You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with
other benefits.
The edit can be undone.
Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
| Latest revision |
Your text |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| __NOTOC__
| | #REDIRECT [[MarioWiki:Featured Articles/Archive/N1/Super Paper Mario]] |
| ===[[{{#titleparts:{{PAGENAME}}||3}}]]===
| |
| {{FANOMFAIL
| |
| |nominated=22:30, 19 June 2013 (EST)
| |
| |lastedit=04:15, 20 June 2013
| |
| |nosupport=true
| |
| }}
| |
| ==== Support ====
| |
| #{{User|Tanookitoad}}
| |
| ==== Oppose ====
| |
| #{{User|Pinkie Pie}} I strongly disagree with you. The Super Paper Mario page isn't ready to be featured, because the rewritten template is still on the page, meaning it need to be rewritten before it can be featured.
| |
| #{{User|Baby Luigi}} The rewrite complaint that unfeatured the article in the first place is still there, so why did you renominate it if the problems aren't fixed?
| |
| #{{User|Mr. Game & Watch}} The article itself is still in poor condition; there's still a lot of flowery writing, I saw some grammar mistakes mixed around the page, and there's still a rewrite template on it.
| |
| #{{User|Time Turner}} Per everything that got this article unfeatured in the first place.
| |
| #{{User|Yoshi876}} Per all, also shouldn't you have a reason for nominating this?
| |
| | |
| ==== Removal of Opposes ====
| |
| | |
| ==== Comments ====
| |
