Editing MarioWiki:Featured articles/Unfeature/N1/Super Mario Galaxy
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
| Latest revision | Your text | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
__NOTOC__ | __NOTOC__ | ||
===[[{{#titleparts:{{PAGENAME}}||4}}]]=== | ===[[{{#titleparts:{{PAGENAME}}||4}}]]=== | ||
{{ | {{UNFANOMSTAT | ||
|nominated=20:56, 24 May 2014 (EDT) | |||
|passed=<!--When it is 5-0, put the time (such as 12:10, 11 December 2009) of the fifth support/removal of last opposet by copying it from the history of the page.--> | |||
}} | |||
==== Remove Featured Article Status ==== | ==== Remove Featured Article Status ==== | ||
#{{User|Mario}} I understand how this article is featured. Despite this, this article's greatest glaring flaw is its presentation. The plot section is too long, too excessively detailed, so I added a rewrite template very recently (just before this nomination). The controls section is a complete mess, inaccessible and most likely confusing for the reader. The section also has irrelevant information, like the last paragraph where it talks about unlocking Luigi. In the Galaxies section, the way the table is organized is pretentious and confusing; instead of efficiently providing information, it makes it hard to read. The table in the items section is sloppy, and its accompanying "location" section is not only pointless, but silly, trite, and hard to read. Minor problems include the cheap incorporation of the staff page to fill an empty section. If this is the best Mario Wiki has to offer, then this wiki doesn't know how to present its information cleanly. | #{{User|Mario}} I understand how this article is featured. Despite this, this article's greatest glaring flaw is its presentation. The plot section is too long, too excessively detailed, so I added a rewrite template very recently (just before this nomination). The controls section is a complete mess, inaccessible and most likely confusing for the reader. The section also has irrelevant information, like the last paragraph where it talks about unlocking Luigi. In the Galaxies section, the way the table is organized is pretentious and confusing; instead of efficiently providing information, it makes it hard to read. The table in the items section is sloppy, and its accompanying "location" section is not only pointless, but silly, trite, and hard to read. Minor problems include the cheap incorporation of the staff page to fill an empty section. If this is the best Mario Wiki has to offer, then this wiki doesn't know how to present its information cleanly. | ||
#{{User|Ashley and Red}}To be honest, yesterday I took a look at this article and was think.of unfeature it, but you have many.more reasons yhan.me, @Mario. I also should state that it is a mess: Tables that are hard to understand, <s>and the start is tooooooooooooooooooooo much long!! </s> Per Mario, anyway. | #{{User|Ashley and Red}}To be honest, yesterday I took a look at this article and was think.of unfeature it, but you have many.more reasons yhan.me, @Mario. I also should state that it is a mess: Tables that are hard to understand, <s>and the start is tooooooooooooooooooooo much long!! </s> Per Mario, anyway. | ||
==== Keep Featured Article Status ==== | ==== Keep Featured Article Status ==== | ||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
:[[Super Mario Bros. 2]], for example, has a longer start section, and it's featured. {{User:Mario/sig}} 01:59, 25 May 2014 (EDT) | :[[Super Mario Bros. 2]], for example, has a longer start section, and it's featured. {{User:Mario/sig}} 01:59, 25 May 2014 (EDT) | ||
::I looked through this and I think that it's fine. [[User:Yoshilover76|Yoshilover76]] ([[User talk:Yoshilover76|talk]]) 21:58, 27 May 2014 (EDT) | ::I looked through this and I think that it's fine. [[User:Yoshilover76|Yoshilover76]] ([[User talk:Yoshilover76|talk]]) 21:58, 27 May 2014 (EDT) | ||
