Editing MarioWiki:Featured articles/Unfeature/N1/Culex

__NOTOC__
===[[{{#titleparts:{{PAGENAME}}||4}}]]===
{{UNFANOMSTAT
|nominated= April 2, 2014 17:30 GMT
|passed=<!--When it is 5-0, put the time (such as 12:10, 11 December 2009) of the fifth support/removal of last opposet  by copying it from the history of the page.-->
}}
==== Remove Featured Article Status ====
#{{User|Randombob-omb4761}} I don't understand why this is a featured article, it's too short. Were the 2011 users crazy?

==== Keep Featured Article Status ====
#<s>{{User|bluetoad63}} its supposed to be short, because he's only been in one game. It does follow the rule about having enough bytes.</s>

==== Removal of Support/Oppose Votes ====
'''Bluetoad63'''
#{{User|Yoshi876}} Whilst I do disagree with the shortness point, it should probably be shorter considering it was only in one game (where it was optional). And if we're using your logic of "It's meant to be short due to it being in one game" then I can nominate [[Cranky's Lab|this]] for featured status. We removed the guideline you're citing as articles shorter theoretically could suffice for feature status.
#{{User|Randombob-omb4761}} That's not a very good oppose vote Bluetoad63, Baby Donkey Kong is short and he appeared in more than 1 game, Per Yoshi876.

==== Comments ====
No it's not, it's 3000 bytes more. {{User|Yoshi876}}

I just got rid of it, on my own. {{User:Bluetoad63/sig}} 13:41, 2 April 2014 (EDT)
@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 __NOTOC__
-===[[{{SUBPAGENAME}}]]===
+===[[{{#titleparts:{{PAGENAME}}||4}}]]===
-{{UNFANOMFAIL
+{{UNFANOMSTAT
-|nominated=April 2, 2014 17:30 GMT
+|nominated= April 2, 2014 17:30 GMT
-|lastedit=May 2, 17:30, 2014
+|passed=<!--When it is 5-0, put the time (such as 12:10, 11 December 2009) of the fifth support/removal of last opposet  by copying it from the history of the page.-->
 }}
 ==== Remove Featured Article Status ====
-#{{User|Randombob-omb4761}} I don't understand why this is a featured article, it's too short, and the final fantasty stuff is spectulation. Were the 2011 users crazy?
+#{{User|Randombob-omb4761}} I don't understand why this is a featured article, it's too short. Were the 2011 users crazy?
-#{{User|Ashley and Red}} This article doesn't seems to be good. The "alusions to FF series" has speculation (He isn't an Black Mage, Dark Knights REALLY exists in Final Fantasy).
-#{{User|smarty54242}} This article isn't even written that well.
 ==== Keep Featured Article Status ====
-#{{User|Tails777}} Length doesn't always matter. We have [[Macho Grubba|shorter]] [[Koopa Bros.|articles]] [[Kolorado|than]] this one. Plus the quality of the article also counts and I don't see anything wrong with it.
+#<s>{{User|bluetoad63}} its supposed to be short, because he's only been in one game. It does follow the rule about having enough bytes.</s>
-#{{User|bluetoad63}} Per Tails.
 ==== Removal of Support/Oppose Votes ====
+'''Bluetoad63'''
+#{{User|Yoshi876}} Whilst I do disagree with the shortness point, it should probably be shorter considering it was only in one game (where it was optional). And if we're using your logic of "It's meant to be short due to it being in one game" then I can nominate [[Cranky's Lab|this]] for featured status. We removed the guideline you're citing as articles shorter theoretically could suffice for feature status.
+#{{User|Randombob-omb4761}} That's not a very good oppose vote Bluetoad63, Baby Donkey Kong is short and he appeared in more than 1 game, Per Yoshi876.
 ==== Comments ====
@@ Line 19: / Line 20: @@
 I just got rid of it, on my own. {{User:Bluetoad63/sig}} 13:41, 2 April 2014 (EDT)
-Bytes =/= article length. Changing the color of the text, for instance, adds bytes without actually increasing article content. So be careful when judging articles by byte size. {{User:Mario/sig}} 14:31, 2 April 2014 (EDT)
-The Final Fantasy stuff may be speculation, but unlike most "theories", this one is well-substantiated, and so, it can stay. {{User:Mario/sig}} 18:33, 3 April 2014 (EDT)
-::Ok, then {{User:Ashley and Red/sig}}
-::While the "theory" may be well-substantiated, it doesn't seem quite right for a good chunk of what is supposed to be an exemplar article to be what amounts to a glorified Trivia section. [[User:Vommack|Vommack]] ([[User talk:Vommack|talk]]) 18:39, 3 April 2014 (EDT)
-:::Well, we can't simply remove the information because this stuff important and can explain why Culex seems so unfitting for a Mario character. This is a rare case where we need to explain. {{User:Mario/sig}} 19:12, 3 April 2014 (EDT)
-:::Mario has a point, it's not likely to be a coincidence this kind of character appears in a Square Enix game. It could be trimmed, possibly. {{User:Lord Grammaticus/sig}} 00:26, 4 April 2014 (EDT)
-We have Macho Grubba, Koopa Bros. and Kolarado. These are featured and shorter than culex. [[User:Waluigi men are as weoseme|Waluigi men are as weoseme]] ([[User talk:Waluigi men are as weoseme|talk]]) 08:26, 3 May 2014 (EDT)