Editing MarioWiki:Featured articles/Unfeature/N1/Toad Town
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
| Latest revision | Your text | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
__NOTOC__ | __NOTOC__ | ||
===[[{{#titleparts:{{PAGENAME}}||4}}]]=== | ===[[{{#titleparts:{{PAGENAME}}||4}}]]=== | ||
{{ | {{UNFANOMSTAT | ||
|nominated=08:18, 20 August 2014 (EDT) | |||
|passed=15:53, 21 August 2014 (EDT) | |||
}} | |||
==== Remove Featured Article Status ==== | ==== Remove Featured Article Status ==== | ||
#{{User|Ninelevendo}} Yet another Unfeature nomination, I know, but this article is just horrible. I'm sorry to say, but it's full of one liners, useless section and badly organised sections. The Paper Mario section and Mario & Luigi sections look OK, but the rest is pretty bad. There's a section about a mention of the town that is good, yet it somehow is able to triple the amount of writing in three games that it makes an actual appearance in. Anything after the History section is just a bunch of lists. The trivia could also be inc. and some of it isn't even needed. There are much better Unfeatured articles than this. | #{{User|Ninelevendo}} Yet another Unfeature nomination, I know, but this article is just horrible. I'm sorry to say, but it's full of one liners, useless section and badly organised sections. The Paper Mario section and Mario & Luigi sections look OK, but the rest is pretty bad. There's a section about a mention of the town that is good, yet it somehow is able to triple the amount of writing in three games that it makes an actual appearance in. Anything after the History section is just a bunch of lists. The trivia could also be inc. and some of it isn't even needed. There are much better Unfeatured articles than this. | ||
| Line 19: | Line 20: | ||
:Why? These articles are truly flawed? While there ''is'' a limit on nominations (enacted a few years ago because one user kept nominating subpar articles), Ninelevendo isn't breaking any limits, and his reasons for unfeaturing are legit. I have no problem with this. {{User:Mario/sig}} 20:07, 23 August 2014 (EDT) | :Why? These articles are truly flawed? While there ''is'' a limit on nominations (enacted a few years ago because one user kept nominating subpar articles), Ninelevendo isn't breaking any limits, and his reasons for unfeaturing are legit. I have no problem with this. {{User:Mario/sig}} 20:07, 23 August 2014 (EDT) | ||
::Just out of curiosity, where is the rule saying there's a limit? I don't remember having seen it before.--[[User:Vommack|Vommack]] ([[User talk:Vommack|talk]]) 17:47, 24 August 2014 (EDT) | ::Just out of curiosity, where is the rule saying there's a limit? I don't remember having seen it before.--[[User:Vommack|Vommack]] ([[User talk:Vommack|talk]]) 17:47, 24 August 2014 (EDT) | ||
