| Latest revision |
Your text |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| __NOTOC__ | | __NOTOC__ |
| ===[[{{SUBPAGENAME}}]]=== | | ===[[{{SUBPAGENAME}}]]=== |
| {{UNFANOMFAIL | | {{UNFANOMSTAT |
| |nominated=22:20, 24 February 2011 (EST) | | |nominated=22:20, 24 February 2011 (EST) |
| |lastedit=22:20, May 24th, 2011 | | |passed=<!--When it is 5-0, put the time (such as 12:10, 11 December 2009) of the fifth support/removal of last opposet by copying it from the history of the page.--> |
| |nosupport=true
| |
| }} | | }} |
|
| |
| ==== Remove Featured Article Status ==== | | ==== Remove Featured Article Status ==== |
| #{{User|LeftyGreenMario}} Everything seems to be fixed, but the very last section needs images very badly. | | #{{User|LeftyGreenMario}} If the tense template is up for a while and no one has made any changes, then why are we hesitating to unfeature it? Besides, the article seems to be long on the text and a little bit short on the images. There are grammar errors and informal style here and there, but my main concern is the tense template and how the article is written. |
| | #{{User|Pokémon Trainer Mario}} It is kind of short :/ |
| #{{user|SWFlash}} Some of the images are in bad quality. | | #{{user|SWFlash}} Some of the images are in bad quality. |
| #{{User|Doopliss42}} Per all. I think this article sucks!
| |
| #{{User|Superfiremario}} Per Doopliss42.
| |
| #{{User|Nicke8}} Per SWFlash.
| |
| #{{User|Pie4ever0}} Dimentio isn't a big enough character in the Mario Series. Why should he be a Featured Article when he's only been in SPM, while characters like Yoshi, who have made appearances in countless Mario games, are going unfeatured? (Also Per Doopliss42)
| |
| #{{User|BoygeyDude}}I Hate Dimentio. >:( Per all.
| |
|
| |
|
| ==== Keep Featured Article Status ==== | | ==== Keep Featured Article Status ==== |
| #{{User|SolarBlaze}}: As I said earlier, I went ahead and corrected the article's errors, so I'm going to go ahead and place my vote on keeping its Featured Article status. | | #{{User|SolarBlaze}}: As I said earlier, I went ahead and corrected the article's errors, so I'm going to go ahead and place my vote on keeping its Featured Article status. |
| #{{User|New Super Mario}}: This article has good quality. It's a pretty decent size, has good grammar, and images. | | #{{User|New Super Mario}}: This article has good quality. |
| #{{User|Yoshidude99}}: Per New Super Mario. | | #{{User|Kaptain K. Rool}}: Per [[User:New Super Mario|New Super Mario]] and [[User:SolarBlaze|SolarBlaze]]. |
| #{{User|MrConcreteDonkey}}: Per all.
| |
| #{{User|Iggykoopa}} per all also this article doesn't suck its good and has enough info
| |
| #{{User|Mario4Ever}} I fixed the tense issue yesterday. Overall, the article is well-written, informative, and pleasing to the eye. It's definitely one of the best this wiki has to offer.
| |
| #{{User|SuperYoshiBros}} Personally, I think this is a very good article. It has images, and it also is very long, so I think we should keep it as a Featured Articles.
| |
| #{{User|Catboy41}} As much as I hate Dimentio, the article does indeed meet the requirements. I think it should still be featured.
| |
| #{{User|Kooperfan21}}:This article is descriptive, an appropriate size, and has good pictures, not to mention its one of the most important articles due to Dimentio being a major and sybolic villain. Overall it should stay.
| |
| #{{User|UltraMario3000}} Per all.
| |
| #{{User|Mario7727}}
| |
| #{{User|Mr. 1-UP}} This is a very impressively written article with great picture's and great writting, overall it should stay.
| |
| #{{User|Tails777}} per all
| |
|
| |
|
| ==== Removal of Support/Oppose Votes ==== | | ==== Removal of Support/Oppose Votes ==== |
| Line 43: |
Line 27: |
| The present/past-tense errors have been corrected. | | The present/past-tense errors have been corrected. |
| {{User|SolarBlaze}} | | {{User|SolarBlaze}} |
|
| |
| :Really? I still see some past tense verbs. {{User|LeftyGreenMario}}
| |
|
| |
| BLOF, By "good quality" I mean that I beleive that it seems lenghty enough and seems interesting to read. {{User|New Super Mario}}
| |
| :But is the quality of the writing good? I am forced to support unfeaturing this if the article is filled with bad grammar. {{User|BabyLuigiOnFire}}
| |
|
| |
| @BLOF: I'll go and look for grammar mistakes I missed and fix them. {{User|New Super Mario}}
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| I hardly found anything with grammar. And I gave some reason to my vote. {{User|New Super Mario}}
| |
| :@SKMarioMan: Could you pinpoint an area where information is sparse for us? That way, we know what to fix. {{User|Marioguy1}}
| |
| I know that the featuring/unfeaturing process can drag on for a while, but by what margin does either side have to lead vote-wise before the article's fate is decided? {{User|Mario4Ever}}
| |
|
| |
| :By a ratio of 1:5 and the proposal drags for 4 months. {{User|LeftyGreenMario}}
| |
