Latest revision |
Your text |
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| __NOTOC__ | | __NOTOC__ |
| ===[[Mario (franchise)]]=== | | ===[[Mario (series)]]=== |
| {{FANOMFAIL | | {{FANOMSTAT |
| |nominated=17:30, 30 March 2011 | | |nominated=17:30, 30 March 2011 |
| |lastedit=21:51, 22 April 2012 | | |passed=<!--When it is 5-0, put the time (such as 12:10, 11 December 2009) of the fifth support/removal of last oppose by copying it from the history of the page.--> |
| |nosupport=false
| |
| }} | | }} |
| ==== Support ==== | | ==== Support ==== |
| #{{User|Jose17796}} I would be excited if the Mario series became a feature article! | | #{{User|DKPetey99}} This is probably the second main page of this wiki! It is the Mario series with everything that contains everything Mario. Forget the construction template, besides that, it is a superb page! |
| #{{User|DKPetey99}} This page has a vast amount of info. I don't see any other missing games. Characters, and species seem okay. | | #{{User|Reddragon19k}} |
| #{{User|DK and Diddy Kong vs Bowser and Bowser Jr.}} | | #{{User|DK and Diddy Kong vs Bowser and Bowser Jr.}} |
| #{{User|Weegee010}} | | #{{User|Weegee010}} |
Line 16: |
Line 15: |
| #{{User|Lightblueyoshi}} | | #{{User|Lightblueyoshi}} |
| #{{User|DarthPineapple401}} | | #{{User|DarthPineapple401}} |
| #{{User|Nbradley13}}
| |
| #{{User|Olors}}
| |
| #{{User|Pie4ever0}}
| |
| #{{User|BoygeyDude}}
| |
| #{{User|SUPERZ}}
| |
| #{{User|Jjrapper100}}
| |
| #{{User|Conanshinichi}}
| |
| #{{User|"Luigi Time!"}}
| |
| #{{User|Technickal}}
| |
| #{{User|Likesorange}}
| |
| #{{User|Helper}}
| |
| #{{User|The Knocker}}
| |
| #{{User|Luigirules33}}
| |
| #<s>{{User|Super Famicom 64}}</s> '''I moved my vote to oppose.'''
| |
| #{{User|SoCool21}}
| |
|
| |
|
| ==== Oppose ==== | | ==== Oppose ==== |
Line 44: |
Line 28: |
| #{{User|Catboy41}} Per everything above. | | #{{User|Catboy41}} Per everything above. |
| #{{User|Magikrazy51}} I'll change my vote when we're finished. But for now, per all. | | #{{User|Magikrazy51}} I'll change my vote when we're finished. But for now, per all. |
| #{{User|Superfiremario}} per all
| |
| #{{User|Steverocks27}} rewrite template
| |
| #{{User|Mario Bros.!}} The first thing you see is a rewrite template.
| |
| #{{User|Supremo78}} Per the Hammer Bro. with extreme fury.
| |
| #{{User|IGGY7735}} How could I not agree with a furious hammer-tossing turtle? :D
| |
| #{{User|GEX}}Per all.
| |
| #{{User|Toad85}} Work on putting all the games in first. Per Fawfulfury65.
| |
| #{{User|Goomblob}} Per all..
| |
| #{{User|KS3}} This looks more like a list of everything instead of an article, and a rewrite template is located at the top of the page.
| |
| #{{User|Roads}} Right up at the top of the page is the template that keeps this page below Featured Article standards.
| |
| #{{User|Commander Code-8}} Currently not up to FA standards but can be with lots of editing.
| |
| #{{User|YoshiKong}} If it has a rewrite-expand template, it shouldn't become a featured article.
| |
| #{{User|M&L}} It has a rrewrite-expand template and is missing lots of information. Maybe with a few people all working hard on it it may be good enough to become a FA, but right now, it needs too much work.
| |
| #[[User:'Shroom64]] How can an article become featured if it has some improvement templates? Rule number 5: '''[[MarioWiki:Featured articles|The article must not be tagged with any sort of improvement tags (i.e. rewrite, sectionstub, etc).]]''' But at the top of the article there is a rewrite template and on the "2010-Present" section there is an under construction template. Per all.
| |
| #{{User|Super Famicom 64}} This article was never rewritten even if there was a request for rewriting template.
| |
|
| |
|
| ==== Removal of Opposes ==== | | ==== Removal of Opposes ==== |
Line 67: |
Line 36: |
|
| |
|
| ::Why don't you? He may not own the missing games, thus he can't add the missing info. {{User|Reversinator}} | | ::Why don't you? He may not own the missing games, thus he can't add the missing info. {{User|Reversinator}} |
| :::@Reversinator, just to let you FF65 is female.--{{User|UltraMario3000}} | | :::@Reversinator, just to let you FF65 is female.--{{User:UltraMario3000/sig}} |
|
| |
|
| @DKPetey99: It doesn't matter if it's the second main page. They quality of it is what matters. Also, the construction template is an improvement template, which is not allowed on featured articles. Also, I'd like to add to this article, but I'm a little busy with other articles. {{User|Fawfulfury65}} | | @DKPetey99: It doesn't matter if it's the second main page. They quality of it is what matters. Also, the construction template is an improvement template, which is not allowed on featured articles. Also, I'd like to add to this article, but I'm a little busy with other articles. {{User|Fawfulfury65}} |
Line 103: |
Line 72: |
| @DKPetey's Removal: He said that it was incomplete. {{User|Yoshiwaker}} | | @DKPetey's Removal: He said that it was incomplete. {{User|Yoshiwaker}} |
|
| |
|
| Species list is done, please no one add to it, it may overflow! {{User|DKPetey99}} 12:12, 28 April 2011 (EDT) | | Species list is done, please no one add to it, it may overflow! {{User:DKPetey99/sig}} 12:12, 28 April 2011 (EDT) |
| | |
| '''@DKPetey''' We don't forget about construction templates. So many people do this... They nominate an article to be featured, when they forget about construction templates. {{User|Supremo78}}
| |
| | |
| '''@Fawfulfury65''' Under construction or not, it's a page that should be featured, as it's a main component to Mario. {{User|Jbsunshine124}}
| |
| '''[[User:Fire?! flower]]''': It's great! And missing information(I think).--[[User:Fire?! flower|Fire?! flower]] 17:49, 15 October 2011 (EDT)
| |
| | |
| <s>This may just be my 3DS doing this, but some of the images are just coming up as their names rather than the pictures. {{User|Commander Code-8}}
| |
| | |
| If there's a reason for this, can someone explain why there are no game and watch titles in this article {{User|Commander Code-8}}</s>
| |
| | |
| '''@Jbsunshine 124''' Being a main component of the Mario series doesn't make it worth being a featured article. Have you noticed that not even the Mario arrticle is featured? {{User|Commander Code-8}}
| |
| | |
| From how many time was requested this article to be rewritten? This article was never rewritten, never... --[[User:Super Famicom 64|Super Famicom 64]] 03:12, 10 March 2012 (EST)
| |