Editing MarioWiki:Featured articles/Unfeature/N1/Beldam

From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.

Latest revision Your text
Line 1: Line 1:
__NOTOC__
__NOTOC__
===[[{{SUBPAGENAME}}]]===
===[[{{SUBPAGENAME}}]]===
{{UNFANOMFAIL|nominated=00:00, 13 May 2010 (GMT)|lastedit=2010-08-23 14:41:59}}
{{UNFANOMSTAT
 
|nominated=00:00, 13 May 2010 (GMT)
|passed=<!--When it is 5-0, put the time (such as 12:10, 11 December 2009) of the fifth support/removal of last opposet  by copying it from the history of the page.-->
}}
==== Remove Featured Article Status ====
==== Remove Featured Article Status ====
#{{User|Raphaelraven497}} THough it looks as if it is long, it IS in need of minor expansion. Some grammar errors. A few pictures, in JAPANESE?!?!? This ia an ENGLISH wiki. Just not good enough.
#{{User|Fawfulfury65}} It doesn't quite matter if some of the pictures are in Japanese, but almost all of the images are horribly low quality. I also found some areas that were in present tense, and others that were in past tense. They should all be in either past or present, not both.
#{{User|Fawfulfury65}} It doesn't quite matter if some of the pictures are in Japanese, but almost all of the images are horribly low quality. I also found some areas that were in present tense, and others that were in past tense. They should all be in either past or present, not both.
#{{User|Booderdash}} It is WAY too long; some of the sections, they can definitly be indented, plus many of the information is overly redundant (such as Beldam mistreating Vivian which is said over and over again), the redemption section is much too short compared to the other sections, and I think the Moves section of her template needs to split the first battle and the second.
#{{user|KS3}} Per all.
#{{User|Marioguy1}} - I added a {{fake link|tense}} tag to the article in the TTYD section, if that tag is removed (validly), remove my vote along with it.


==== Keep Featured Article Status ====
==== Keep Featured Article Status ====
#{{user|SolarBlaze}} I see nothing wrong with this article, that it needs to be unfeatured. As Fawfulfury65 said already, it covers all of Beldam stats, appearances, and pretty much anything else about her. As for the images, they could easily be replaced with higher quality pictures. I don't think the article should be unfeatured for that reason alone. Also, what grammar errors are we talking about, here?
#{{user|SolarBlaze}} I see nothing wrong with this article, that it needs to be unfeatured. As Fawfulfury65 said already, it covers all of Beldam stats, appearances, and pretty much anything else about her. As for the images, they could easily be replaced with higher quality pictures. I don't think the article should be unfeatured for that reason alone. Also, what grammar errors are we talking about, here?
#{{User|Gamefreak75}} I see nothing wrong with it. It cannot be expanded and it has lotsa images. SolarBlaze uploaded plenty of high-quality pictures. Keep the FA status.
#{{User|Gamefreak75}} I see nothing wrong with it. It cannot be expanded and it has lotsa images. SolarBlaze uploaded plenty of high-quality pictures. Keep the FA status.
#{{User|Commander Code-8}} Per Gamefreak75.
#{{User|Mario is awesome!!!}} There is nothing wrong with this article, so why should it become unfeatured?
#{{User|Chickasaurus}} Per SolarBlaze.
#{{User|Kirbythestar}} The grammar errors mentioned I could not find (perhaps they were removed) and the low-quality images have presumably been fixed by SolarBlaze. Don't unfeature this article.
#{{User|Fuzzipede27}} Per SolarBlaze


==== Removal of Support/Oppose Votes ====
==== Removal of Support/Oppose Votes ====
'''SolarBlaze'''
'''SolarBlaze'''
#{{User|Time Q}}: Saying that the low-quality pictures "could easily be replaced" is not a valid reason. Before this isn't actually done, the article is not FA-worthy. No one knows ''if'' the pictures will actually be replaced.
#{{User|Time Q}}: Saying that the low-quality pictures "could easily be replaced" is not a valid reason. Before this isn't actually done, the article is not FA-worthy. No one knows ''if'' the pictures will actually be replaced.
#{{User|Booderdash}} Per Time Q
#{{user|KS3}} They were replaced, but they still are low quality, with some logos too.


==== Comments ====
==== Comments ====
Line 34: Line 31:
Uh... in the trivia section there's this random stat table for Beldam. It seems misplaced. Where is it supposed to go? {{User|Fawfulfury65}}
Uh... in the trivia section there's this random stat table for Beldam. It seems misplaced. Where is it supposed to go? {{User|Fawfulfury65}}


At the time I was expanding this article about a year ago, I tried to put that alongside the "Data and Statistics" section, but somehow, it ended up around the triva section. I'm not quite sure how to fix that, and I've been at a lost as to what to do with it for a while. Should I just replace the other table at the top of the article with that one? {{User|SolarBlaze}}
At the time I was expanding this article about a year ago, I tried to put that alongside the "Data and Statistics" section, but somehow, it ended up around the triva section. I'm not quite sure how to fix that, and I've been at a lost as to what to do with it for a while. Should I just replace the other table at the top of the article with that one?


As for another minor update, I've corrected the "past/present-tense" grammar errors, as well as replacing the two images that originally had IGN logos at the bottom. As for the other images, I haven't been able to find any higher quality versions of them yet. However, aside from the image where Beldam's calling Vivian a "useless little fool", you've got to admit that the others are a major improvement over the ones that were originally there. Here are some comparisons:
As for another minor update, I've corrected the "past/present-tense" grammar errors, as well as replacing the two images that originally had IGN logos at the bottom. As for the other images, I haven't been able to find any higher quality versions of them yet. However, aside from the image where Beldam's calling Vivian a "useless little fool", you've got to admit that the others are a major improvement over the ones that were originally there. Here are some comparisons:

Please note that all contributions to the Super Mario Wiki are considered to be released under the Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported license (see MarioWiki:Copyrights for details). If you don't want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then don't submit it here. You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource. Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!

Cancel Editing help (opens in new window)