennis: Power Tour'']]). This option makes sense to me because their full names are still commonly used, unlike [[Mario|Mario Mario]], [[Princess Peach|Princess Peach Toadstool]], and [[Yoshi|T. Yoshisaur Munchakoopas]]. Additionally, it sets both an academic, professional standard and the standard already set by the edge cases of characters with intentionally long full names, like [[Squirps]] and [[The Old Psychic Lady]].
#{{User|LinkTheLefty}} My preference would be an approach closer to this (also considering that the given full names are subject to modification, especially in old western media appearances).
#{{user|Doc von Schmeltwick}} - Per
#{{user|Blinker}} Per all. (Professor E. Gadd on a similar boat?)
#{{User|Somethingone}} Per all.
#{{User|Tails777}} Per all

====Oppose====
#{{User|Waluigi Time}} Per Mister Wu in the comments and the [[Talk:Koopalings#Move_all_Koopaling_articles_to_just_their_first_names|previous proposal over this]]. The names are still sometimes used in-game with recent examples, and this largely seems to stem from the extended names just not being used in Japan. (You could bring in the "it's closer to Japanese" argument, but I don't really like the idea of using that to decide which English names should be used.)
#{{User|Killer Moth}} Per Waluigi Time. These names are still used quite frequently and don't need to be changed.
#{{User|Swallow}} I would agree with not referring to them by the full names for games that don't use them at all, otherwise per all.
#{{User|SmokedChili}} If the full names had been completely out of use after the first appearance or so like [[Boo Diddly]], I would have supported this. And then there's few Koopa characters like [[Kylie Koopa]] whose first name was used in her follow-up appearance. I don't know the reason for Smash Bros. fighters having articles under their full names if they have any, but when I see an example like [[Wolf]] and [[Wolf O'Donnell]], using full names looks valid enough and better over identifiers (like this).
#{{User|Wikiboy10}} Per Waluigi Time, the names are still used on occasion enough compared to [[Princess Peach|Princess Peach Toadstool]].
#{{User|RealStuffMister}} Per waluigi time
#{{User|MrConcreteDonkey}} - Really struggle to see any advantage to this. If the full names are still in use and there's no official confirmation they've been dropped, what's the point? How does typing "Koopa" on the end of the name, on the rare occasions you need to, waste any time at all? Also both example sentences provided for the support option are far more awkwardly worded than what's currently there.
#{{User|Bazooka Mario}} Until someone can elaborate on why policy discourages linking to redirects, I don't see the need to rename well-established names to simpler names that I feel were simplified for game-context reasons that aren't necessarily applicable to wikis.
#{{User|Sdman213}} Per all.
#{{User|Mario4Ever}} Per all.
#{{User|Arend}} Per all.
#{{User|Power Flotzo}} Per all.
#{{User|TheFlameChomp}} Per all.

