View source for MarioWiki:Proposals/Archive/59

{{MarioWiki:Proposals/Archive/Template|current=yes}}

<div style="font-size:95%">__TOC__</div>

===Decide how to cover ''Mario Kart Tour'' bonus challenges on course articles===
{{ProposalOutcome|no quorum|0-1-1}}
The layout of each bonus challenge in ''Mario Kart Tour'' (e.g. [[Ring Race]]) depends on the course in which it is set. It tracks, therefore, that these challenges should be covered in detail on their relevant course articles in addition to their parent article. If you wish to see how a course article would look with coverage of its bonus challenges, scroll down to the "Mario Kart Tour" section in the "History" section [[Special:Diff/3682983|here]].

However, bonus challenges have been observed to appear multiple times across the game's tours, sometimes with changed objectives, which prompts wiki users to regularly update their list entries. Simply copying and pasting these entries onto another article would make it more difficult for users to be aware of which needs to be updated where. On the ''other'' hand, adding a way to transclude entire entries (allow information entered on a page to be automatically transferred to another) would spaghettify the original code and potentially deter users from updating it with new information. For instance, this is how the code for an average bonus challenge entry currently looks:

<pre>
|-
|[[File:MKT Tour1 YoshiCupChallenge.png|200px]]
|[[New York Minute]]
|[[File:MKT Icon Yoshi.png|50px]]<br>[[Yoshi]]
|[[File:MKT Icon PipeFrameLimeGreen.png|50px]]<br>[[Pipe Frame]]
|[[File:MKT Icon SuperGliderLimeGreen.png|50px]]<br>[[Super Glider]]
|
*5
*8
*12
|[[New York Tour]]

(source: Do Jump Boosts article)
</pre>

and this is how it would look with a transclusion mechanism in place:

<pre>
<onlyinclude>{{#ifeq:{{{transcludesection|Do Jump Boosts New York Minute}}}|Do Jump Boosts New York Minute|
{{!}}-
{{!}}[[File:MKT Tour1 YoshiCupChallenge.png|200px]]
{{!}}
{{#ifeq:{{PAGENAME}}|Do Jump Boosts|[[New York Minute]]|Regular}}
{{!}}[[File:MKT Icon Yoshi.png|50px]]<br>[[Yoshi]]
{{!}}[[File:MKT Icon PipeFrameLimeGreen.png|50px]]<br>[[Pipe Frame]]
{{!}}[[File:MKT Icon SuperGliderLimeGreen.png|50px]]<br>[[Super Glider]]
{{!}}
*5
*8
*12
{{!}}[[New York Tour]]}}</onlyinclude>
</pre>

A bit ugly, innit? On average, this would only save a small number of bytes on the target article--less than 100, really. Picture, now, an entire table with the same code plastered repeatedly. I believe the wiki should account for editor friendliness too, especially when the returns of optimisation are disappointing.

I am not sure how to proceed here. I am unwilling to go ahead with either option unless I have a clear-cut vision of each one's net advantages. I will thus be resorting to the community's choice.

'''Proposer''': {{User|Koopa con Carne}}<br>
'''Deadline''': <s>June 9, 2022, 23:59 GMT June 16, 2022, 23:59 GMT June 23, 2022, 23:59 GMT</s> June 30, 2022, 23:59 GMT

====Copy-paste table sections====

====Transclude sections====
#{{User|7feetunder}} I'm not very well informed on ''MKT'' since I don't play it, but from what I can see, transclusions seem preferable to copy-pasting and having to update multiple pages. The transclusion code, while a bit bulky, is hardly impenetrable and I don't see how it would complicate updating the tables. It's not like the updates would require overhauling the table code, just adding a new line or two.

====Leave as is (bonus challenges will continue to be listed in image galleries)====
#{{User|Mari0fan100}} While both options are doable, both unfortunately have their own setbacks. Transcluding, while it may be better, also takes longer than copy-pasting stuff, especially since the formatting has to be precise. It might be a bit better to discuss with the admins which option would be best.

====Comments====
Mario Kart Tour's tables tend to be pretty sloppy overall ([https://www.mariowiki.com/Mario_Kart_Tour#Ranked_cup no offense but this ranked cup table is rather monstrous] though other tables don't fare much better) though I'm not really understanding this proposal. Probably repetitive content? Maybe the table format just isn't suitable for this sort of thing? {{User:Bazooka Mario/sig}} 10:55, June 9, 2022 (EDT)
:The tables' designs aren't what the proposal is about (though, if you have suggestions for their improvement--[[Big Reverse Race|here]] for instance--by all means state them somewhere appropriate). The proposal is to decide on an optimal way the already existent table sections on bonus challenge pages can be reproduced on relevant course articles. Both the copy-pasting and the transcluding methods come with their disadvantages, so I was hoping we would decide on the one option with less. I could simply go through with an option I see fit, but if it later proves to be less optimal or editor-friendly than the other (e.g. the bulky transclusion code would discourage editors who typically update these bonus challenge pages) I'd have to re-edit tens of pages. Why not pre-empt that with wiki consensus? {{User:Koopa con Carne/Sig}} 11:17, June 9, 2022 (EDT)

===Do not use ''Mario + Rabbids'' "introductory taglines" as top quotes in articles===
{{ProposalOutcome|passed|5-0}}
The main reason I am proposing this is because in every one of these pages, not only is the tagline used as the page's top quote, but that same tagline also appears in two other areas of the same article: the splash screen image and statboxes, the former of which is often towards the top as well. To me, it makes it look like we're forcing these onto readers by having it as a quote as well, especially on the [[Rabbid Kong]] article which uses that and another quote. If ''Mario + Rabbids Sparks of Hope'' does this as well, then this proposal will also apply with that game's subjects.

'''Proposer''': {{User|Swallow}}<br>
'''Deadline''': July 24, 2022, 23:59 GMT

====Support====
#{{User|Swallow}} Per proposal
#{{user|7feetunder}} Per proposal.
#{{User|TheFlameChomp}} Per proposal.
#{{User|WildWario}} Per proposal.
#{{User|Hewer}} Per proposal.

====Oppose====

====Comments====
Not really sure this needs to be a proposal to be honest, I think we can just use discretion to remove them if they're already displayed elsewhere. --{{User:Waluigi Time/sig}} 13:27, July 17, 2022 (EDT)
:If it was on one or two articles, I probably would have gone and done it right away while leaving an explaination in the edit summary, but because this applies to every ''Kingdom Battle'' enemy article, I didn't want to do it without getting some approval first, which I think a proposal is the best way to do. {{User:Swallow/sig}} 19:09, July 17, 2022 (EDT)

=== Stop considering reissues to be a reference to the original game and vice versa ===
{{ProposalOutcome|passed|12-0}}
This issue is something that is somewhat bothering me. On the Super Mario Wiki, a reference is when something unique in a previous game returns in a later one. For example, the ''[[Super Mario Bros. 2]]'' ground theme in later Mario games references that game. We know that because, unlike the ground theme from ''[[Super Mario Bros.|SMB1]]'', it isn't part of a character's theme song or anything. What isn't considered a reference is when something in a previous game appears quite often. For example, [[Yoshi]] appearing in a game isn't a reference to ''[[Super Mario World]]'' because he has become a significant part of the franchise. The same applies to sequels and follow-ups, such as Super ''[[Mario Galaxy 2]]'' not being a reference to ''[[Super Mario Galaxy]]''.

