Editing MarioWiki:Featured articles/Unfeature/N1/Dimentio

__NOTOC__
===[[{{SUBPAGENAME}}]]===
{{UNFANOMFAIL
|nominated=22:20, 24 February 2011 (EST)
|lastedit=22:20, May 24th, 2011
|nosupport=true
}}

==== Remove Featured Article Status ====
#{{User|LeftyGreenMario}} If the tense template is up for a while and no one has made any changes, then why are we hesitating to unfeature it? Besides, the article seems to be long on the text and a little bit short on the images. There are grammar errors and informal style here and there, but my main concern is the tense template and how the article is written.
#{{user|SWFlash}} Some of the images are in bad quality.
#{{User|Doopliss42}} Per all. I think this article sucks!
#{{User|Superfiremario}} Per Doopliss42.
#{{User|Nicke8}} Per SWFlash.
#{{User|Pie4ever0}} Dimentio isn't a big enough character in the Mario Series. Why should he be a Featured Article when he's only been in SPM, while characters like Yoshi, who have made appearances in countless Mario games, are going unfeatured? (Also Per Doopliss42)
#{{User|BoygeyDude}}I Hate Dimentio. >:( Per all.

==== Keep Featured Article Status ====
#{{User|SolarBlaze}}: As I said earlier, I went ahead and corrected the article's errors, so I'm going to go ahead and place my vote on keeping its Featured Article status.
#{{User|New Super Mario}}: This article has good quality. It's a pretty decent size, has good grammar, and images. 
#{{User|Yoshidude99}}: Per New Super Mario.
#{{User|MrConcreteDonkey}}: Per all.
#{{User|Iggykoopa}} per all also this article doesn't suck its good and has enough info
#{{User|Mario4Ever}} I fixed the tense issue yesterday. Overall, the article is well-written, informative, and pleasing to the eye. It's definitely one of the best this wiki has to offer.
#{{User|SuperYoshiBros}} Personally, I think this is a very good article. It has images, and it also is very long, so I think we should keep it as a Featured Articles.
#{{User|Catboy41}} As much as I hate Dimentio, the article does indeed meet the requirements. I think it should still be featured.
#{{User|Kooperfan21}}:This article is descriptive, an appropriate size, and has good pictures, not to mention its one of the most important articles due to Dimentio being a major and sybolic villain. Overall it should stay.
#{{User|UltraMario3000}} Per all.
#{{User|Mario7727}}
#{{User|Mr. 1-UP}} This is a very impressively written article with great picture's and great writting, overall it should stay.
#{{User|Tails777}} per all

==== Removal of Support/Oppose Votes ====

==== Comments ====
In my opinion, you can always change the tense yourself quite easily (though it is quite a pain). I understand changing the informal parts are a pain, though. Images should be the main concern, though. I don't have the game to do this, though. {{User|BabyLuigiOnFire}}

<s>I'll see what I can do about fixing this article's problems.
{{User|SolarBlaze}}</s>

The template is still there :/ And did you read my other reasons? {{User|LeftyGreenMario}}

The present/past-tense errors have been corrected.
{{User|SolarBlaze}}

:Really? I still see some past tense verbs. {{User|LeftyGreenMario}}

BLOF, By "good quality" I mean that I beleive that it seems lenghty enough and seems interesting to read. {{User|New Super Mario}}
:But is the quality of the writing good? I am forced to support unfeaturing this if the article is filled with bad grammar. {{User|BabyLuigiOnFire}}

@BLOF: I'll go and look for grammar mistakes I missed and fix them. {{User|New Super Mario}}


I hardly found anything with grammar. And I gave some reason to my vote. {{User|New Super Mario}}
:@SKMarioMan: Could you pinpoint an area where information is sparse for us? That way, we know what to fix. {{User|Marioguy1}}
I know that the featuring/unfeaturing process can drag on for a while, but by what margin does either side have to lead vote-wise before the article's fate is decided? {{User|Mario4Ever}}

:By a ratio of 1:5 and the proposal drags for 4 months. {{User|LeftyGreenMario}}