Editing MarioWiki:Featured articles/Unfeature/N1/King K. Rool

__NOTOC__
===[[{{#titleparts:{{PAGENAME}}||4}}]]===
{{UNFANOMSTAT
|nominated=21:30, 12 June 2011
|passed=<!--When it is 5-0, put the time (such as 12:10, 11 December 2009) of the fifth support/removal of last opposet  by copying it from the history of the page.-->
}}
==== Remove Featured Article Status ====
#{{User|DKPetey99}} I know I didn't make this nomination, '''but''' the tense is not correct, it's written in the past tense.

==== Keep Featured Article Status ====
#{{User|MrConcreteDonkey}}: Request for unfeaturing lacks any kind of reason.
#{{User|UltraMario3000}} Per MCD.
#{{User|Mario Bros.!}} Per the donkey made of concrete.
#{{User|KoopaStrikerCharged}} I think that it should keep the status because sure it's written in the past tense, but anyone can fix it. In fact, I might even start fixing it myself.

==== Removal of Support/Oppose Votes ====

==== Comments ====
WTF? Well, the tense isn't consistent. I hope Superrewinder isn't a mindless user nominating this for no reason. {{User|LeftyGreenMario}}
@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 __NOTOC__
 ===[[{{#titleparts:{{PAGENAME}}||4}}]]===
-{{UNFANOMFAIL
+{{UNFANOMSTAT
 |nominated=21:30, 12 June 2011
-|lastedit= 17:57, 31 January 2012 (EDT)
+|passed=<!--When it is 5-0, put the time (such as 12:10, 11 December 2009) of the fifth support/removal of last opposet  by copying it from the history of the page.-->
-|nosupport=true}}
+}}
 ==== Remove Featured Article Status ====
-#{{User|DKPetey99}} I know I didn't make this nomination, '''but''' the tense is not correct, it's written in the past tense. Also, most sections are missing images. King K. Rool also appeared in one Super Mario-Kun comic. Thus the history is incomplete, meaning it can't stay featured.
+#{{User|DKPetey99}} I know I didn't make this nomination, '''but''' the tense is not correct, it's written in the past tense.
-#{{User|Thejfh1999}} It needs more images.
 ==== Keep Featured Article Status ====
-#{{User|MrConcreteDonkey}}: Request for unfeaturing by original requester lacked any kind of reason. Now, the minor problems are fixed, so I don't see the problem. This article contains as much information as I believe it possibly can, and I'm sure others can agree with me.
+#{{User|MrConcreteDonkey}}: Request for unfeaturing lacks any kind of reason.
 #{{User|UltraMario3000}} Per MCD.
+#{{User|Mario Bros.!}} Per the donkey made of concrete.
 #{{User|KoopaStrikerCharged}} I think that it should keep the status because sure it's written in the past tense, but anyone can fix it. In fact, I might even start fixing it myself.
-#{{User|Dr Javelin}} Fixed a couple of tenses. Looks good to me.
-#{{User|New Super Mario}} Per MCD
-#{{User|Stelios7}} Per MCD! :D
-#{{User|GEX}}Per MCD
-#{{User|Mario Bros.!}} Rewrite template GONE! I change my vote.
-#{{User|Jman98}} Per MCD
-#{{User|Supremo78}} All templates gone. I change my vote.
-#{{User|B.wilson}} Per MrConcreteDonkey.
-#{{User|Marwikedor}} Per all
-#{{User|Commander Code-8}} I don't see anything wrong with this article. Per all
 ==== Removal of Support/Oppose Votes ====
-'''MrConcreteDonkey'''
-#{{User|DKPetey99}} Now there is reasons.
-'''KoopaStrikerCharged'''
-#{{User|DKPetey99}} All of the rest of the page is written in past tense.
-'''Dr Javelin'''
-#{{User|DKPetey99}} All tense isn't fixed. And no, it is not good yet.
-'''DKPetey99'''
-#{{User|MrConcreteDonkey}} - The tenses and other problems are fixed. Also, could you explain how it is in such a "horrible" shape. And please explain what issue of Super Mario-Kun he appeared in, and confirm it, because "I think" isn't enough.
 ==== Comments ====
 WTF? Well, the tense isn't consistent. I hope Superrewinder isn't a mindless user nominating this for no reason. {{User|LeftyGreenMario}}
-:That user didn't vote too, so I have a feeling Superrewinder did nominate for no reason. {{user|Mario jc}}
-Well I have a reason and we can't just ignore the fact that the article is in horrible shape. {{User|DKPetey99}}
-:No, it's not in '''horrible''' shape. It's in great shape. {{User|MrConcreteDonkey}}
-I noticed that this article will be featured on August 20, 2011, and yet it's being requested to be unfeatured.  Something doesn't seem right. {{User|M&SG}}
-@Pdjr9000, Uh.. I don't know where you've been, but any article can become unfeatured.. {{User|Supremo78}}
-:Any article can be unfeatured if it doesn't maintain the requirements needed to stay featured. {{User|M&SG}}