Reissues, on the other hand, don't get this exception. On both of the pages that talk about ''[[Super Mario 64]]'' and its [[Super Mario 64 DS|remake]], both articles list the remake and original game, respectively. The same also applies to ''[[Diddy Kong Racing]]'' and its [[Diddy Kong Racing DS|remake]]. Referring to the same game in the article, oddly, does not apply to ''[[Super Mario 3D World]]'' and its [[Super Mario 3D World + Bowser's Fury|rerelease]] nor ''[[NSMBU]]'' with its [[New Super Mario Bros. U Deluxe|reissue]]. The thing is, it's pretty evident that a reissue is going to take elements from the game it is copying. We don't need to mention it in the references sections of the articles.

What this proposal suggests doing is to stop considering reissues as references, just as much as we don't consider sequels, prequels, or any follow-ups as references because that's what most of these follow-ups do. It's like if we consider the Star Wars Special Edition to be a reference to A New Hope. Also, we should put this in the guidelines for [[MarioWiki:References|for the page regarding references]].


'''Proposer''': {{User|Wikiboy10}}<br>
'''Deadline''': July 26, 2022, 23:59 GMT
====Support====
#{{User|Wikiboy10}} Per proposal
#{{User|Platform}} Per proposal
#{{User|Hewer}} Per proposal, for consistency with how sequels are treated.
#{{user|7feetunder}} Per proposal.
#{{User|Ray Trace}} I swore this was policy already but it apparently isn't. Ah well.
#{{User|Swallow}} Per all.
#{{User|Mister Wu}} Yeah, no need to state the obvious as if it were a reference.
#{{User|Archivist Toadette}} Per all.
#{{User|PanchamBro}} Per all.
#{{User|Waluigi Time}} Per all.
#{{User|TheFlameChomp}} Per all.
#{{User|Vivian}} Per all.

====Oppose====

====Comments====
I do want to say that DKC2 GBA lampshading how Kerozene wasn't in the original should stay. [[User:Doc von Schmeltwick|Doc von Schmeltwick]] ([[User talk:Doc von Schmeltwick|talk]]) 20:59, July 16, 2022 (EDT)
:It ''is'' parodying the idea of a remake adding something new for a change, so I think ''that'' would stay at least. {{User:Archivist Toadette/sig}} 21:08, July 16, 2022 (EDT)

I mostly agree with the proposal, but I would argue this about Yoshi in ''Super Mario 64 DS''. His appearance is recontextualized such that having him on the castle's roof in the opening sequence (rather than the very end) is a reference to the original game in a new subplot, not content rereleased verbatim. Still, I'm conflicted on whether it's sensible to list such details in references sections. What do you all think? [[User:AgentMuffin|AgentMuffin]] ([[User talk:AgentMuffin|talk]]) 20:27, July 17, 2022 (EDT)
:That Yoshi example could be mentioned in the trivia or plot section. In that case, we'd say it in the article, just not in the references section. That is an excellent example to bring up. [[User:Wikiboy10|Wikiboy10]] ([[User talk:Wikiboy10|talk]]) 16:09, July 18, 2022 (EDT)

===Fix how we handle infobox relations on generic species===
{{ProposalOutcome|passed|0-1-3-4-0|Just repurpose the subject_origin for the species pages}}
No, not "change" or "decide", ''fix.''


The way we currently list relations between real-world species and specific enemies based on real-world species is an issue I've had on the back of my mind for a bit now. To better understand what my problem with it is, let's quickly take a look at what the four relevant syntaxes are for:

{|border=1 style="border-collapse:collapse;width:70%;float:center;margin:0 0 1em 1em" cellpadding=3
!colspan=2 style="background:#10274c;color:white"|Syntax
|-
|&#124;variant_of=
|An older or more basic entity that the subject is based on, e.g. [[Gloomba]] is a variant of [[Goomba]]
|-
|&#124;variants=
|An entity based on the subject, e.g. one of [[Goomba]]'s variants is [[Gloomba]]s
|-
|&#124;relatives=
|An entity with a variant-type relationship with the subject in which it's not clear who is the variant of whom, such as [[Monty Mole]]s and [[Rocky Wrench]]es.
|-
|&#124;comparable=
|Similar entities that are not necessarily based on one another, such as [[Tub-O-Troopa]]s and [[Big Koopa Paratroopa]]s.
|-
|}

{{br}}

So with this in mind, we should ideally be using "variants" for the specific species that are based on a real-world species, but that is not what we do; we instead list the specific species as merely "comparable" to the broader generic species, despite the specific species being a type of said generic species. 


Take a look at [[Bee]], for instance, and you'll see this in action. Things like [[Bzzap!]], [[Stingby]], [[Honeybee]], [[Super Bee]], [[Buzzer]],  [[Bumbler]](which is just called "bee" in japan), [[Big Bee]], etc. are all listed as "comparable" to the generic bee article. Strangely, the one ''[[Yoshi's Story]]'' [[Bumblebee]] is the only variety of bee to be listed as "variant" instead of comparable, and heck it might even be the only specific species to be listed as a variant of a generic species on the infoboxes. I don't know why that specific bee enemy has priority over literally any other variety of bee, as there's like [[Bee (Donkey Kong Jungle Beat)|three]] [[Bee (Super Mario Land 2: 6 Golden Coins)|other]] [[Bee (Wario Land II)|varieties]] simply called "bee" in English (and [[Bunbun|one]] which shares the Japanese name of the YS bumblebee), and all of those are listed as "comparable". And it's not just bees that have this trait about them; [[Butterfly]], [[Crow]], [[Clam]], [[Frog]], [[Jellyfish]], etc. all do this as well, listing the specific species as just "comparable". Note how those last 3 examples ''also'' list their generically-named Yoshi's Story counterparts as "comparable", so I have literally no idea why that specific Yoshi's Story bumblebee has special status with its real-world counterpart compared to any other enemy.


The thing is, this kind of organization as stated before is unhelpful in the context of real-world enemies; a [[Crowber]] is definitely a crow and was even called simply a "Crow" at one point, but we list it as "comparable" in the Crow page's infobox. Comparable means "similar but unrelated", making it seem like it's not actually a crow when it is. Heck, this is even contradictory to how the ''individual pages'' handle it; they all have the real-world species they're based on mentioned in the intros and placed as categories on the bottom, so the individual pages are saying "Yes it is an x" while the real-world species' infoboxes are saying "It's similar to x but isn't an x". This may be a small issue, but it's a ''ridiculous'' one when it's so contradictory to what is said otherwise.


And with that, I see 4 possible ways to go from here;

1. '''List the specific species as variants on the R.W.S. page'''. This is the most accurate way of depicting the relation between R.W.S. and the specific species based on it, because...I just said why a lot of times, didn't I?

2. '''List the specific species as relatives on the R.W.S. page'''. You could say that using "variant" between R.W.S. and specific species is confusing compared to how we use it for specific species to other specific species, since Nintendo probably wasn't thinking of the R.W.S. as a specific parent and instead as just an R.W.S. to base the enemies on. This method will account for that while still stating the relationships correctly.

3. '''Use an about on the top of the R.W.S. page'''. Let's be honest, these parameters were designed with ''unique'' species in mind. Mixing R.W.S. up with unique enemy species is what caused this confusing happenstance to happen, and with this method, we'd be making things a whole lot simpler. Take the [[Clown]] page for instance; instead of listing every clown in the greater Mario franchise as "comparable" to the Wario World enemy, we have an about on the top saying to check [[:Category:Clowns]] for clowns across the Mario franchises. This method will do that for all the R.W.S., simplifying things and also helping us clean up whatever happened with [[Dragon]] (which is a specific Yoshi's Story species and not exactly meant to be representative of all dragons, but the comparable conundrum is also there somehow.).

EDIT: Doc suggested to repurpose the subject_origin parameter to link to the R.W.S. On the individual species pages, and since options 1 & 2 would counter this I'm adding it to option 3.

