Editing MarioWiki:Featured articles/Unfeature/N1/Goomba
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
__NOTOC__ | __NOTOC__ | ||
===[[{{SUBPAGENAME}}]]=== | ===[[{{SUBPAGENAME}}]]=== | ||
{{ | {{UNFANOMSTAT | ||
|nominated=08:07, 30 March 2011 (EDT) | |nominated=08:07, 30 March 2011 (EDT) | ||
| | |passed=21:24, 31 March 2011<!--When it is 5-0, put the time (such as 12:10, 11 December 2009) of the fifth support/removal of last opposet by copying it from the history of the page.--> | ||
}} | }} | ||
==== Remove Featured Article Status ==== | ==== Remove Featured Article Status ==== | ||
#{{User|Reversinator}} The first problem is the tense template. Having these templates on FAs won't work. Second, the background section. Is it really necessary? Couldn't that section be merged to Super Mario Bros.? Third, a few of the sections are missing images, like Super Mario Galaxy 2 and the SSB series. Since the images are available, they should be added. Fourth, the Goomba Leadership and Allegiances section. No other article I can find has a section like this, so why do we have it? Fifth the inconcistency in the Mario Party section. How come only Mario Party 4 and Mario Party DS get a section while other MP games that had Goombas in them (like Mario Party 7) don't even get mentioned? Sixth, the name origins section. No other article has it, and it's speculative, so why do we have it? | |||
#{{User|SWFlash}} | |||
#{{User|Yoshidude99}} | |||
#{{User|Bowser's luma}} | |||
#{{User|Fawfulfury65}} | |||
==== Keep Featured Article Status ==== | ==== Keep Featured Article Status ==== | ||
#{{User|LeftyGreenMario}} I fixed most, if not, all the problems you have mentioned. The "Name Analysis" section should not be removed because it is based on facts, not speculation. The tense template is gone. The Mario Party section is updated with all the information I can find in all the Mario Party games. I deleted the "allegiances" section. The article has plenty of images; it can use more images, but that should not mean it should be unfeatured. The background section is implemented in the first game it appeared. The whole article is rewritten to be informative and not like a story. There, I objected to all your reasons to unfeature. If you see any more problems, please mention them or I will have to vote to remove your vote. This article can stay featured. I would like to point out that the four supporters above me MUST have a reason for voting. This is directly quote from the rules: ''Not only opposers, but also supporters need to give reasons for their vote. This is due to the fact that what they are doing basically is opposing the FA status of an article, and this needs to be justified.'' | #{{User|LeftyGreenMario}} I fixed most, if not, all the problems you have mentioned. The "Name Analysis" section should not be removed because it is based on facts, not speculation. The tense template is gone. The Mario Party section is updated with all the information I can find in all the Mario Party games. I deleted the "allegiances" section. The article has plenty of images; it can use more images, but that should not mean it should be unfeatured. The background section is implemented in the first game it appeared. The whole article is rewritten to be informative and not like a story. There, I objected to all your reasons to unfeature. If you see any more problems, please mention them or I will have to vote to remove your vote. This article can stay featured. I would like to point out that the four supporters above me MUST have a reason for voting. This is directly quote from the rules: ''Not only opposers, but also supporters need to give reasons for their vote. This is due to the fact that what they are doing basically is opposing the FA status of an article, and this needs to be justified.'' | ||
#{{User| | #{{User|Fredthefish}} | ||
#{{User|Iggykoopa}} i fixed some of the problems as well i think it meets that standards of a featured article | |||
==== Removal of Support/Oppose Votes ==== | ==== Removal of Support/Oppose Votes ==== | ||
==== Comments ==== | ==== Comments ==== | ||
'''Way''' too much work, it's better to just unfeature it. {{User|SWFlash}} | '''Way''' too much work, it's better to just unfeature it. {{User|SWFlash}} | ||
Line 53: | Line 44: | ||
Reversinator: Not every single section needs an image. Why does Super Mario Galaxy 2's section need an image? I looks fine to me. There are no spots in the article where there is a big wall of text. {{User|LeftyGreenMario}} | Reversinator: Not every single section needs an image. Why does Super Mario Galaxy 2's section need an image? I looks fine to me. There are no spots in the article where there is a big wall of text. {{User|LeftyGreenMario}} | ||