Editing MarioWiki:Featured articles/Unfeature/N2/Wii

__NOTOC__
===[[{{SUBPAGENAME}}]]===
{{UNFANOMFAIL
|nominated=18:21, 12 Feb 2016 (CST)
|lastedit=18:21, 12 Mar 2016 (CST)
}}
==== Remove Featured Article Status ====
#{{user|Wildgoosespeeder}} See comments section.
#{{user|MarioKid}} It seems fine to me.
#{{user|Reboot}} Zap it. Lots of instances of unclear or outright horrid prose.

==== Keep Featured Article Status ====

==== Removal of Support/Oppose Votes ====

==== Comments ====
First off, I am not very clear why {{tem|rewrite}} has been added to the article. No reason was specified. Maybe someone with more writing expertise can examine why it is there and then specify the reason. Also details about the [[Wii Message Board]] are missing, as I just added that section to the article and added {{tem|more images}} and {{tem|stub}}. --{{User:Wildgoosespeeder/sig}} 19:21, 12 February 2016 (EST)

Not sure if the nomination will pass or not, but I am definitely not fond of the layout of the peripherals section at all. {{User:Bazooka Mario/sig}} 19:56, 3 April 2016 (EDT)
:A random IP added it, I see no reason for it to be there. If the peripherals section needs a rewrite, we can add the template there but I'll remove it from the top of the article for the time being. --{{User:Henry Tucayo Clay/sig}} 19:58, 3 April 2016 (EDT)

::The [[Wii#Models|Models section]] needs a rewrite too. For example:
:::''As its name suggests, the Wii Mini is the smallest model of the Wii, and shares several features with the Wii Family Edition such as the incompatibility to play Nintendo Gamecube and its accessories. It also does not have online features and several built in software, such as the Photo Channel and the Weather Channel, similar to the Wii Mode on the Wii U."''
::An incompatability is a "feature"? "It also does not have...several built in software"? I think {{tem|Rewrite}} may have been fair... - [[User:Reboot|Reboot]] ([[User talk:Reboot|talk]]) 22:09, 3 April 2016 (EDT)
:::If it's some sections needing a rewrite as opposed to the whole article, the template would be better placed in the sections. --{{User:Henry Tucayo Clay/sig}} 22:16, 3 April 2016 (EDT)