EDIT 2: Also adding another option just for the subject_origin itself.

4. '''Do nothing'''. We all collectively agree that it is fine as it is now and leave the infobox saying that all the specific species are "similar to x-real-world-species but aren't actually an x-R.-W.-S." except for that one YS Bumblebee which has a special status for...no reason at all.

So, with that all said and done, let's answer this question; How do we list specific species on the infoboxes of R.W.S. pages?

'''Proposer''': {{User|Somethingone}}<br>
'''Deadline''': <s>July 24, 2022, 23:59 GMT</s> Extended to July 31, 2022, 23:59 GMT

====List specific species as variants of R.W.S.====

====List specific species as relatives of R.W.S.====
#{{User|Hewer}} Second choice, per proposal.

====Repurpose subject_origin for the specific species pages, use an about template for the R.W.S. Pages====
#{{User|Somethingone}} Preferred choice.
#{{User|ShootingStar7X}} Per proposal.
#{{User|Hewer}} Per proposal.

====Just repurpose the subject_origin for the species pages====
#{{User|Mister Wu}} Agreed about the repurposing of subject_origin, even its name suggest such an use would be appropriate, and it would be the link to the category page we need, without adding another use of the "about" template that can get cluttered <s>good luck with Yoshi tho</s>
#{{User|Waluigi Time}} Per Mister Wu.
#{{User|TheFlameChomp}} Per Mister Wu.
#{{User|LinkTheLefty}} A while back, I wanted to do [[Template talk:Species infobox#Repurposing subject origin?|something similar]], and this seems closest to that idea. I think the "about" option would be suboptimal since, unlike the infobox, the categories don't distinguish between species and characters or groups.

====List specific species as comparable to R.W.S. (Do Nothing)====

====Comments====
There ''is'' actually a "subject_origin" parameter last I checked that is the remnants of the old "species_origin" parameter, and as it is now, it is barely used. Course, it may be removed now, but seems like a good compromise. [[User:Doc von Schmeltwick|Doc von Schmeltwick]] ([[User talk:Doc von Schmeltwick|talk]]) 14:12, July 17, 2022 (EDT)
:Is the subject_origin used on the individual species pages or the real world species page? {{User:Somethingone/sig}} 14:16, July 17, 2022 (EDT)
::I think it's only used on one or two pages in total right now. Can be used to link to the "real world" ones from the fictional types. [[User:Doc von Schmeltwick|Doc von Schmeltwick]] ([[User talk:Doc von Schmeltwick|talk]]) 14:33, July 17, 2022 (EDT)
:::That seems like a good idea! {{User:Somethingone/sig}} 14:38, July 17, 2022 (EDT)
::::I still think the subject_origin field should get its own voting option, you can safely edit proposals at their beginning so don't worry about adding other options, in this case I think this repurposing has a lot of merits.--[[User:Mister Wu|Mister Wu]] ([[User talk:Mister Wu|talk]]) 20:06, July 17, 2022 (EDT)
:::::done, you mean an option to just enact the subject_origin and nothing else, right? {{User:Somethingone/sig}} 06:58, July 18, 2022 (EDT)
::::::Yes, thanks for adding it.--[[User:Mister Wu|Mister Wu]] ([[User talk:Mister Wu|talk]]) 17:32, July 21, 2022 (EDT)
:::::::Not sure if this is beyond the scope now, but presuming the "just repurpose subject_origin for species pages" option, could we maybe add a new equivalent parameter to replace the "comparable" portion of real-world species articles? [[User:LinkTheLefty|LinkTheLefty]] ([[User talk:LinkTheLefty|talk]]) 10:02, July 31, 2022 (EDT)
::::::::That's definitely possible, it's just be adding a new parameter to the infobox and clarifying it's to be used instead of comparable for R.W.S., right? {{User:Somethingone/sig}} 10:46, July 31, 2022 (EDT)
:::::::::More or less. Something like "subjects" or "origin_of" might work. [[User:LinkTheLefty|LinkTheLefty]] ([[User talk:LinkTheLefty|talk]]) 13:20, July 31, 2022 (EDT)
::::::::::Sounds perfect to me! That would definitely help fix up the weird relation issue this proposal deals with. {{User:Somethingone/sig}} 13:55, July 31, 2022 (EDT)

===Decide on the article titles for the golf courses from ''Mario Golf'' (GBC) and ''Mario Golf: Advance Tour''===
{{ProposalOutcome|passed|6-1-0|Use "Course" names}}
Currently, our articles on the main tournament courses in these games (excluding the Mushroom Kingdom ones, which are [[Peach's Castle (Game Boy Color golf course)|different for]] [[Mushroom Course|each game]]) title them as simply "[[Marion]]", "[[Palms]]", "[[Dunes]]", and "[[Links]]". There's more to it than that though.

The [[Mario Golf (Game Boy Color)|Game Boy Color game]] is rather consistent about it. The courses are all called "[X] Club" - "Marion Club", "Palm Club" (note singular), "Dune Club" (again note singular), and "Links Club".

''[[Mario Golf: Advance Tour]]'' is way more flip-floppy about it. The in-game menus use "[X] Course" - "Marion Course", "Palms Course", "Dunes Course", and "Links Course". The "Course" part is capitalized in the menus, but not in dialogue, because screw consistency. The clubs that house the courses in story mode are still called "[X] Club", albeit with Palms and Dunes now pluralized. There is also at least one instance of an NPC calling the Marion Club the "Marion Golf Club", because again, screw consistency. The one-word variants are sometimes used by NPCs, but that seems more like shorthand than anything.

So which of these names do we use for the articles? My vote goes to the "Course" names; that would make them consistent with the [[Mushroom Course]], which does not have a "Club" name associated with it (its "club" is [[Peach's Castle]]). I plan to expand these articles in the future, so I want to solve this conundrum beforehand.

'''Proposer''': {{User|7feetunder}}<br>
'''Deadline''': August 8, 2022, 23:59 GMT

====Use "Course" names====
#{{User|7feetunder}} Preferred option.
#{{User|Koopa con Carne}} As I understand, the term "club" is reserved to one mode in the GBA successor whereas "course" is used more widely within the game. Besides, "course" could be understood as a sort of greater location of its respective club.
#{{User|Mari0fan100}} Per all.
#{{User|Bazooka Mario}} "Course" better describes the entity than "club" in my opinoin.
#{{User|TheFlameChomp}} Per all.
#{{User|RSM}} Per all.

====Use "Club" names====
#{{User|7feetunder}} Second choice.

====Use single-word names (leave as is)====

====Comments====

=== Merge city course and Kalimari Desert layouts ===
{{ProposalOutcome|passed|8-0-0|merge}}
''[[Mario Kart 8 Deluxe]]''<nowiki>'</nowiki>s version of {{classic|N64|Kalimari Desert}} combines the ''[[Mario Kart Tour]]'' layouts in the same way as it does with ''Tour''<nowiki>'</nowiki>s city courses, which I think warrants a reexamination of our policy surrounding these types of tracks. Under that policy, we should have a separate article for the ''MK8DX'' version of this course, distinct from both {{classic|N64|Kalimari Desert}} and {{classic-link|N64|Kalimari Desert 2}}. We currently don't - however, I take this as less of a call to make one, and more of a sign that our current policy isn't built for this situation.

