Editing MarioWiki:Featured articles/Unfeature/N1/Donkey Kong Land
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
__NOTOC__ | __NOTOC__ | ||
===[[{{#titleparts:{{PAGENAME}}||4}}]]=== | ===[[{{#titleparts:{{PAGENAME}}||4}}]]=== | ||
{{ | {{UNFANOMSTAT | ||
|nominated= 15:00, 30 July 2014 | |||
|passed=<!--When it is 5-0, put the time (such as 12:10, 11 December 2009) of the fifth support/removal of last opposet by copying it from the history of the page.--> | |||
}} | |||
==== Remove Featured Article Status ==== | ==== Remove Featured Article Status ==== | ||
#{{User|Randombob-omb4761}} This article needs more images (Just look at the template on the article!), it has 6 missing images. | #{{User|Randombob-omb4761}} This article needs more images (Just look at the template on the article!), it has 6 missing images. | ||
Line 8: | Line 10: | ||
#{{User|Ninelevendo}} The 6 images aren't my problem, this article just looks small. The tables aren't that useful and, if anything, make the article worse. There isn't a controls section and the rest of the article could be better. The article does need more images as well, not just 6. | #{{User|Ninelevendo}} The 6 images aren't my problem, this article just looks small. The tables aren't that useful and, if anything, make the article worse. There isn't a controls section and the rest of the article could be better. The article does need more images as well, not just 6. | ||
#{{User|Vommack}} I thought it was good enough at first, but looking further at the flaws that have been brought up, I've changed my mind. Per BL and Ninelevendo. | #{{User|Vommack}} I thought it was good enough at first, but looking further at the flaws that have been brought up, I've changed my mind. Per BL and Ninelevendo. | ||
==== Keep Featured Article Status ==== | ==== Keep Featured Article Status ==== | ||
#{{user|Tsunami}} Unfeaturing just because there are a few images missing? I know that missing images is an issue on an article, especially on one featured, but still you need to know that editing an image to get the ACTUAL sprite is difficult, especially in a black and white game. The issue can be easily resolved by putting images of the full screen to represent the subject. Done. Also, the oppose you did for [[Lakitu]], that says that it has a rewrite template, well, it isn't totally right to be an oppose in my opinion. One should check a page often when it is about to be Featured. I know that rule 5 says that no templates should be in the article, but in this article the template can be taken down like I said before. But rule 10 says that the images should be of good quality '''if avaible'''. You know, sprites are sprites, and they have to be like they are in the game, without missing any pixel. And those sprites are difficult to get. Still, remember that you can easily '''put images of the game screen to replace sprites that are waiting to be made.''' And I find that, since this is your only issue found, and I think that the article is well written and stuff, your Unfeaturing propose is (no offense) a bit non-costructive. '''A Featured Article should have more issues to be Unfearured.''' Still, this is my point of view. Not all I said can be right and maybe my oppose can fall if you find another GOOD reason for why Unfeaturing this. | |||
#{{user|Super Radio}} People were complaining about unwritten enemy sections. Here's your written sections. This article shall remain featured till the end of all. Capisci? | |||
==== Removal of Support/Oppose Votes ==== | ==== Removal of Support/Oppose Votes ==== | ||
'''Tsunami and Super Radio''' | |||
#{{User|Randombob-omb4761}} I actually HAVE more reasons why this should be unfeatured other than the lack of images, some of the sections are too short. And there isn't even a controls section how do you call that good? Also, Super Radio's oppose is silly. | |||
==== Comments ==== | ==== Comments ==== | ||
Line 27: | Line 31: | ||
:I look at it and just get hit with grey and black. There just aren't enough images in general anyway. (If the game boy didn't display colour, Pokemon would seem different.) hpgame is either a game on a HP, a hype game or a really bad typo. - {{User:Ninelevendo/sig}} 04:59, 11 August 2014 (EDT) | :I look at it and just get hit with grey and black. There just aren't enough images in general anyway. (If the game boy didn't display colour, Pokemon would seem different.) hpgame is either a game on a HP, a hype game or a really bad typo. - {{User:Ninelevendo/sig}} 04:59, 11 August 2014 (EDT) | ||
::BTW, it's mainly the Level section I hate. The others still aren't the best, but are pretty good. - {{User:Ninelevendo/sig}} 05:01, 11 August 2014 (EDT) | ::BTW, it's mainly the Level section I hate. The others still aren't the best, but are pretty good. - {{User:Ninelevendo/sig}} 05:01, 11 August 2014 (EDT) | ||