====Comments====
I'd like to remind yet again that in ''Super Smash Bros. Ultimate'' [https://youtu.be/9HEisHGO1bk the full names are all acknowledged] - they also were acknowledged in the Wii U version of ''Mario & Sonic at the Rio 2016 Olympic Games'' that featured the ''Theme of Larry Koopa''.<s> Also, please, proposal votes based on personal hatred do no good to the wiki, especially since the only multi slot roster "padding" the Koopalings did since ''Mario Kart 8'' and its Deluxe version was in the now defunct ''Dr. Mario World'' and in ''Mario Kart Tour'' (where it's pretty bold to compare it to the actual padding of the variants). They share the slot with Bowser Jr. in the ''Smash Bros.'' games and they are guests in the ''Mario & Sonic'' games, meaning that they only occupy one slot.</s>--[[User:Mister Wu|Mister Wu]] ([[User talk:Mister Wu|talk]]) 15:31, September 18, 2022 (EDT)
:Considering the tone of my statement of disdain and the fact that I added it at the tail end of a series of arguments made in good faith, I would say that it is very clearly meant to be taken as a joke. I have no strong attachments towards any video game characters, so your accusation that I'm using "hatred" as a thrust to my argument is not only insulting, but blown out of proportion. {{User:Koopa con Carne/Sig}} 19:10, September 18, 2022 (EDT)
::Fine, I take that part back (although just so you know, fan votes have been a thing in the past, so be wary that some users ''did'' vote out of attachment to characters, meaning that jokes like this one can be misunderstood). In any case, sorry for the misunderstanding.--[[User:Mister Wu|Mister Wu]] ([[User talk:Mister Wu|talk]]) 09:14, September 19, 2022 (EDT)
I'd actually like to take this a bit further by questioning Peach and Daisy; as of right now their article names are "Princess Peach"/"Princess Daisy", but much like how very few, if any, modern games ever refer to the Koopalings by their full names, very few, if any games references Peach and Daisy by their titles in game. Mario Kart, Mario Party, Mario Golf, Smash Bros, they all just refer to them as Peach and Daisy. And if the fact that it's a title has anything to do with it, why isn't Bowser's article named "King Bowser"? I'd wager we could probably move their articles to just Peach and Daisy for the same reasons. {{User:Tails777/sig}}
:''Origami King'' actually does use "Princess Peach" quite a bit: for example, there's Olivia saying "My brother and Princess Peach must both be in there..." and Bowser says "Anyway, where's Princess Peach?", both in the endgame. {{User:Scrooge200/sig}} 19:37, September 18, 2022 (EDT)
:The "Princess" title is still widely in use, such as in TOK as Scrooge said and on the Play Nintendo site. It would seem that only roster-heavy spin-offs refer to them with only their personal names. {{User:Koopa con Carne/Sig}} 19:42, September 18, 2022 (EDT)
::That example does help me see the difference in this situation, mainly cause I'm comparing a title to a full name. I guess it makes sense that Peach and Daisy use their princess title cause it's a title. And it makes sense that the Koopalings don't go by their full names often cause that would literally be like going up to your best friend and using their full name just to refer to them. So from a realistic standpoint, it makes sense that games like ''Paper Jam'' or ''Color Splash'' don't just have everyone referring to them by their full names in dialogue like they would when referring to Peach as "Princess Peach" (I guess it's also worth mentioning that in ''Color Splash'', Peach's introduction does use her full title while the Koopalings don't use their full names.) That being said, using spin-offs like ''Mario Kart'' might not be the best examples, since most characters go by their standard names anyway. {{User:Tails777/sig}}

@Opposition: The amount of media that refers to the Koopalings using only their first name (including, as mentioned in the proposal, almost every single game they appeared in during the last decade) far surpasses the number of instances where their full name is used. Participants to the previous proposal brought up isolated, relatively minor instances of the Koopalings' full names being used, particularly in merchandise and print media, and treated them as top-priority sources despite going counter to what the naming policy says. In the spirit of hopefully convincing people that it's misguided to do so, I raise another piece of merch, the [[Super Mario Trading Card Collection]], released in April 2022 (so pretty recent), which respects the naming model used in games. Shouldn't it similarly be taken into consideration, and be measured against a random Larry Koopa toy and a Monopoly set? Because it's clear that merchandise releases are not consistent among themselves in the least, so why not turn to what the games already very clearly establish? {{User:Koopa con Carne/Sig}} 19:10, September 18, 2022 (EDT)
:The thing is, they're not contradictory (or even different, technically) names, and it's not even really an inconsistency. Sometimes they use the full name, other times they use a shortened version. I don't see any harm in using the full one if it's still in use. --{{User:Waluigi Time/sig}} 19:51, September 18, 2022 (EDT)

