Editing MarioWiki:Featured articles/Unfeature/N/Ruddy Road
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
| Latest revision | Your text | ||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
==== Keep featured article status ==== | ==== Keep featured article status ==== | ||
#{{User|Paper Plumm}} When looking at requirements that define an article to be featured Ruddy Road not only succeeds at passing every requirement to be a featured article it excels at it. Every inch of what is in this level is covered quite thoroughly. The issue that seems to be plaguing those discontent with its status is that it is too similar in structure to other articles that are not at featured status. So, are we to raise our standards of what make a featured article solely because it's from a series of articles that are all of good quality? If say this level of quality was applied to say an area from another Mario game yet all others of it were bad would that be enough to justify it being featured status? An article does not need to shine out from the crowd for it to be considered featurable. In terms of other points, I did not find any red links on there,and I'm not exactly sure what idea inefficient space refers to. But if I am to understand it correctly this idea stems from the large amount of space the colourless spots and ? Blocks section take up on the article. However, as they are collectibles that may be hard to see at smaller sizes a larger image size, I and I assume many others feel is necessary to be properly seen and for it to achieve its purpose, which is after to help visualise where each colourless spot and ? Block can be found in the level. Even if this idea of overuse of space is one that you feel is unwarranted, take an article like [[Nintendo Kids Space]], another of the featured array, which also features a large section of it taken up by a similar image and description section, so I assure you it is an idea that holds precedent. I also do not understand the point of repeated information; nothing is ever really reiterated within the article. If there is anything else you feel is preventing this article from keeping its space, I would more than willingly do so in order to allow that. | #{{User|Paper Plumm}} When looking at requirements that define an article to be featured Ruddy Road not only succeeds at passing every requirement to be a featured article it excels at it. Every inch of what is in this level is covered quite thoroughly. The issue that seems to be plaguing those discontent with its status is that it is too similar in structure to other articles that are not at featured status. So, are we to raise our standards of what make a featured article solely because it's from a series of articles that are all of good quality? If say this level of quality was applied to say an area from another Mario game yet all others of it were bad would that be enough to justify it being featured status? An article does not need to shine out from the crowd for it to be considered featurable. In terms of other points, I did not find any red links on there,and I'm not exactly sure what idea inefficient space refers to. But if I am to understand it correctly this idea stems from the large amount of space the colourless spots and ? Blocks section take up on the article. However, as they are collectibles that may be hard to see at smaller sizes a larger image size, I and I assume many others feel is necessary to be properly seen and for it to achieve its purpose, which is after to help visualise where each colourless spot and ? Block can be found in the level. Even if this idea of overuse of space is one that you feel is unwarranted, take an article like [[Nintendo Kids Space]], another of the featured array, which also features a large section of it taken up by a similar image and description section, so I assure you it is an idea that holds precedent. I also do not understand the point of repeated information; nothing is ever really reiterated within the article. If there is anything else you feel is preventing this article from keeping its space, I would more than willingly do so in order to allow that. | ||
==== Removal of support/oppose votes ==== | ==== Removal of support/oppose votes ==== | ||
==== Comments ==== | ==== Comments ==== | ||