I make the argument that we should be considering courses with multiple layouts as one course instead of multiple, for the following reasons (many of which I've also stated above):
* Under our current policy, if {{classic|N64|Kalimari Desert 2}} never existed, ''MK8DX'' {{classic|N64|Kalimari Desert}} would be the same track and share its article with the original. Conversely, if there was a {{classic|GCN|Sherbet Land 2}} where players drove under the ice, ''MK8'' {{classic|GCN|Sherbet Land}} would be considered a different track. My point is that these splits aren't contingent on the tracks themselves and how similar they are to the tracks they share a name with, it's contingent on whether or not a third track exists.
* The marketing makes no mention of the Booster Course Pass's layouts being new courses - it refers to them as classic courses just like the rest, suggesting they're viewed internally as the same course rather than multiple courses with the same theme. The very name and classification of {{classic|N64|Kalimari Desert 2}} supports this as well - if it was considered a different course, I don't think they'd call it a classic course. They already have a way to format the names of new courses based on old ones with the RMX courses, so if they considered it one, I'd think they'd use that.
* The line between a city-style layout variant and a T or R variation is blurry, with both moving objects around the same model. Tracks like [[Wii Coconut Mall|{{classic|Wii|Coconut Mall T}}]] and [[GCN Baby Park|{{classic|GCN|Baby Park T}}]] even take racers outside the normal bounds of the track. Most importantly, racers', drivers', and gliders' favorite and favored courses have T and R variations listed just as separately as numbered variations are.

As such, I propose '''a full merge''' of main-series multi-layout tracks, which will entail the following:
* [[Mario Kart Tour#City courses|All of ''Mario Kart Tour''<nowiki>'</nowiki>s city courses]] will have all their numbered variants merged into the first version's article.
* Where they exist, the ''MK8DX'' version's articles will also be merged in, and the merged article will take on the <small>Tour</small> prefix.
* Similarly, {{classic-link|N64|Kalimari Desert 2}} will be merged into the ''Mario Kart Tour'' section of {{classic|N64|Kalimari Desert}}.
* The [[classic course]] article will consider Tour's reroutes to be the same course, with [[Classic course#Table of classic courses|the table]] being changed to reflect this.
* Only the first variation of every Tour course will remain on the [[Template:MK race courses|race courses template]]. 
* ''[[Super Mario Kart]]'' and ''[[Mario Kart: Super Circuit]]''<nowiki>'</nowiki>s numbered courses and [[Mario Kart Tour#Remix|''Mario Kart Tour''<nowiki>'</nowiki>s RMX courses]] will '''not''' be merged, as they don't use the same track model and therefore do not have the same relationship to their counterparts.
* The tracks from the [[Mario Kart (series)#Arcade|''Mario Kart Arcade GP'' series]] will '''not''' be merged, as the game treats them as distinct courses with their own names and music.

(If you want to read further discussion on this topic, it has also been discussed [[Talk:N64 Kalimari Desert|here]] and [[Talk:Paris Promenade|here]].)

'''Proposer:''' {{User|Ahemtoday}}<br>
'''Deadline:''' August 13, 2022, 23:59 GMT

====Do as proposed====
# {{User|Ahemtoday}} Per proposal.
#{{User|Tails777}} Per proposal and the discussion on Kalimari Desert’s talk page.
#{{User|Arend}} Per proposal and what we have discussed [[Talk:N64 Kalimari Desert#Our current policy on 8DX reroutes creates an awkward situation with this track|here]].
#{{User|Hewer}} Per all.
#{{User|Mister Wu}} We need to keep the course icons of the numbered variants in ''Mario Kart Tour'' in the wiki and also highlight their gameplay implications in terms of being a favorite and favored of different drivers, karts and gliders, just like the respective R, T and R/T variants, but I don't think we need to treat them as courses fully separate from the original - not even the game does that.
#{{User|RSM}} per discussion in [[Talk:N64 Kalimari Desert]] and per proposal
#{{User|Archivist Toadette}} Yeah, in the end, if the Booster Course Pass uses all of the different layouts at once, then that pretty much makes everything redundant. Per all.
#{{User|RHG1951}} Per all.

====Split the MK8DX section into its own article instead====

====Leave as-is====

====Comments====
In case one is confused at what Ahemtoday is talking about with "As discussed above", this proposal was originally posted on [[Talk:N64 Kalimari Desert]]. I suggest looking there for previous discussion points.

Furthermore, I would like to ask if this also affects [[Mario Kart Tour#City courses|this section on the ''Mario Kart Tour'' article]]. [[User:Arend|Arend]] ([[User talk:Arend|talk]]) 03:34, August 6, 2022 (EDT)
:the only thing i think this'll change would be the links, other then that, it would probably remain the same - [[User:RSM|RSM]] 08:22, August 6, 2022 (EDT)

Hey, so: if this passes, the only track left in the ''8 Deluxe'' section of the race courses template will be [[Sky-High Sundae]]. Do we keep it there since there's always the chance of more tracks like it, or should we scrap that section entirely and move Sky-High Sundae to the ''Tour'' section? It is, after all, apparently being treated as a new track for both games. [[User:Ahemtoday|Ahemtoday]] ([[User talk:Ahemtoday|talk]]) 01:31, August 9, 2022 (EDT)
:After the next tour starts we'll have a look at the internal name of the course to see its original target platform, if it's ''mob'' (mobile devices, i.e. ''Mario Kart Tour''), then it would make sense to just remove that section, if it is ''u'' or ''nsw'' then we could keep it for the future courses added in the Booster Course Pass that will be treated as new courses in both ''Mario Kart Tour'' and the Booster Course Pass while being primarily designed for the latter.--[[User:Mister Wu|Mister Wu]] ([[User talk:Mister Wu|talk]]) 03:20, August 9, 2022 (EDT)
::Same, though I'm pretty sure that Sky-High Sundae (and basically the rest of the Booster Course Pass) were designed for ''Tour'' first, and touched up for ''8 Deluxe'' later. This can be evidenced by the fact that when the pass was announced, [https://www.mariowiki.com/images/archive/c/c9/20220408145706%21MK8DBoosterPassCourses.jpg the Wave 1 courses used placeholder images directly ripped from ''Tour''], including Coconut Mall and Shroom Ridge, which at the time weren't announced for ''Tour'' yet. But yeah, first we will have to see if the internal name for Sky-High Sundae is indeed prefixed with ''mob'' or not, but we could find out as early as tomorrow, when the Sundae Tour launches. [[User:Arend|Arend]] ([[User talk:Arend|talk]]) 05:31, August 9, 2022 (EDT)
:::Why are we putting so much stock in internal names and original intentions over the actual final product? [[Moon Cleft]] and [[Piranha Plant (Paper Mario: The Thousand-Year Door)|Killer Pakkun]] have internal names that suggest they were originally meant to be the base species as per their coloration; that doesn't change what they are in the final product. If SHS is a new track for both games, then it's a new track for both games. If that means the ''8DX'' section of the race courses template will have only one track in it because of this proposal, then so be it. Alternatively, if having the track on the template twice is undesirable, we could just put an asterisk next to the track's name with a note stating that it appeared in ''8DX'' first. {{User:7feetunder/sig}} 13:47, August 9, 2022 (EDT)
::::I'm still certain the new courses are made for Tour initially. Aside from the fact that key artwork, initial trailer and the datamined banner from version 2.0.0 all use Tour screenshots as placeholder images, [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1uZDbDoDAq4 the official announcement trailer on YouTube] has its video description start with "Featuring 48 ''remastered'' courses from throughout the Mario Kart series", implying that all 48 courses in the Pass are remasters, and that none of them are "brand new". However, I do feel having an asterisk to denote that the course appeared in ''8DX'' first while (initially) made for ''Tour'' is a good idea, so I'm down for us to do that if the denotation is desired. [[User:Arend|Arend]] ([[User talk:Arend|talk]]) 14:34, August 9, 2022 (EDT)
:::::The point about that video description was brought up on the SHS talk page as well, and my response to it remains the same: what they said about the BCP back in February isn't necessarily gonna hold up several months later. I remember Nintendo saying back when ''7'' was new that they didn't have any plans to patch that notorious Maka Wuhu respawn glitch for online play, then did exactly that shortly afterward anyway. Even if SHS was originally conceived as a ''Tour'' track, it still showed up in ''8DX'' first. The simultaneous announcement for both games may have even been planned from the start - we certainly don't have proof that it wasn't. {{User:7feetunder/sig}} 17:04, August 9, 2022 (EDT)
::::::Right now, I still see a lot of convincing evidence that suggests Sky-High Sundae is indeed a ''Tour'' track that appeared in MK8D just before its intended appearance. Suggesting that the "48 remastered tracks" could not hold up is just as speculative. Right now, there is nothing wrong with taking what Nintendo has officially said instead of speculating that it won't hold up. Sky-High Sundae has an official ''Tour'' screenshot in the same banner we're using to confirm DS Shroom Ridge for ''Tour'', one that appeared before it was even confirmed for ''MK8D''. I see nothing incorrect with saying it's a ''Tour'' track, even more so if the internal name does match up with other ''Tour'' tracks. It's still an official source, if I'm correct. {{User:Tails777/sig}}
::::::I decided to check the [https://www.nintendo.co.jp/switch/aabpa/coursepack/index.html Japanese website] and see, using Google Translate, if we can find some more clarification there (as it's been recently updated). Most of the text are actually images, but these can also be translated: the header for the section under the website's main image, but above the course lineup, translates to "Series successive courses appear in 'Mario Kart 8 Deluxe'", while the text for the section itself translates to "From 'Super Mario Kart (Super Famicom)' released in 1992 to 'Mario Kart Tour (app for smartphones)', 48 selected courses from the past series will be remastered and distributed", once again implying that all 48 courses are from these past entries. Or, if what you're claiming is true, and Nintendo "went back on their word", so to speak (which, like Tails777 said, is also very speculative), it may have simply not been updated yet.<br>Regardless, I can definitely see someone make a proposal for what game to determine courses like Sky-High Sundae to be from, because, like the combined courses this current proposal is about, this certainly is an unprecedented case that warrants discussion before deciding what to do with it. [[User:Arend|Arend]] ([[User talk:Arend|talk]]) 19:55, August 9, 2022 (EDT)
:::::::I think it's worth noting that the '48 remastered courses' thing isn't Nintendo's only official word on this: the [https://mariokart8.nintendo.com/ official website] notes the prefixes for every course (even Ninja Hideaway) except for Sky-High Sundae, [https://www.nintendo.co.uk/Games/Nintendo-Switch-games/Mario-Kart-8-Deluxe-1173281.html#Booster_Course_Pass this page] has the word 'NEW' accompanying Sky-High Sundae where the boxart of the origin game would usually be (same thing as in the [https://youtu.be/xBly7QHQkYA Wave 2 trailer] also), and [https://www.nintendo.co.jp/switch/aabpa/coursepack/index.html here] Sky-High Sundae is again the only course with no indicator of what game it's from, with even Ninja Hideaway showing it's from Tour (and while I'm not really sure how to directly cite this one, a recent article on the Nintendo Switch's News app distinguished Sky-High Sundae as 'brand new' twice). While the '48 remastered courses' quote is still an official source, I personally don't think it should hold as much weight as the various sources released after Sky-High Sundae's announcement which refer specifically to it being new to 8 Deluxe. {{User:Hewer/sig}} 20:21, August 9, 2022 (EDT)
one thing that hasn't been addressed here is how are the pages actually going to be merged? will they be like my takes on merged articles (examples: [[User:RSM/New York Minute|New York Minute]], [[User:RSM/Tokyo Blur|Tokyo Blur]], [[User:RSM/Singapore Speedway|Singapore Speedway]]) or will they be merged in a different way? - [[User:RSM|RSM]] 22:31, August 12, 2022 (EDT)
:Those seem pretty alright to me, although you'll need to make sure each section has its most current text from the articles that are getting merged in. [[User:Ahemtoday|Ahemtoday]] ([[User talk:Ahemtoday|talk]]) 15:07, August 13, 2022 (EDT)


=== Remove the 15th infraction for why a reminder can be issued (changing American spellings and grammar conventions to British standards) ===
{{ProposalOutcome|failed|2-1-10|keep the infraction as is}}
Please see [[MarioWiki:Warning policy]] before voting.

Ok, now there are multiple reasons why someone can get a reminder, but this particular infraction stands out to me because not everyone who has English as their first language uses American English. People all over the world edit the MarioWiki, and that includes people from the United Kingdom who use British English as their primary language. I feel like a reminder is too harsh for this, especially since changing American spelling and grammar conventions to British standards does not negatively affect the article in the long run. If the article is looked at from a bigger point of view, <b>it's still readable and not super difficult to follow through. All that was changed was a single word that can still be understood by many people.</b>

As for inserting speculation, unnecessary information or trivia, false information, into an article or vandalizing it, I understand how those offenses are warnable to varying degrees. But a good faith user should not be issued a reminder solely because they barely changed a word (simply by adding a letter to it) and left its meaning the same. Changing a word for its American spelling to its British spelling does not damage or degrade the quality of an article, so why should it be a warnable offense to begin with? I have seen only one user get warned (and blocked) for this while browsing this wiki, but the fact that users can get a reminder for this infraction surprises me, and I'm surprised this infraction was not brought up sooner. 

In case users do not want to remove the infraction but also do not want to keep the wording for the infraction as is, I've added an option to modify the infraction without entirely removing it. So there are three ways this proposal can go:

1. <b>Support (and remove the infraction)</b>: This option removes the "changing American spellings and grammar conventions to British standards" from the list of infractions that deserve a reminder template.

2. <b>Modify the infraction without entirely removing it</b>: This option keeps the infraction while allowing it to be modified to make it more clear. If you feel that this infraction should stay, then making a few productive changes to it won't hurt.

3. <b>Oppose (and keep the infraction as is)</b>: This option does what it says on the tin. The infraction will be left as is, and good-faith users from the United Kingdom have something to dwell about (apparently because American spellings are preferred to be used on articles over their spellings). <b>I suggest we do not choose this option.</b>

'''Proposer''': {{User|Mari0fan100}}<br>
'''Deadline''': August 22, 2022, 23:59 GMT

====Support (and remove the infraction) ====
#{{User|Mari0fan100}} My preferred choice.
#{{user|WildWario}} Per all.

<s>#{{User|Koopa con Carne}} It's an academically established spelling convention that many people utilise in their daily conversation. I don't see a practical need to enforcing such restrictive measures on one's regional spelling just because it doesn't perfectly line up with the writing attuned to the wiki's general public. I like standards myself, using American spelling in the main space, but I'd be up for repurposing this rule as a recommendation, and not an obligation, for particular spelling.</s>

<s>#{{User|Spectrogram}} I think this is the step in the right direction. Though there is a difference between warning someone over using the alternative variants of English and warning someone because they decided to change every word in an article from (for example) American English to British English for seemingly no reason.</s>

<s>#{{User|Somethingone}} I always found this clause a bit silly. Literally nobody in the anglosphere would be confused by spelling color as colour or favor as favour, and it's a bit silly to issue reminders to english speakers who don't use the American English style. Also, [[MarioWiki:Proposals/Archive/36#Having a spelling standard|did we not agree to being okay with British spelling before?]]</s>

<s>#{{User|RSM}} per all.</s>

==== Modify the infraction without entirely removing it ====
#{{User|Mari0fan100}} My second choice.