@Opposition: I'm challenging someone to explain why "the names are occasionally used" (in things like Smash Bros. and merchandise no less, which as I've demonstrated above aren't even consistent with themselves) is being so strongly bandied around as an argument against designating the ''names that are put front and center in most appearances of these characters'' to their wiki articles.{{footnote|main|a}} So far, zero proper rationale has been given for the former direction in either of the three proposals that have concerned this matter, other than a couple of arguments that can be best defined as mental gymnastics. Nobody is arguing that we should get rid of the names altogether, just that using them in such a representative fashion isn't the proper way to go--and I've already proposed two methods to handle their full names in their lead, because, much like LinkTheLefty has [[Talk:Koopalings#Move all Koopaling articles to just their first names|previously]] [[Talk:Koopalings#Stop consistently referring to the Koopalings with their full names|stated]], these names are significant enough to deserve a mention as such. That doesn't mean [[Squirps]] is a contender for a move to "Prince Squirp Korogaline Squirpina" though. {{User:Koopa con Carne/Sig}} 10:30, September 21, 2022 (EDT)<br>
{{footnote|note|a|Per [[MarioWiki:Naming#Naming an article|MarioWiki:Naming]]: "''the name of an article should correspond to the '''most commonly used English name''' of the subject''".}}
:I've already explained at least for my part that I think it's fine keeping the full names since the most commonly used ones are just simplifications of those names, and the full ones are still in use. If the full names had been dropped entirely for an extensive period of time, yeah I could see that, but they're clearly still around. I don't think that's mental gymnastics myself, but if you feel that the arguments presented so far aren't "proper rationale" I'm not sure there's much more to say. --{{User:Waluigi Time/sig}} 12:16, September 21, 2022 (EDT)
::"since the most commonly used ones are just simplifications of those names, and the full ones are still in use"<br>This straight up argues doing the opposite of what the policy I cited above says to do. {{User:Koopa con Carne/Sig}} 17:30, September 21, 2022 (EDT)
"How does typing "Koopa" on the end of the name, on the rare occasions you need to, waste any time at all?"<br>
Except they're not "rare" as you claim. I found myself piping links to their articles far more often than not, because--and I re-reiterate--their one-word names have seen infinitely more use in various media throughout the years. I didn't put a lot of focus on this point in the proposal, but having to only type in one word whenever I 
link would definitely save some effort.<br>
"Also both example sentences provided for the support option are far more awkwardly worded than what's currently there."<br>
If you have anything better, provided a scenario in which this proposal passes, I'm open to it. {{User:Koopa con Carne/Sig}} 07:46, September 23, 2022 (EDT)
:Well... to address the second point, you don't need to change it at all? To address the first, this is all basically just opinion so there's no definitive answer to this, but it's just 5 extra letters. You would need to type it, at a stretch, once per article if it's not already linked - or you don't even need to type them at all, as their first names redirect to their articles anyway. Unless there's suddenly been a massive flood of new Koopaling media/appearances I'm not sure how this could cause any real issue, and the solution the proposal suggests is effectively already in place. If it's causing that much of a problem, you could just leave it for someone else to edit. {{User:MrConcreteDonkey/sig}} 10:54, September 23, 2022 (EDT)
::Those 5 letters, "Koopa", need to be typed out in addition to re-typing the Koopaling's unique name for the sake of piping the link to their article (the wording has to be apposite to what the game in question uses anyway--see [[MarioWiki:Naming#Name changes]]--and that's most games really). Piped linking has to be done because [[MarioWiki:Redirects#Linking to redirects|current policy discourages linking to redirect pages]]. "Unless there's suddenly been a massive flood of new Koopaling media/appearances" -- ''there '''has'''''. Assuredly, for almost a decade now. And there have been very, very few instances, verging on non-significant, in this past decade where their full names were used. <small>(This has to be about the fifth time I'm stating this.)</small> I encourage you to look at and compare the examples everyone brought up so far in this discussion as well as in [[Talk:Koopalings#Move all Koopaling articles to just their first names|previous]] relevant talks. {{User:Koopa con Carne/Sig}} 11:16, September 23, 2022 (EDT)
:::It might be the fifth time you've said that, but it's an assumption, not a fact. It's not even true if you count the Smash Ultimate and Mario & Sonic examples Mister Wu mentioned, or the merch where it's used. Why does it matter anyway, why does that justify changing the name? There's no sign the full names have been dropped completely, so it's nothing to do with the naming policy, and the fact that they were used in the past - in games that are often re-released - means they're relevant. Also, piping the link is... really not a huge task. If anything it's a very minor inconvenience, which would take at most a minute to resolve if you had to do it for all seven - and something you're unlikely to run into more than once every few months, at a stretch. It's also something you need to do everywhere on the website, why is it particularly bad in this case? Just feels like removing relevant info for a pointless reason, if I'm honest. {{User:MrConcreteDonkey/sig}} 11:30, September 24, 2022 (EDT)
::::When facts stated ad nauseam are being brushed off as "assumptions", and that they "don't justify changing the names", it's when I officially give up arguing. If a handful of (obscure) instances in a total of two/three titles out of 10 back to back + some 2017 Monopoly game are enough to overpower the rest, then fine: by all means go against policy if you so wish. This same line of thinking can be used to rename [[Squirps]] to the character's full name, as I've mentioned above.<br>"If anything it's a very minor inconvenience, which would take at most a minute to resolve if you had to do it for all seven"<br>''Most'' links concerning Koopalings have to be piped; it's as inconvenient as typing the same word twice everytime it comes up. I've been active enough around these parts for the past several years to know what I'm talking about. {{User:Koopa con Carne/Sig}} 12:10, September 24, 2022 (EDT)
::::@MrConcreteDonkey: No one is claiming that the full names have been completely dropped, nor is anyone calling for their removal from the wiki. We're just saying that most of the more recent games use the shortened names without mentioning the full ones, so we should retitle the articles while still making the full names immediately obvious in the lead and infobox. I don't see how this can be classified as 'removing relevant info for a pointless reason' when no info is being removed here. {{User:Hewer/sig}} 14:49, September 24, 2022 (EDT)
I'm not ready to vote on this yet (even though I supported the previous proposal), but I would just like to say that I think the difference between the two support options is extremely trivial, to the point where I don't understand why the issue even warranted separate voting options for them. Both support options have users voting exclusively for them, which is only going to increase this prop's chances of stalemating, given how polarizing this is. {{User:7feetunder/sig}} 17:15, October 1, 2022 (EDT)
:I admit I wasn't really expecting the proposal to be polarising in the first place, hence my lack of foresight. Trying to sort out minor, secondary issues with separate voting options in a proposal is a practice I will reconsider doing from here on out. {{User:Koopa con Carne/Sig}} 07:46, October 2, 2022 (EDT)
::Aside from the issue of splitting the vote for something pretty trivial, something like figuring out wording (when it's as minor as this) is probably better suited for a discussion either during the proposal or after it passes, for future reference. And uh, if it passes, then the wording is technically enforced by proposal and can't be rewritten without another proposal to overturn it, which is a pretty weird situation for something that's not controversial. --{{User:Waluigi Time/sig}} 13:07, October 2, 2022 (EDT)


