Editing MarioWiki:Featured articles/N2/Yoshi

It's time. [[Talk:Yoshi]] shows PLUMs's & Knife's reviews of 19.5 and 19, passing the PAIR system. Please provide a solid reason, preferably referring to the article text itself.

<big>'''[[Yoshi]] (2)'''</big>

===Support===
#{{User:Knife/sig}} 17:31, 3 August 2007 (EDT) &ndash; it is well written, why shouldn't it be the first FA again?
#{{User:Lario/sig}} - Above
#{{User:Plumber/Pignature}} Per Knife
#--{{User:Toa Waluigi/sig}} 10:22, 9 August 2007 (EDT) very well written
#--{{User:Mr.Game and Watch/sig}} 19:08, 11 August 2007 (EDT) Well this article is very complete with information and images.
Definetly. A perfect article. [[User:Super Kramio|Super Kramio]] 14:10, 28 August 2007 (EDT)

===Oppose===

===Comments===
Er, according to [[MarioWiki:Featured articles]], this has expired. Shouldn't it get featured now? - {{User:Cobold/sig}} 15:03, 12 August 2007 (EDT)

Injustice! They deleted my vote just before!
--{{User:Mr.Game and Watch/sig}} 20:50, 12 August 2007 (EDT)

If you don't give reason, it WILL be delleted.
[[User:Gofer|Gofer]]

Oh... sorry...
--{{User:Mr.Game and Watch/sig}} 20:56, 12 August 2007 (EDT)

I suppose it should be featured...but there's so little votes, and I feel as if there's no enthusiasm... {{User:Wayoshi/sig}} 20:59, 12 August 2007 (EDT)

Well, maybe featuring it would make people enthusiast about FA again.
[[User:Gofer|Gofer]]
Latest revision		Your text
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~{{FA archive notice}}~~
	It's time. [[Talk:Yoshi]] shows PLUMs's & Knife's reviews of 19.5 and 19, passing the PAIR system. Please provide a solid reason, preferably referring to the article text itself.		It's time. [[Talk:Yoshi]] shows PLUMs's & Knife's reviews of 19.5 and 19, passing the PAIR system. Please provide a solid reason, preferably referring to the article text itself.