==== Oppose (and keep the infraction as is) ====
#{{User|Hewer}} Per Waluigi Time in the comments (although I agree a reminder template is a bit harsh for a good-faith editor doing this without knowing it's a rule, I'm pretty sure an informal reminder would be issued in that situation anyway).
#{{user|7feetunder}} I'm opposing this proposal mainly due to the reasoning behind it. Like Waluigi Time and Bazooka Mario said, removing this as a specific reason for an infraction does not change the fact that changing American spellings to British ones is against the manual of style, so this proposal passing will not actually allow it, since people can still be reminded and warned for not following the manual of style. Your actual goal here seems to be straight up changing site policy to allow people to make these spelling changes to their heart's content, which is a terrible idea. If some UK editor decides they prefers British spellings and changes them on an article, what's to prevent some US editor who believes otherwise from changing them back? And if edit wars brew over this, how do we decide who's right and who's wrong if we don't have a preference? If the answer is "first come, first serve", the worst solution ever to anything on a wiki, then no thanks.
#{{User|Swallow}} Per 7feetunder, this will require tweaking the manual of style and possibly lead to more edit warring. I wouldn't give anyone a reminder about this straight away, only an informal talk page message.
#{{User|Koopa con Carne}} Per all.
#{{User|TheFlameChomp}} Per 7feetunder. This is definitely a situation where I prefer informal reminders since it is completely understandable for someone to make this mistake without realizing it is a rule, but it is still against the manual of style. I oppose changing this part of the manual of style, as not having standardized spelling would ultimately lead to unneeded problems. I definitely do think immediately giving official reminders over this is too harsh, though.
#{{User|Spectrogram}} per all.
#{{User|Somethingone}} Per 2.1336metersunder.
#{{User|FanOfYoshi}} Per all.
#{{User|RSM}}changed decision after 213.36centimetersunder's comments.
#{{User|ThePowerPlayer}} Per all. An informal reminder on a userpage with a link to the explanation in the Manual of Style is enough to quell this issue while maintaining standardized spelling.

==== Comments ====
It is stated on the [[MarioWiki:Manual of Style#Spelling standardization|Manual of Style]] that the reason American spelling and names are prioritised is because the majority of readers come from North America. Just pointing out that I am from the UK though. {{User:Swallow/sig}} 20:45, August 15, 2022 (EDT)

I'm not sure exactly what this proposal is trying to accomplish. If all this is doing it as removing it specifically from the warning policy... well, whether it's listed there or not, if someone repeatedly ignores the Manual of Style, we're going to have to do something, including potentially issuing reminders/warnings (this is already covered under "Failure to follow the writing guidelines" immediately below, which makes it a bit redundant actually). To achieve the proposal's desired effect of not giving out reminders for this, it would probably have to be removed from the Manual of Style entirely, which I wouldn't support. --{{User:Waluigi Time/sig}} 21:32, August 15, 2022 (EDT)
:I feel the whole changing American to British spelling falls under a very general infraction of not following writing guidelines, and I think it doesn't need to be specified in the warning policy. It's like having a warning dedicated to people capitalizing all words in a category or article subsection. Yeah technically they shouldn't be doing it, but I don't think this guidelines is so important and needs to be clear and explicit to the point it has to be mentioned in the warning policy. {{User:Bazooka Mario/sig}} 20:32, August 17, 2022 (EDT)
::@Waluigi Time and Bazooka Mario: Would it be ok if we moved the infraction under the "Failure to follow the writing guidelines" infraction? I've added it as a possible option in case this infraction ends up staying-it looks awkward for it to stand by itself, because it's a writing guideline, right? [[User:Mari0fan100|Mari0fan100]] ([[User talk:Mari0fan100|talk]]) 22:42, August 18, 2022 (EDT)
@Somethingone: It was proposed, but then the proposer themselves cancelled it. Although we did not technically agree to being okay with British spelling before, this proposal gives an opportunity to make it happen. [[User:Mari0fan100|Mari0fan100]] ([[User talk:Mari0fan100|talk]]) 22:15, August 15, 2022 (EDT)

I want to point out one thing: choosing between British English and American English is not just a matter of spelling of words. There are still elements, such as courses or species, that are named differently in British English compared to American English. The kart, tires and courses in the ''Mario Kart'' games, including ''Mario Kart 8'', are the most prominent example, but there's also the case of the naming of all the Magikoopas as ''Kamek'' in British English, reflecting their Japanese name. Even many ''Mario & Luigi'' games were named differently in British English. Therefore the choice of one English or the other has a lot of implications, and once we decided to stay with the American English, you can expect the rest of the page to follow through to keep consistency, as a page written in British English about a subject that has a different name in British English would look rather confusing to the readers.--[[User:Mister Wu|Mister Wu]] ([[User talk:Mister Wu|talk]]) 08:50, August 19, 2022 (EDT)

@Koopa con Carne, @Spectrogram, @Somethingone: I hope I'm not coming off as rude here, but are there any reasons you suddenly decided to change your mind and completely countered this proposal? I'm sure you had great reasons, but none of the edits give a reasonable justification, nor did you give off reasons to change your votes. It seems peculiar that all of you were in massive support of this whole thing and then decided to change your minds for no given reason completely. [[User:Wikiboy10|Wikiboy10]] ([[User talk:Wikiboy10|talk]]) 08:51, August 19, 2022 (EDT)
:I know I'm not one of the people being addressed here, but it is possible for people to be convinced to change their minds if a counterargument gets brought up, which it did, and all of them cited that as their new vote reasoning. {{User:Hewer/sig}} 10:03, August 19, 2022 (EDT)
:People can veer to a different point of view if presented with good enough arguments to support it. 7feetunder had the foresight to point out some realistic consequences of this proposal’s passing, and I simply found myself agreeing with him more than with the proposal or my previous statement. {{User:Koopa con Carne/Sig}} 10:14, August 19, 2022 (EDT)
@TheFlameChomp: The points you brought motivated me to add the "Oppose, but move the infraction under the "Failure to follow the writing guidelines" infraction" as a possible option. I feel that if this infraction should stay, then it shouldn't be a standalone. Rather, I suggest that the infraction should be seen as an example of a "failure to follow the writing guidelines" and (potentially) have it moved under there. [[User:Mari0fan100|Mari0fan100]] ([[User talk:Mari0fan100|talk]]) 17:26, August 19, 2022 (EDT)
:Someone correct me if I'm wrong, but I think it might be too late to add a new option. Per rule 14, proposals can only be rewritten (which includes adding new options) within the first three days of its creation. You created this proposal at [https://www.mariowiki.com/index.php?title=MarioWiki:Proposals&diff=prev&oldid=3731212 00:15 on August 16,] and you added the new option at [https://www.mariowiki.com/index.php?title=MarioWiki:Proposals&diff=3734081&oldid=3734012 02:40 on August 19] - 2 hours and 25 minutes after three days had passed. {{User:7feetunder/sig}} 17:42, August 19, 2022 (EDT)<br>
While we're on the subject of this guideline, it has been misconstrued to mean "this is an American wiki", which is untrue; much like Wikipedia, it's an international wiki that just happens to have its servers in the US. <span style="font-family:Mario Party 2/3 Textbox">[[User:RickTommy|RickTommy]] ([[User talk:RickTommy|talk]])</span> 11:16, August 21, 2022 (EDT)

===Change "NS" to "Switch"===
{{ProposalOutcome|failed|3-7}}
I saw that the official Nintendo website officially has Nintendo Switch abbreviated "Switch". I wonder if the abbreviation "NS" is an error? I'm going to make a proposal for the change just in case the official Nintendo website is right (which are most cases is).

