Editing MarioWiki:Featured articles/Unfeature/N1/Kart
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
| Latest revision | Your text | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
__NOTOC__ | __NOTOC__ | ||
===[[{{ | ===[[{{#titleparts:{{PAGENAME}}||4}}]]=== | ||
{{ | {{UNFANOMSTAT | ||
|nominated= | |nominated=<!--Sign with FIVE tildes(~) here to put the exact date of the nomination. --> | ||
| | |passed=<!--When it is 5-0, put the time (such as 12:10, 11 December 2009) of the fifth support/removal of last opposet by copying it from the history of the page.--> | ||
}} | }} | ||
==== Remove Featured Article Status ==== | ==== Remove Featured Article Status ==== | ||
# {{User|Joseph}}It is much to the series' but I don't think it will be good enough to become featured. | |||
==== Keep Featured Article Status ==== | ==== Keep Featured Article Status ==== | ||
#{{User|Randombob-omb4761}} Why? It looks fine. | #{{User|Randombob-omb4761}} Why? It looks fine. | ||
#{{User|Baby Luigi}} Can you STOP making UNFA's because they're "important" to the Mario series? [http://www.mariowiki.com/MarioWiki:Featured_Articles#Featured_Article_standards WHERE in the rules or ANYWHERE does it say "this article MUST be about an important item"???] | #{{User|Baby Luigi}} Can you STOP making UNFA's because they're "important" to the Mario series? [http://www.mariowiki.com/MarioWiki:Featured_Articles#Featured_Article_standards WHERE in the rules or ANYWHERE does it say "this article MUST be about an important item"???] | ||
#{{User|Tails777}} I | #{{User|Tails777}} I'm sure I'm not the first to say this, but the subject's connection to the series has nothing to do with featured status. If the quality is good then it can be featured. There is nothing wrong with this article so I see no reason to unfeature it. | ||
==== Removal of Support/Oppose Votes ==== | ==== Removal of Support/Oppose Votes ==== | ||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
==== Comments ==== | ==== Comments ==== | ||
The point of unfeaturing nominations is to point out fundamental flaws in the article's content (writing style, presentation, completeness, images). Notability can be a valid argument, but if the subject isn't notable, such article wouldn't exist anyway. Also, you should specify how this article "isn't good enough". Is it poorly written? Does it look cluttered? Is the information outdated? Is there reasonable coverage? Are there any improvement templates? Those are the basic questions you have to ask first before making any sort of nomination here. {{User:Mario/sig}} 21:25, 22 July 2014 (EDT) | The point of unfeaturing nominations is to point out fundamental flaws in the article's content (writing style, presentation, completeness, images). Notability can be a valid argument, but if the subject isn't notable, such article wouldn't exist anyway. Also, you should specify how this article "isn't good enough". Is it poorly written? Does it look cluttered? Is the information outdated? Is there reasonable coverage? Are there any improvement templates? Those are the basic questions you have to ask first before making any sort of nomination here. {{User:Mario/sig}} 21:25, 22 July 2014 (EDT) | ||
