Editing MarioWiki:Featured articles/Unfeature/N1/Wario

From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.

Latest revision Your text
Line 1: Line 1:
__NOTOC__
__NOTOC__
===[[{{SUBPAGENAME}}]]===
===[[{{SUBPAGENAME}}]]===
{{UNFANOMFAIL|nominated=13:21, 8 March 2010 (GMT)|lastedit=19:49, 14 August 2010}}
{{UNFANOMSTAT
|nominated=13:21, 8 March 2010 (GMT)
|passed=<!--When it is 5-0, put the time (such as 12:10, 11 December 2009) of the fifth support/removal of last opposet  by copying it from the history of the page.-->
}}
==== Remove Featured Article Status ====
==== Remove Featured Article Status ====
#{{User|Reversinator}} Where do I begin? We have some really short sections, lots of sections missing images, and some useless information. Examples: <br>1. Mario Golf series, Mario Football series, WarioWare, Inc.: Mega Party Game$. <br>2. Just scroll through the article and see for yourself.<br>3. "In the past, it's been suggested that Wario was actually Foreman Spike, due to similarities in appearance. That theory has been debunked, though some people still believe that Wario is based on Spike."
#{{User|Reversinator}} Where do I begin? We have some really short sections, lots of sections missing images, and some useless information. Examples: <br>1. Mario Golf series, Mario Football series, WarioWare, Inc.: Mega Party Game$. <br>2. Just scroll through the article and see for yourself.<br>3. "In the past, it's been suggested that Wario was actually Foreman Spike, due to similarities in appearance. That theory has been debunked, though some people still believe that Wario is based on Spike."
#{{User|Fawfulfury65}} - Many sections, like the Mario Golf, WarioWare, and Mario Strikers series sections, need expanded. I won't vote to keep it featured until that stuff is fixed.
#{{User|Fawfulfury65}} - Many sections, like the Mario Golf, WarioWare, and Mario Strikers series sections, need expanded. I won't vote to keep it featured until that stuff is fixed.
#{{User|KS3}} Per all the reasons Revesinator said.
#{{User|Commander Code-8}} There are too many areas that give us no information whatsoever, such as WarioWare: Snapped. So per FawfulFury65
#{{User|Commander Code-8}} There are too many areas that give us no information whatsoever, such as WarioWare: Snapped. So per FawfulFury65
#{{User|Yoshi104}} per all.
#{{User|Bowser's luma}} Reading it does not seem like I am reading a featured article. Per all.


==== Keep Featured Article Status ====
==== Keep Featured Article Status ====
#{{User|Gamefreak75}} - All of those are easily fixable sections and you could've taken the third one out yourself. Heck, I'll do it later. It's nice and long and has plenty of pics. Keep the FA status!
#{{User|Gamefreak75}} - All of those are easily fixable sections and you could've taken the third one out yourself. Heck, I'll do it later. It's nice and long and has plenty of pics. Keep the FA status!
#{{User|LeftyGreenMario}} As much as I hate this smelly blob of cholesterol fat, I think it should be kept featured. This article has no SERIOUS problems.
#{{User|LeftyGreenMario}} As much as I hate this smelly blob of cholesterol fat, I think it should be kept featured. The problems you mentioned are easily fixable. But some sections do need to be longer (Super Mario Strikers/Football says look at this fatso, please.) Otherwise, this article has no serious problems.
#{{User|BabyLuigiOnFire}} Though he CAN suck in black holes, rip the fabric of time and space, etc., per all. You can fix them yourself, unless you're very busy doing stuff to other articles.
#{{User|BabyLuigiOnFire}} Though he CAN suck in black holes, rip the fabric of time and space, etc., per all. You can fix them yourself, unless you're very busy doing stuff to other articles.
#{{User|Plumber}} Per LeftyGreenMario.
#{{User|Raphaelraven497}} per my comment below.
#{{User|Nerfman2227}} Per LeftyGreenMario.
#{{User|Mario Fan 123}} It's an excellent article. Various images, no spoilers, really MUCH text... Please, let it with the FA status! For the Super Mario Wiki!
#{{User|Steam5}} Per LeftyGreenMario.
#{{User|Firecat}} I agree with Mario Fan 123 here. Besides that, I'm a Wario fan!
#[[User:Lu-igi board|Lu-igi board]] per all
#{{User|Fuzzipede27}} I hate wario but, it's a really good article.


==== Removal of Support/Oppose Votes ====
==== Removal of Support/Oppose Votes ====
=====Support Votes=====
=====Oppose Votes=====
'''Mario Fan 123'''
#{{User|KS3}} Just pleading to keep it (mercy); just says an excellent article (This Is not an FA nomination, this is an FA unfeature nomination).
'''Firecat'''
#{{User|KS3}} saying that you are a wario fan doesn't make it a valid oppose reason
'''BabyLuigiOnFire'''
#{{User|KS3}} Per Time Q's comment.
'''Ralphaelraven497'''
#{{User|KS3}} Per Time Q's comment.
'''LeftyGreenMario'''
#{{User|KS3}} Per Time Q's comment.
'''Gamefreak75'''
#{{User|KS3}} Per Time Q's comment.


==== Comments ====
==== Comments ====
Line 33: Line 53:


:Can we end this now? {{User|Gamefreak75}}
:Can we end this now? {{User|Gamefreak75}}
@KS3: I removed all of the "removal of opposes" you mad e for several reasons. Firecat and Mariofan123 both sadi that the article was fine. Sure, they added a bit, but that wasnt their major vote. For me, my comment is EXACTLY the same as Time Q's, just directed at YOU!! Same with LGM, BLOF, and GF75. {{User|Raphaelraven497}}
:I added them back. Basically, the opposers' task is to prove the supporters' points wrong. Saying that "the article is fine" doesn't even refer to the supporters' points. Anyone can say that, which would mean that no article can be unfeatured. If you think that certain votes are invalid, address it in the comments section. - On a different note, I think we should check if this nomination is even up to date. Haven't the problems Reversinator pointed out already been fixed? {{User|Time Q}}
::Basically, all of KS3's removals are invalid and I'm pretty sure the problem has been fixed ages ago.{{User|Gamefreak75}}
:::Missing sections, and there are still short sections, (ie; the ones that Revesinatior mentioned. {{User|KS3}}
::::The Strikers section cannot be expanded and the WWMM section only needs slight expansion. Otherwise, this is nothing to unfeature for. I'm pretty busy though. {{User|Gamefreak75}}
Well, KS3 has been banned, so we should remove his vote and vote removal votes. {{User|Emperor Yoshi}}
:I was about to do that right when you said that. :P I've already done it. {{User|Gamefreak75}}

Please note that all contributions to the Super Mario Wiki are considered to be released under the Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported license (see MarioWiki:Copyrights for details). If you don't want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then don't submit it here. You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource. Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!

Cancel Editing help (opens in new window)

Templates used on this page: