Editing MarioWiki:Featured articles/Unfeature/N1/Dimentio

__NOTOC__
===[[{{SUBPAGENAME}}]]===
{{UNFANOMSTAT
|nominated=22:20, 24 February 2011 (EST)
|passed=<!--When it is 5-0, put the time (such as 12:10, 11 December 2009) of the fifth support/removal of last opposet  by copying it from the history of the page.-->
}}
==== Remove Featured Article Status ====
#{{User|LeftyGreenMario}} If the tense template is up for a while and no one has made any changes, then why are we hesitating to unfeature it? Besides, the article seems to be long on the text and a little bit short on the images. There are grammar errors and informal style here and there, but my main concern is the tense template and how the article is written.
#{{User|Pokémon Trainer Mario}} It is kind of short :/
#{{user|SWFlash}} Some of the images are in bad quality.
#{{User|SKmarioman}} There isn't enough information, and other featured articles have been at least twice as long as this one.
#{{Doopliss42}} Per all. I think this article sucks!
==== Keep Featured Article Status ====
#{{User|SolarBlaze}}: As I said earlier, I went ahead and corrected the article's errors, so I'm going to go ahead and place my vote on keeping its Featured Article status.
#{{User|New Super Mario}}: This article has good quality. It's a pretty decent size, has good grammar, and images. 
#{{User|Kaptain K. Rool}}: Per [[User:New Super Mario|New Super Mario]] and [[User:SolarBlaze|SolarBlaze]].
#{{User|Yoshidude99}}: Per New Super Mario.
#{{User|MrConcreteDonkey}}: Per all.

==== Removal of Support/Oppose Votes ====
'''Pokemon Trainer Mario'''
#{{User|BabyLuigiOnFire}} Again, vague vote. And this article is not short in my opinion, it's huge.
#{{User|Fawfulfury65}} It's long enough for featured article standards. What more can be said about him? He appeared in only one game.
#{{User|LeftyGreenMario}} You have to be more specific.
#{{User|New Super Mario}} Per all

'''SKmarioman'''
#{{User|MrConcreteDonkey}}: There is a lot of detailed information and it includes everything it needs to. It doesn't need to be really long, it just needs to include everything it needs to.

==== Comments ====
In my opinion, you can always change the tense yourself quite easily (though it is quite a pain). I understand changing the informal parts are a pain, though. Images should be the main concern, though. I don't have the game to do this, though. {{User|BabyLuigiOnFire}}

<s>I'll see what I can do about fixing this article's problems.
{{User|SolarBlaze}}</s>

The template is still there :/ And did you read my other reasons? {{User|LeftyGreenMario}}

The present/past-tense errors have been corrected.
{{User|SolarBlaze}}

:Really? I still see some past tense verbs. {{User|LeftyGreenMario}}

BLOF, By "good quality" I mean that I beleive that it seems lenghty enough and seems interesting to read. {{User|New Super Mario}}
:But is the quality of the writing good? I am forced to support unfeaturing this if the article is filled with bad grammar. {{User|BabyLuigiOnFire}}

@BLOF: I'll go and look for grammar mistakes I missed and fix them. {{User|New Super Mario}}


I hardly found anything with grammar. And I gave some reason to my vote. {{User|New Super Mario}}