| Latest revision |
Your text |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| __NOTOC__ | | __NOTOC__ |
| ===[[{{#titleparts:{{PAGENAME}}||3}}]]=== | | ===[[{{#titleparts:{{PAGENAME}}||3}}]]=== |
| {{FA archive notice}} | | {{FANOMSTAT |
| '''Princess Daisy''' became a featured article at 13:24, 17 December 2013.
| | |nominated=13:47 (GMT), 16 November 2013 |
| | |passed=<!--When it is 5-0, put the time (such as 12:10, 11 December 2012) of the fifth support/removal of last oppose by copying it from the history of the page.--> |
| | }} |
| ==== Support ==== | | ==== Support ==== |
| #{{User|Ashley anEoTselkie}} It's a good page,with detailed sections. It's very pretty written.I think that if Baby Daisy is featured,Daisy need to be too. | | #{{User|Ashley anEoTselkie}} It's a good page,with detailed sections. It's very pretty written.I think that if Baby Daisy is featured,Daisy need to be too. |
| Line 8: |
Line 10: |
| #{{User|UhHuhAlrightDaisy}} | | #{{User|UhHuhAlrightDaisy}} |
| #{{User|Cirdec}} | | #{{User|Cirdec}} |
| #{{User|LeftyGreenMario}} | | #{{User|LeftyGreenMario}} |
| #{{User|Gonzales Kart Inc.}}
| |
| #{{User|RandomDSplayer}}
| |
|
| |
|
| ==== Oppose ==== | | ==== Oppose ==== |
| | #{{User|Yoshi876}} Per Tails, and I also don't think any of the problems from the unfeaturing nomination have been fixed. |
| | #{{User|Randombob-omb4761}} Per All. |
|
| |
|
| ==== Removal of Opposes ==== | | ==== Removal of Opposes ==== |
| | '''Yoshi876''' and '''Randombob-omb4761''' |
| | #{{User|Icemario11}} The improvement tag has been dealt with legitimately and all brought up problems with this article have been dealt with. |
| | #{{User|UhHuhAlrightDaisy}} Per above. Further, even though it's now been changed, LeftyGreenMario's comment on the new olympic game as well as a game yet to be released and with little to no information on the game itself let alone Daisy being known yet is utterly ridiculous and holds no merit against the quality of her page as a whole and its worthiness of being featured. |
|
| |
|
| ==== Comments ==== | | ==== Comments ==== |
| Line 32: |
Line 37: |
| :::From what I can tell, Daisy doesn't interact much with either of them, and there wouldn't be too much to say especially in Tatanga's case. {{User|Icemario11}} | | :::From what I can tell, Daisy doesn't interact much with either of them, and there wouldn't be too much to say especially in Tatanga's case. {{User|Icemario11}} |
| ::::Which is why I said "slight". There may be some interactions in non-game media, so that's still open. {{User|LeftyGreenMario}} | | ::::Which is why I said "slight". There may be some interactions in non-game media, so that's still open. {{User|LeftyGreenMario}} |
| :::::Other media was what I ended up using for Tatanga since there's hardly much to go on for him otherwise. Bowser had enough game interaction for me to use that for him, so that's what I ended up doing. {{User|Icemario11}}
| |
|
| |
| @Yoshi876 Where did you find out Daisy appears in Super Mario-Kun? {{User|Icemario11}}
| |
| :He didn't read the article, is the thing. He looked at the old unfeature info and nothing else. That info was removed months ago. Clearly just someone who doesn't want the article featured for anything they think is a reason. [[User:UhHuhAlrightDaisy|UhHuhAlrightDaisy]] ([[User talk:UhHuhAlrightDaisy|talk]]) 23:16, 26 November 2013 (EST)
| |
| ::I have some scans of Super Mario-Kun, and Daisy does appear. I'm not sure exactly which volume, but she's there. {{User|LeftyGreenMario}}
| |
| :::@UhHuhDaisy I'm fine with any article being featured as long as it has all the content, and seeing as Daisy does appear in Super Mario-Kun that needs to have some info, I'm fine with what her role is considering that Super Mario Kun is an obscure thing to get. {{User|Yoshi876}}
| |
