Editing MarioWiki:Featured articles/Unfeature/N1/Super Smash Bros.

__NOTOC__
'''Super Smash Bros. became unfeatured at 15:58, 14 May 2010.'''

===[[{{SUBPAGENAME}}]]===
==== Remove Featured Article Status ====
#{{User|LeftyGreenMario}} At a first glance, this article is a long article with plenty of pictures. At a closer glance, though, there is a slew of grammar errors (I even corrected a few "you's".) Not only that, but the information on each character/pokeball pokemon/stage are vague one-two liners. (''Link is a character with medium weight, strength and speed. He uses his sword to attack.'') '''I didn't know he uses his sword to attack!'''  The stages in single-player mode looks really messy too. The article is not very well organized either. The best of what Mario Wiki has to offer? I've seen better articles.
#{{User|BabyLuigiOnFire}} Even though Super Smash Bros. is an awesome game with awesome explosion noises and tornadoes, I have to say this is not a very great article. The section Non-playable characters list such characters twice already. And I don't see what's the point of having list of Pokemon in this article when it's already covered in [[Pokémon|this article]] (though it's relatively easy to fix). The rest of the reasons I have, LGM covered it.
#{{user|Coincollector}} - Agree. Some sections repeat the same info (playable chracters, non-playable, etc...). The reception section needs a hand too.
#{{User|Gamefreak75}} Unfortuantely, I have to agree with everyone.
#{{User|KS3}} Per all.
#{{User|Commander Code-8}} Despite my love for the Smash Bros. series, this just has mess, mess, mess, more mess, and a boring list of pokemon.
#[[User:Luigi=awesome|Luigi=awesome]] Same as above.

==== Keep Featured Article Status ====

==== Removal of Support/Oppose Votes ====

==== Comments ====
I nominated the article at 05:25, 7 May 2010. Can someone add that at the top of the page? {{User|LeftyGreenMario}}
:Urgh...{{User|BabyLuigiOnFire}}

BLOF, I wouldn't want to go to another page just to see the pokemon. They are fine here. All they need, though, is expansion and possibly a rewriting. {{User|LeftyGreenMario}}
:I could just easily copy pasta that information from that article with absolutely no effort at all!!!! :( {{User|BabyLuigiOnFire}}