* All files with "NS" on their names should be renamed to have "NS" be replaced with "Switch".
** Similarly, all files with "LANS" on their names should be renamed to have "LANS" be replaced with "LA Switch".
* The template "{{tem|NS}}" should be renamed "<nowiki>{{Switch}}</nowiki>".
* The {{tem|Mario games}}, {{tem|Yoshi games}}, {{tem|Wario games}}, and {{tem|Donkey Kong games}} templates should all have the word "NS" replaced with "Switch".
* The {{tem|Button}} template should have the game system code "NS" replaced with "Switch".
* The {{tem|Media}} template should have have the codes "ns" and "nsdl" replaced by "switch" and "switchdl", respectively.
* The {{tem|Input}} template should have have the codes "nspro", "nsgcn", "nsnes", "nssnes", and "nsn64" replaced by "switchpro", "switchgcn", "switchnes", "switchsnes", and "switchn64", respectively.

'''Proposer''': {{User|Teh Other}}<br>
'''Deadline''': August 26, 2022, 23:59 GMT

====Support====
#{{User|Teh Other}} Per proposal
#{{User|RSM}} easier to understand in my opinion, people who aren't familiar with it being referred to as "NS" will have to spend time trying to find what the actual code is, basically, its less specific and more simple, its just the name rather than an abbreviation, so its easier to understand.
#{{User|Mari0fan100}}Per all, and I'm kinda surprised this was not proposed earlier.

<s>#{{User|Spectrogram}} I believe "Switch" is better. Though there probably should be another proposal dealing with this naming anarchy. GameCube's template is called "GCN" while Wii U's "Wii U", Game & Watch is "Game & Watch".</s>
====Oppose====
#{{User|Somethingone}} I would be in support of this proposal if it weren't for the filename part. It is completely unnecessary to gatekeeper every single filename across this wiki simply because it uses the "wrong" abbreviation; plenty of filenames for GameCube related material use "GC" or "GameCube" instead of "GCN" for their filenames and I don't see anyone arguing about those. It's too late by now to edit the proposal but I simply don't like the precedence of  renaming reasonable non-jokey filenames simply because they don't use the "official" abbreviation/name/whatever.
#{{User|Spectrogram}} Pretty much per Somethingone, cancel and recreate a proposal with the filename part removed, and I'll happily vote in support.
#{{User|Swallow}} Unless Porplebot could handle it, this looks like it would be more trouble than it's worth.
#{{User|Koopa con Carne}} Per Somethingone and the folks in the comments.
#{{User|TheFlameChomp}} Per Somethingone.
#{{User|Archivist Toadette}} This could honestly go either way, at least until Nintendo gives us an official stance to work with.
#{{User|Sdman213|Sdman213}} Per all.

====Comments====
The inner data of ''Mario Kart 8 Deluxe'' Booster Course Pass refer their courses with the abbreviation "nsw" ('''N'''intendo '''Sw'''itch) as the platform code, as noted [[New course#Platform codes|here]]. Probably not the ''most'' accurate thing because some of the abbreviations are only used for the Japanese versions of Mario Kart, and then there's also just "u" for the original Wii U courses, but "nsw" is one of the few ''official'' abbreviations we got for the Nintendo Switch regardless, so that's some food for thought. [[User:Arend|Arend]] ([[User talk:Arend|talk]]) 07:15, August 20, 2022 (EDT)

Can there be an option to do this without having to rename every file that uses the abbreviation? That feels excessive to me. --{{User:Waluigi Time/sig}} 13:04, August 21, 2022 (EDT)

I agree with Waluigi Time. I'd support this proposal if it didn't suggest renaming every single file with the "NS" abbreviation. Renaming the templates is easy, but searching for and adjusting every filename is far more trouble than it's worth. {{User:ThePowerPlayer/sig}} 17:30, August 21, 2022 (EDT)

I also agree with Waluigi Time. Renaming every filename usage of "NS" to "Switch" just feels like gatekeeping what filenames can use in them. I don't see anyone arguing if filenames should use "GCN", "NGC", "GC", "Nintendo GameCube", or "GameCube" for all GameCube related file names. {{User:Somethingone/sig}} 17:50, August 22, 2022 (EDT)

I went ahead and made these changes, excluding the filenames. --{{User:Porplemontage/sig}} 10:32, August 23, 2022 (EDT)
:Welp, I guess that makes this proposal pretty much pointless now, since the changes everyone agreed should be made are now already made. Unless one wants to support changing the filenames too. Or if someone wants to use "nsw" instead like I explained earlier. [[User:Arend|Arend]] ([[User talk:Arend|talk]]) 14:56, August 23, 2022 (EDT)

=== Merge unrelated to Mario objects and items in the ''Smash Bros.'' series ===
{{ProposalOutcome|passed|10-0|merge}}
Good evening!

''Smash Bros.'' series features plenty of items and objects. Most of these objects have nothing to do with Mario, and it honestly feels like reading Zelda Wiki while browsing through these wonderful articles, considering the actual amount of Mario-related objects and items is really small. Even though most of them really do not fit into Mario Wiki, there is a sizable opposition to outright removing them, which is understandable. I propose we merge (not remove!) items and objects from the ''Smash Bros.'' series that have otherwise nothing to do with Mario into two list articles: {{Fake link|List of Super Smash Bros. series objects}} and {{Fake link|List of Super Smash Bros. series items}}. They really feel out of place, especially after previous ''cut-cut-cut'' [https://www.mariowiki.com/MarioWiki:Proposals/Archive/51#Smash_Bros._Articles:_What_Stays_and_What_Goes? proposals] have passed.

Q: Why don't we merge them into list articles for each game (such as "List of ''Super Smash Bros. Ultimate'' objects")? 

A: As it turned out, the ''Smash Bros.'' series doesn't have that many objects that are exclusive to one game: most of them recur from one game to the other, it would just be repetition in most cases.

I've also compiled a list of affected articles by this proposal, from which I've also removed several gray area entries that somewhat relate to the ''Mario'' series one way or the other. The excluded entries (example: [[Party Ball (item)]]) can always be dealt with individually at a later date, as I believe they fall out of the scale of this proposal and what it's trying to achieve. Note that I do not consider an item changing color to red if Mario holds it a good justification to keep an article. This proposal also does not target the remaining enemy articles, most of which were merged a long time ago.

::'''[!]''' If you disagree with an entry in List M for whatever reason, leave a comment in the "Comments" section and I'll remove it from the list. 

If this proposal passes, the following changes will be implemented:
* All items and objects that lack connections to the ''Mario'' series will be merged into two list articles
* If a connection is found or introduced to a ''Mario'' universe, the page can always be easily reinstated
* Several seemingly unrelated to Mario gray area objects and items pages are intentionally excluded from the List M
* Merging the pages shouldn't erase information either

====List M====
It may seem like a lot, but it really isn't.

