Editing MarioWiki:Featured articles/Unfeature/N1/Beldam
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
__NOTOC__ | __NOTOC__ | ||
===[[{{SUBPAGENAME}}]]=== | ===[[{{SUBPAGENAME}}]]=== | ||
{{ | {{UNFANOMSTAT | ||
|nominated=20:00, 12 May 2010 (EDT) | |||
|passed=<!--When it is 5-0, put the time (such as 12:10, 11 December 2009) of the fifth support/removal of last opposet by copying it from the history of the page.--> | |||
}} | |||
==== Remove Featured Article Status ==== | ==== Remove Featured Article Status ==== | ||
#{{User|Raphaelraven497}} THough it looks as if it is long, it IS in need of minor expansion. Some grammar errors. A few pictures, in JAPANESE?!?!? This ia an ENGLISH wiki. Just not good enough. | |||
#{{User|Fawfulfury65}} It doesn't quite matter if some of the pictures are in Japanese, but almost all of the images are horribly low quality. I also found some areas that were in present tense, and others that were in past tense. They should all be in either past or present, not both. | #{{User|Fawfulfury65}} It doesn't quite matter if some of the pictures are in Japanese, but almost all of the images are horribly low quality. I also found some areas that were in present tense, and others that were in past tense. They should all be in either past or present, not both. | ||
==== Keep Featured Article Status ==== | ==== Keep Featured Article Status ==== | ||
#{{user|SolarBlaze}} I see nothing wrong with this article, that it needs to be unfeatured. As Fawfulfury65 said already, it covers all of Beldam stats, appearances, and pretty much anything else about her. As for the images, they could easily be replaced with higher quality pictures. I don't think the article should be unfeatured for that reason alone. Also, what grammar errors are we talking about, here? | #{{user|SolarBlaze}} I see nothing wrong with this article, that it needs to be unfeatured. As Fawfulfury65 said already, it covers all of Beldam stats, appearances, and pretty much anything else about her. As for the images, they could easily be replaced with higher quality pictures. I don't think the article should be unfeatured for that reason alone. Also, what grammar errors are we talking about, here? | ||
==== Removal of Support/Oppose Votes ==== | ==== Removal of Support/Oppose Votes ==== | ||
'''SolarBlaze''' | '''SolarBlaze''' | ||
#{{User|Time Q}}: Saying that the low-quality pictures "could easily be replaced" is not a valid reason. Before this isn't actually done, the article is not FA-worthy. No one knows ''if'' the pictures will actually be replaced. | #{{User|Time Q}}: Saying that the low-quality pictures "could easily be replaced" is not a valid reason. Before this isn't actually done, the article is not FA-worthy. No one knows ''if'' the pictures will actually be replaced. | ||
==== Comments ==== | ==== Comments ==== | ||
Ummm... One question... How on earth would you expand this?! Other than that, I pretty much agree with you. {{user|Bloc Partier}} | Ummm... One question... How on earth would you expand this?! Other than that, I pretty much agree with you. {{user|Bloc Partier}} | ||
:I don't know how you could expand it either. The article already explains all her stats and appearances. {{User|Fawfulfury65}} | :I don't know how you could expand it either. The article already explains all her stats and appearances. {{User|Fawfulfury65}} | ||