Editing MarioWiki:Featured articles/Unfeature/N1/Donkey Kong Land

From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.

Latest revision Your text
Line 1: Line 1:
__NOTOC__
__NOTOC__
===[[{{#titleparts:{{PAGENAME}}||4}}]]===
===[[{{#titleparts:{{PAGENAME}}||4}}]]===
{{FA archive notice|unfeature=yes}}
{{UNFANOMSTAT
'''Donkey Kong Land''' was nominated to be unfeatured at 03:08, 15 August 2014 and passed at 22:08, 21 August 2014.
|nominated= 15:00, 30 July 2014
|passed=<!--When it is 5-0, put the time (such as 12:10, 11 December 2009) of the fifth support/removal of last opposet  by copying it from the history of the page.-->
}}
==== Remove Featured Article Status ====
==== Remove Featured Article Status ====
#{{User|Randombob-omb4761}} This article needs more images (Just look at the template on the article!), it has 6 missing images.
#{{User|Randombob-omb4761}} This article needs more images (Just look at the template on the article!), it has 6 missing images.
Line 8: Line 10:
#{{User|Ninelevendo}} The 6 images aren't my problem, this article just looks small. The tables aren't that useful and, if anything, make the article worse. There isn't a controls section and the rest of the article could be better. The article does need more images as well, not just 6.
#{{User|Ninelevendo}} The 6 images aren't my problem, this article just looks small. The tables aren't that useful and, if anything, make the article worse. There isn't a controls section and the rest of the article could be better. The article does need more images as well, not just 6.
#{{User|Vommack}} I thought it was good enough at first, but looking further at the flaws that have been brought up, I've changed my mind. Per BL and Ninelevendo.
#{{User|Vommack}} I thought it was good enough at first, but looking further at the flaws that have been brought up, I've changed my mind. Per BL and Ninelevendo.
#{{User|Tsunami}} OK, when I first opposed, I didn't read the article well. Now, I see that most of the article are '''tables'''. It's a bit like [[List of shops in Super Mario RPG: Legend of the Seven Stars]], only that it was 100% tables. Those images missing make the article seem really incomplete. When a reader reads this "Featured" Article and sees only a part of the images... well, I would instead watch some videos. Oh, but hold on a second... there wasn't a rule? Yep, a rule that prevents Lakitu to be featured for a long time. Yes, that rule 5: '''''An article must not be tagged with any sort of improvement tag'''''. There is a image requested templat at '''top''' of the article. Technically, I'm switching sides like Vommack did. @Super Radio: Yes, the enemies sections are writed good, only that some images are missing. And the article totally lacks colors...
#{{User|3D Player 2004}} per Ninelevendo


==== Keep Featured Article Status ====
==== Keep Featured Article Status ====
#{{user|Tsunami}} Unfeaturing just because there are a few images missing? I know that missing images is an issue on an article, especially on one featured, but still you need to know that editing an image to get the ACTUAL sprite is difficult, especially in a black and white game. The issue can be easily resolved by putting images of the full screen to represent the subject. Done. Also, the oppose you did for [[Lakitu]], that says that it has a rewrite template, well, it isn't totally right to be an oppose in my opinion. One should check a page often when it is about to be Featured. I know that rule 5 says that no templates should be in the article, but in this article the template can be taken down like I said before. But rule 10 says that the images should be of good quality '''if avaible'''. You know, sprites are sprites, and they have to be like they are in the game, without missing any pixel. And those sprites are difficult to get. Still, remember that you can easily '''put images of the game screen  to replace sprites that are waiting to be made.''' And I find that, since this is your only issue found, and I think that the article is well written and stuff, your Unfeaturing propose is (no offense) a bit non-costructive. '''A Featured Article should have more issues to be Unfearured.''' Still, this is my point of view. Not all I said can be right and maybe my oppose can fall if you find another GOOD reason for why Unfeaturing this.
#{{user|Super Radio}} People were complaining about unwritten enemy sections. Here's your written sections. This article shall remain featured till the end of all. Capisci?


==== Removal of Support/Oppose Votes ====
==== Removal of Support/Oppose Votes ====
'''Tsunami and Super Radio'''
#{{User|Randombob-omb4761}} I actually HAVE more reasons why this should be unfeatured other than the lack of images, some of the sections are too short. And there isn't even a controls section how do you call that good? Also, Super Radio's oppose is silly.


==== Comments ====
==== Comments ====
Line 27: Line 31:
:I look at it and just get hit with grey and black. There just aren't enough images in general anyway. (If the game boy didn't display colour, Pokemon would seem different.) hpgame is either a game on a HP, a hype game or a really bad typo. - {{User:Ninelevendo/sig}} 04:59, 11 August 2014 (EDT)
:I look at it and just get hit with grey and black. There just aren't enough images in general anyway. (If the game boy didn't display colour, Pokemon would seem different.) hpgame is either a game on a HP, a hype game or a really bad typo. - {{User:Ninelevendo/sig}} 04:59, 11 August 2014 (EDT)
::BTW, it's mainly the Level section I hate. The others still aren't the best, but are pretty good. - {{User:Ninelevendo/sig}} 05:01, 11 August 2014 (EDT)
::BTW, it's mainly the Level section I hate. The others still aren't the best, but are pretty good. - {{User:Ninelevendo/sig}} 05:01, 11 August 2014 (EDT)
@Randombob-omb4761 @Vommack I switched sides after re-reading the article. Now please delete my name from that, otherwise you will delete a supporter. {{User:Tsunami/sig}}

Please note that all contributions to the Super Mario Wiki are considered to be released under the Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported license (see MarioWiki:Copyrights for details). If you don't want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then don't submit it here. You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource. Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!

Cancel Editing help (opens in new window)