Latest revision |
Your text |
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| __NOTOC__ | | __NOTOC__ |
| ===[[Mario (franchise)]]=== | | ===[[Mario (series)]]=== |
| {{FANOMFAIL | | {{FANOMSTAT |
| |nominated=17:30, 30 March 2011 | | |nominated=17:30, 30 March 2011 |
| |lastedit=21:51, 22 April 2012 | | |passed=<!--When it is 5-0, put the time (such as 12:10, 11 December 2009) of the fifth support/removal of last oppose by copying it from the history of the page.--> |
| |nosupport=false
| |
| }} | | }} |
| ==== Support ==== | | ==== Support ==== |
| #{{User|Jose17796}} I would be excited if the Mario series became a feature article! | | #{{User|DKPetey99}} This is probably the second main page of this wiki! It is the Mario series with everything that contains everything Mario. Forget the construction template, besides that, it is a superb page! |
| #{{User|DKPetey99}} This page has a vast amount of info. I don't see any other missing games. Characters, and species seem okay. | | #{{User|Reddragon19k}} |
| #{{User|DK and Diddy Kong vs Bowser and Bowser Jr.}} | | #{{User|DK and Diddy Kong vs Bowser and Bowser Jr.}} |
| #{{User|Weegee010}} | | #{{User|Weegee010}} |
Line 17: |
Line 16: |
| #{{User|DarthPineapple401}} | | #{{User|DarthPineapple401}} |
| #{{User|Nbradley13}} | | #{{User|Nbradley13}} |
| #{{User|Olors}} | | #{{User|Olors}} |
| #{{User|Pie4ever0}} | | #{{User|Pie4ever0}} |
| #{{User|BoygeyDude}}
| |
| #{{User|SUPERZ}}
| |
| #{{User|Jjrapper100}}
| |
| #{{User|Conanshinichi}}
| |
| #{{User|"Luigi Time!"}}
| |
| #{{User|Technickal}}
| |
| #{{User|Likesorange}}
| |
| #{{User|Helper}}
| |
| #{{User|The Knocker}}
| |
| #{{User|Luigirules33}}
| |
| #<s>{{User|Super Famicom 64}}</s> '''I moved my vote to oppose.'''
| |
| #{{User|SoCool21}}
| |
|
| |
|
| ==== Oppose ==== | | ==== Oppose ==== |
Line 47: |
Line 34: |
| #{{User|Steverocks27}} rewrite template | | #{{User|Steverocks27}} rewrite template |
| #{{User|Mario Bros.!}} The first thing you see is a rewrite template. | | #{{User|Mario Bros.!}} The first thing you see is a rewrite template. |
| #{{User|Supremo78}} Per the Hammer Bro. with extreme fury. | | #{{User|Gloomba}} Some important things are missing. I think this page must be more organized with species (Koopa Troopas and Paratroopas in the "Koopa" species, for example). |
| #{{User|IGGY7735}} How could I not agree with a furious hammer-tossing turtle? :D
| |
| #{{User|GEX}}Per all.
| |
| #{{User|Toad85}} Work on putting all the games in first. Per Fawfulfury65.
| |
| #{{User|Goomblob}} Per all..
| |
| #{{User|KS3}} This looks more like a list of everything instead of an article, and a rewrite template is located at the top of the page.
| |
| #{{User|Roads}} Right up at the top of the page is the template that keeps this page below Featured Article standards.
| |
| #{{User|Commander Code-8}} Currently not up to FA standards but can be with lots of editing.
| |
| #{{User|YoshiKong}} If it has a rewrite-expand template, it shouldn't become a featured article.
| |
| #{{User|M&L}} It has a rrewrite-expand template and is missing lots of information. Maybe with a few people all working hard on it it may be good enough to become a FA, but right now, it needs too much work.
| |
| #[[User:'Shroom64]] How can an article become featured if it has some improvement templates? Rule number 5: '''[[MarioWiki:Featured articles|The article must not be tagged with any sort of improvement tags (i.e. rewrite, sectionstub, etc).]]''' But at the top of the article there is a rewrite template and on the "2010-Present" section there is an under construction template. Per all.
| |
| #{{User|Super Famicom 64}} This article was never rewritten even if there was a request for rewriting template.
| |
|
| |
|
| ==== Removal of Opposes ==== | | ==== Removal of Opposes ==== |
Line 104: |
Line 80: |
|
| |
|
| Species list is done, please no one add to it, it may overflow! {{User|DKPetey99}} 12:12, 28 April 2011 (EDT) | | Species list is done, please no one add to it, it may overflow! {{User|DKPetey99}} 12:12, 28 April 2011 (EDT) |
|
| |
| '''@DKPetey''' We don't forget about construction templates. So many people do this... They nominate an article to be featured, when they forget about construction templates. {{User|Supremo78}}
| |
|
| |
| '''@Fawfulfury65''' Under construction or not, it's a page that should be featured, as it's a main component to Mario. {{User|Jbsunshine124}}
| |
| '''[[User:Fire?! flower]]''': It's great! And missing information(I think).--[[User:Fire?! flower|Fire?! flower]] 17:49, 15 October 2011 (EDT)
| |
|
| |
| <s>This may just be my 3DS doing this, but some of the images are just coming up as their names rather than the pictures. {{User|Commander Code-8}}
| |
|
| |
| If there's a reason for this, can someone explain why there are no game and watch titles in this article {{User|Commander Code-8}}</s>
| |
|
| |
| '''@Jbsunshine 124''' Being a main component of the Mario series doesn't make it worth being a featured article. Have you noticed that not even the Mario arrticle is featured? {{User|Commander Code-8}}
| |
|
| |
| From how many time was requested this article to be rewritten? This article was never rewritten, never... --[[User:Super Famicom 64|Super Famicom 64]] 03:12, 10 March 2012 (EST)
| |