* [[Flipper (Balloon Fight)]]
* [[Orange cube]]
* [[Master Ball]]
* [[Sandbag]]
* [[Target]]
* [[Back Shield]]
* [[Beam Sword]]
* [[Banana Gun]]
* [[Arwing]]
* [[Beastball]]
* [[Beetle (item)]]
* [[Black Hole (item)]]
* [[Blast Box]]
* [[Bunny Hood]]
* [[Bomber]]
* [[Bombchu]]
* [[Capsule (Super Smash Bros. series)]]
* [[Cucco]] (wasnt merged with Smash Run enemies previously only because it's an item)
* [[Fairy Bottle]]
* [[Pellet]]
* [[Falcon Flyer]]
* [[Drill (item)]]
* [[Dragoon]]
* [[Deku Nut]]
* [[Death's Scythe]]
* [[Daybreak]]
* [[Fake Smash Ball]]
* [[Franklin Badge]]
* [[Gooey Bomb]]
* [[Gust Bellows]]
* [[Killing Edge]]
* [[Killer Eye]]
* [[Home-Run Bat]]
* [[Hocotate Ship]]
* [[Heart Container]]
* [[Healing Sprout]]
* [[Healing Field]]
* [[Pitfall]]
* [[Mr. Saturn]]
* [[Ore Club]]
* [[Motion-Sensor Bomb]]
* [[Maxim Tomato]]
* [[Master Ball]]
* [[Lip's Stick]] (suggested to also be included in the list by [[User:7feetunder]]. Add a comment if you disagree with its inclusion)
* [[Pok%C3%A9 Ball]]
* [[Ramblin' Evil Mushroom]]
* [[Rage Blaster]]
* [[Ray Gun]]
* [[Rolling Crate]] (even Smash Wiki has crates merged. We don't)
* [[Rocket Belt]]
* [[Screw Attack]]
* [[Smash Ball]]
* [[Special Flag]]
* [[Smoke Ball]]
* [[Subspace Bomb]]
* [[Food]]
* [[Steel Diver]]
* [[X Bomb]]
* [[Warp Star]]
* [[Timer (item)]]
* [[Superspicy Curry]]
* [[Smash Skiff]]
* [[Smash Coin]]
* [[Pleiades]] (even Smash Bros. wiki has it merged, it serves ZERO in-game functionality, no proposal should even be needed to have it merged.)
* [[Parasol]] (as suggested by [[User:Ray Trace]], it could redirect to [[Peach's Parasol]])
* [[Cloaking Device]]
* [[Fan (Super Smash Bros. series)]]
* [[Smart Bomb]]
* [[Team Healer]]
* [[Cracker Launcher]]
* [[Stock Ball]]
* [[Trophy Stand]]
* [[Staff (Kid Icarus)]]

==== Notable excluded entries ====
These pages will remain '''untouched''' if the proposal passes. Note that this isn't a full list, just the more notable pages:

* [[Cargo]]
* [[Star Rod (Kirby)]]
* [[Sticker (Super Smash Bros. Brawl)]]

That's about it. As I said above, if you disagree with a certain entry, I can exclude it from the list, there's always a good chance I've missed something.

'''Proposer''': {{User|Spectrogram}}<br>
'''Deadline''': August 26, 2022, 23:59 GMT

====Merge the List M entries====
#{{User|Spectrogram}} Mario Wiki
#{{user|7feetunder}} As someone who has always been pro-trimming in regards to ''Smash'' coverage, per proposal.
#{{user|Glowsquid}} Ceterum autem censeo Smash Bros esse delenda
#{{User|ShootingStar7X}} Per proposal.
#{{User|Platform}} Per proposal.
#{{User|TheFlameChomp}} Per proposal, I am definitely supportive of trimming more non-Mario ''Smash'' coverage.
#{{User|Somethingone}} I honestly prefer this list idea over any other idea, as not only does it help cut down on our ''Smash'' bloat but it also helps us preserve the information at the same time.
#{{User|Power Flotzo}} I'm all for removing tenuously-related Smash articles. Per proposal.
#{{User|ThePowerPlayer}} Per proposal.
#{{User|Archivist Toadette}} No objections here either. (Honestly though, I thought [[Timer (item)|Timer]] was part of the [[Stop Watch]] article already.)

====No change====

====Comments====
Why is Lip's Stick excluded? AFAIK its only relation to ''Mario'' is that it was in a game that ''became'' a ''Mario'' game; it doesn't actually have anything to do with ''Mario''. It's not like we have an article on Lip, and even our article on ''Panel de Pon'' itself was merged with ''[[Tetris Attack]]'' via proposal. {{User:7feetunder/sig}} 17:06, August 19, 2022 (EDT)
: I've included it on the list along with a few other cameo-only items and objects appearances. Have a look and reply if you disagree with some new entries, I still have two days to edit the list. [[User:Spectrogram|Spectrogram]] ([[User talk:Spectrogram|talk]]) 11:30, August 20, 2022 (EDT) 
Parasol should have honestly been reworked in the first place, so in case of a move to a redirect, the page should probably redirect to Peach's Parasol. {{User:Ray Trace/sig}} 17:38, August 19, 2022 (EDT)

Question: how would the list articles look like? Would it be a standard table-with-text list or would we make it like the [[Subspace Army]] page where the articles are turned into page segments complete with images and NIOLs? Also, it  seems that [[Mr. Saturn]] ''does'' appear as an unlockable costume in SMM, so how would that information be moved? Other than that, I like this approach at remodeling our Smash coverage. {{User:Somethingone/sig}} 11:37, August 20, 2022 (EDT)
:Great questions! I think the way [[Subspace Army]] enemies are listed is a better way to approach this situation. When it comes to the ''Mario Maker'' costumes, all of them are already covered at [[Costume Mario]], including Mr. Saturn. [[User:Spectrogram|Spectrogram]] ([[User talk:Spectrogram|talk]]) 11:41, August 20, 2022 (EDT)
::Yes, but I personally feel like the fact that Mr. Saturn appears as a costume in SMM is enough to exclude it by this proposal's standards, especially since the only reason the Star Rod from Kirby is excluded is because it appears as an item in one issue of Super Mario-kun. {{User:Somethingone/sig}} 11:48, August 20, 2022 (EDT)
::: Good point. I'll exclude it from the list, as well as [[Arwing]] for the exact same reason. [[User:Spectrogram|Spectrogram]] ([[User talk:Spectrogram|talk]]) 11:53, August 20, 2022 (EDT)

"Yes, but I personally feel like the fact that Mr. Saturn appears as a costume in SMM is enough to exclude it by this proposal's standards,"

I don't. We [[MarioWiki:Proposals/Archive/53#Merge_Assist_Trophies_that_have_made_minor_appearances_in_the_Mario_franchise|previously established]] appearances in stuff like WarioWare microgames or other crossovers wasn't enough to give characters like Mother Brain their own page, and also that the Costume Mario appearances are too insubstantial to warrant separate articles. The Star Rod stuff is different, because it's actually plot relevant to that Mario-kun volume. --[[User:Glowsquid|Glowsquid]] ([[User talk:Glowsquid|talk]]) 12:28, August 20, 2022 (EDT)
:Fair point. {{User:Somethingone/sig}} 12:50, August 20, 2022 (EDT)
:: Should I readd the two excluded entries back into the List M? [[User:Spectrogram|Spectrogram]] ([[User talk:Spectrogram|talk]]) 12:54, August 20, 2022 (EDT)
:::I mean it's your proposal. Though my personal opinion would be "yes". --[[User:Glowsquid|Glowsquid]] ([[User talk:Glowsquid|talk]]) 13:00, August 20, 2022 (EDT)

I assume the F-Zero Racers aren't on this list because of ''Mario''-related comic cameos. In that case, would the Arwing's cameo in ''Super Mario RPG'' be sufficient to keep the article? It does seem a touch more notable than the Wolfen. [[User:LinkTheLefty|LinkTheLefty]] ([[User talk:LinkTheLefty|talk]]) 21:59, August 21, 2022 (EDT)
:I didn't know this article even existed, but from what it seems it can just barely qualify to not be included in this proposal. It is now too late to change the list anyway. [[User:Spectrogram|Spectrogram]] ([[User talk:Spectrogram|talk]]) 01:29, August 22, 2022 (EDT)
::It appears to play a role in the story, even though it's somewhat minor. We can organize a new TPP if this one passes. [[User:Spectrogram|Spectrogram]] ([[User talk:Spectrogram|talk]]) 09:14, August 23, 2022 (EDT)