| ::::But we don't know that she does. There's no proof of it, that's why the info was removed, so your oppose needs to be removed. [[User:UhHuhAlrightDaisy|UhHuhAlrightDaisy]] ([[User talk:UhHuhAlrightDaisy|talk]]) 15:55, 27 November 2013 (EST)
| |
| :::::Three sections up from this comment says she does appear, so my oppose stays. {{User|Yoshi876}}
| |
| ::::::Someone on here saying she does appear doesn't make it a fact. Are you trolling right now? [[User:UhHuhAlrightDaisy|UhHuhAlrightDaisy]] ([[User talk:UhHuhAlrightDaisy|talk]]) 15:58, 27 November 2013 (EST)
| |
| :::::::No, but someone on here who possesses volumes does make it fact. {{User|Yoshi876}}
| |
| ::::::::I've looked through Super Mario-kun while I didn't look through each comic, I never found her in the many I had. So until they post the proof as opposed to saying they have it it's not a fact which is why your oppose is invalid. [[User:UhHuhAlrightDaisy|UhHuhAlrightDaisy]] ([[User talk:UhHuhAlrightDaisy|talk]]) 16:27, 27 November 2013 (EST)
| |
| :::::::::Well she says she has scans that have her in it, and seeing as Lefty has no reason to lie, especially since she's supporting the nomination I'm heavily inclined to believe her and so my oppose shall stay. {{User|Yoshi876}}
| |
| ::::::::::There's no problem, guys. If we can see the scans that have Daisy in it then there is a valid reason to oppose. If we can't, due to lack of evidence, I'm afraid the opposes will go. Let's give it some time, there's no need to rush a nomination. --{{User|Tucayo}}
| |
| :::::::::::The biggest problem is my sharing device that stores the scans somehow stopped working, so I can't access whatever I had. {{User|LeftyGreenMario}}
| |
| :Can you even name what volumes she appears in so others can investigate? [[User:UhHuhAlrightDaisy|UhHuhAlrightDaisy]] ([[User talk:UhHuhAlrightDaisy|talk]]) 12:00, 1 December 2013 (EST)
| |
| On a separate note, why is her relaitonship section a big bunch? Do other character pages do it like this now? [[User:UhHuhAlrightDaisy|UhHuhAlrightDaisy]] ([[User talk:UhHuhAlrightDaisy|talk]]) 12:48, 1 December 2013 (EST)
| |
| :Yeah, there was a [[MarioWiki:Proposals/Archive/36#Trim the Relationship Sections|proposal]] to condense the relationship sections. {{User|Yoshi876}}
| |
|
| |
| Removal since Lefty is just stalling the nomination. Lefty is stalling these few weeks and will be off the hook since he'll finally have a legit excuse to stall when Christmas week comes.
| |
|
| |
| Can no one see his filibuster here? Obviously, he could give another user a torrent, but refuses to since he loves to stall.
| |
|
| |
| if he has time for gameFAQs [which he has been posting on quite often, recently] then it obviously means he is not making this his online priority and is thus stalling a proposal to make it null and void.
| |
|
| |
| As such, a time limit shall be given to him as VP. The time limit is by next Friday, December 13. If no such evidence is presented, opposals shall accordingly be removed to progress Daisy's nomination.{{unsigned|84.109.160.122}}
| |
| :Since when do you decide what happens? Lefty isn't the only person who can go out and find these things. {{User|Yoshi876}}
| |
| ::I don't know how much ti matters that you're still opposing anyway, doesn't the majority rule in these? Still, like I said I've looked very hard for her appearance in Super Mario Kun and I've never found anything. I've seen her in other MArio comics from Japan, but not Super Mario Kun. No one's providing anything on it so I honestly think people just assume she's in them since logically she should, but I don't think she is. [[User:UhHuhAlrightDaisy|UhHuhAlrightDaisy]] ([[User talk:UhHuhAlrightDaisy|talk]]) 12:04, 7 December 2013 (EST)
| |
| :::Nah, you're thinking about proposals. With nominations, you need at least five supports and no opposes for the article to be legible for featuring, and even then it takes one week for the article to get featured once that requirement is met. {{User|Icemario11}}
| |
