| Latest revision |
Your text |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| __NOTOC__ | | __NOTOC__ |
| ===[[{{SUBPAGENAME}}]]=== | | ===[[{{#titleparts:{{PAGENAME}}||4}}]]=== |
| {{UNFANOMFAIL | | {{UNFANOMSTAT |
| |nominated=April 2, 2014 17:30 GMT | | |nominated= April 2, 2014 17:30 GMT |
| |lastedit=May 2, 17:30, 2014 | | |passed=<!--When it is 5-0, put the time (such as 12:10, 11 December 2009) of the fifth support/removal of last opposet by copying it from the history of the page.--> |
| }} | | }} |
| ==== Remove Featured Article Status ==== | | ==== Remove Featured Article Status ==== |
| #{{User|Randombob-omb4761}} I don't understand why this is a featured article, it's too short, and the final fantasty stuff is spectulation. Were the 2011 users crazy? | | #{{User|Randombob-omb4761}} I don't understand why this is a featured article, it's too short, it's shorter than the Baby Donkey Kong page. |
| #{{User|Ashley and Red}} This article doesn't seems to be good. The "alusions to FF series" has speculation (He isn't an Black Mage, Dark Knights REALLY exists in Final Fantasy).
| | |
| #{{User|smarty54242}} This article isn't even written that well.
| |
| ==== Keep Featured Article Status ==== | | ==== Keep Featured Article Status ==== |
| #{{User|Tails777}} Length doesn't always matter. We have [[Macho Grubba|shorter]] [[Koopa Bros.|articles]] [[Kolorado|than]] this one. Plus the quality of the article also counts and I don't see anything wrong with it.
| |
| #{{User|bluetoad63}} Per Tails.
| |
|
| |
|
| ==== Removal of Support/Oppose Votes ==== | | ==== Removal of Support/Oppose Votes ==== |
| Line 17: |
Line 14: |
| ==== Comments ==== | | ==== Comments ==== |
| No it's not, it's 3000 bytes more. {{User|Yoshi876}} | | No it's not, it's 3000 bytes more. {{User|Yoshi876}} |
|
| |
| I just got rid of it, on my own. {{User:Bluetoad63/sig}} 13:41, 2 April 2014 (EDT)
| |
|
| |
| Bytes =/= article length. Changing the color of the text, for instance, adds bytes without actually increasing article content. So be careful when judging articles by byte size. {{User:Mario/sig}} 14:31, 2 April 2014 (EDT)
| |
|
| |
| The Final Fantasy stuff may be speculation, but unlike most "theories", this one is well-substantiated, and so, it can stay. {{User:Mario/sig}} 18:33, 3 April 2014 (EDT)
| |
| ::Ok, then {{User:Ashley and Red/sig}}
| |
| ::While the "theory" may be well-substantiated, it doesn't seem quite right for a good chunk of what is supposed to be an exemplar article to be what amounts to a glorified Trivia section. [[User:Vommack|Vommack]] ([[User talk:Vommack|talk]]) 18:39, 3 April 2014 (EDT)
| |
| :::Well, we can't simply remove the information because this stuff important and can explain why Culex seems so unfitting for a Mario character. This is a rare case where we need to explain. {{User:Mario/sig}} 19:12, 3 April 2014 (EDT)
| |
| :::Mario has a point, it's not likely to be a coincidence this kind of character appears in a Square Enix game. It could be trimmed, possibly. {{User:Lord Grammaticus/sig}} 00:26, 4 April 2014 (EDT)
| |
|
| |
| We have Macho Grubba, Koopa Bros. and Kolarado. These are featured and shorter than culex. [[User:Waluigi men are as weoseme|Waluigi men are as weoseme]] ([[User talk:Waluigi men are as weoseme|talk]]) 08:26, 3 May 2014 (EDT)
| |