===Create Category:Mario + Rabbids Sparks of Hope Sparks===
{{ProposalOutcome|blue|cancelled by the administrators}}<small>Per rule 15, a proposal isn't necessary to create this category if it already sufficiently meets the standards and there's no controversy.</small>

Currently, the articles for [[Spark (Mario + Rabbids Sparks of Hope)|Spark]]s from ''[[Mario + Rabbids Sparks of Hope]]'' have several categories attributed to them, including [[:Category:Lumas]], [[:Category:Rabbids]], [[:Category:Allies]], and [[:Category:Mario + Rabbids Sparks of Hope characters]]. However, as far as I am aware, all 30 of the Sparks featured in the game meet these criteria. Therefore, per [[MarioWiki:Manual of Style#Categories]], a more specific category should be created for these Sparks, named {{fake link|Category:Mario + Rabbids Sparks of Hope Sparks}}.

'''Proposer''': {{User|ThePowerPlayer}}<br>
'''Deadline''': October 24, 2022, 23:59 GMT

====Support====
#{{User|ThePowerPlayer}} Per proposal.

====Oppose====

====Comments====
Usually, categories that cover a group of species/characters do not include the game title, even when they only appear in one game (for example, [[:Category:Flip-Flop Folk]]), so I don’t think including the game title in this case is necessary. Additionally, since this category already fits the criteria mentioned by the policy, I feel that it can be carried out whenever enough Sparks pages are created, and I don’t think a proposal is really necessary. --{{User:TheFlameChomp/sig}} 13:14, October 17, 2022 (EDT)
:The only reason I recommended the category to include the name of the game was to distinguish it from other types of Sparks (see [[Spark (disambiguation)]]), but I suppose that point is moot when those Sparks have their own articles anyway. I'll probably just create {{fake link|Category:Sparks}} myself and request that this proposal be cancelled. {{User:ThePowerPlayer/sig}} 14:41, October 17, 2022 (EDT)

I don't think this proposal is even needed, you can just make a category. [[User:Spectrogram|Spectrogram]] ([[User talk:Spectrogram|talk]]) 13:28, October 17, 2022 (EDT)

I also agree it should just be called "Category:Sparks". {{User:Swallow/sig}} 13:47, October 17, 2022 (EDT)