Editing MarioWiki:Featured articles/Unfeature/N1/Mario Power Tennis
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
__NOTOC__ | __NOTOC__ | ||
===[[{{#titleparts:{{PAGENAME}}||4}}]]=== | ===[[{{#titleparts:{{PAGENAME}}||4}}]]=== | ||
{{ | {{UNFANOMSTAT | ||
|nominated=13:16, 6 May 2012 (EDT) | |nominated=13:16, 6 May 2012 (EDT) | ||
|passed= | |passed=<!--When it is 5-0, put the time (such as 12:10, 11 December 2009) of the fifth support/removal of last opposet by copying it from the history of the page.--> | ||
}} | }} | ||
==== Remove Featured Article Status ==== | ==== Remove Featured Article Status ==== | ||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
#{{User|Matik2002}} I agree with Humbug - image quality is bad. | #{{User|Matik2002}} I agree with Humbug - image quality is bad. | ||
#{{User|Commander Code-8}} At first I didn't think this was a major problem but further investigation showed that a lot of the images are pretty bad quality | #{{User|Commander Code-8}} At first I didn't think this was a major problem but further investigation showed that a lot of the images are pretty bad quality | ||
==== Keep Featured Article Status ==== | ==== Keep Featured Article Status ==== | ||
Line 24: | Line 23: | ||
Could you please show me an image tagged with the <nowiki>{{image-quality}}</nowiki> template while having better quality than the ones in the article? Otherwise, I think the quality of the images are good enough, and they are comparable to screenshots in other featured articles. They aren't terrible that you can't see what is in the image clearly. Bad images would be taken by a regular camera on a TV screen, or they're incredibly small. All of the current ones do not fit in that category. So, in that case, I will oppose this nomination if you can't show me a better picture tagged with that template. {{User|LeftyGreenMario}} | Could you please show me an image tagged with the <nowiki>{{image-quality}}</nowiki> template while having better quality than the ones in the article? Otherwise, I think the quality of the images are good enough, and they are comparable to screenshots in other featured articles. They aren't terrible that you can't see what is in the image clearly. Bad images would be taken by a regular camera on a TV screen, or they're incredibly small. All of the current ones do not fit in that category. So, in that case, I will oppose this nomination if you can't show me a better picture tagged with that template. {{User|LeftyGreenMario}} | ||