Editing MarioWiki:Featured articles/Unfeature/N1/Equipment

__NOTOC__
===[[Equipment]]===
{{UNFANOMFAIL
|nominated=02:40, October 22, 2024 (EDT)
|lastedit=06:40, 21 December 2024
|nosupport=false
}}

==== Remove featured article status ====
#{{User|RickTommy}} 1) Unlike most other ''Smash''-related articles, it still includes non-''Mario''-related stuff. 2) ''SSB4'' hasn't been at the front of peoples' minds since ''Ultimate'' was released (and is &mdash; I'm not making this up &mdash; possibly the game to which this most applies).

==== Keep featured article status ====
#{{User|Sparks}} Per my comment below. I also want to say that it doesn't matter if a game is forgotten or bad; it's about the quality of the article itself.
#{{User|Tails777}} Per Sparks.Crossover content or game relevancy should not impact if an article can, can't, should or shouldn't be featured. If the article itself is still a good quality article, it can stay featured.
#{{User|Power Flotzo}} Per all.
#{{User|Hewer}} The article's quality is what determines whether it should get featured. The arguments for unfeaturing have nothing to do with the article's quality.
#{{User|Killer Moth}} Per all.

==== Removal of support/oppose votes ====

==== Comments ====
I'm not going to vote at the moment, but I don't think the article should be unfeatured just because of having too much non-Mario coverage. Glancing at the article, I think it looks neat and detailed. {{User:Sparks/sig}}|
Latest revision		Your text
Line 20:		Line 20:

	==== Comments ====		==== Comments ====
	I'm not going to vote at the moment, but I don't think the article should be unfeatured just because of having too much non-Mario coverage. Glancing at the article, I think it looks neat and detailed. {{User:Sparks/sig}}		I'm not going to vote at the moment, but I don't think the article should be unfeatured just because of having too much non-Mario coverage. Glancing at the article, I think it looks neat and detailed. {{User:Sparks/sig}}\|