Editing MarioWiki:Featured articles/N2/King Boo

__NOTOC__
===[[{{#titleparts:{{PAGENAME}}||3}}]]===
{{FANOMSTAT
|nominated=23 Febraury, 2012, 13:46 GMT
|passed=<!--When it is 5-0, put the time (such as 12:10, 11 December 2009) of the fifth support/removal of last oppose by copying it from the history of the page.-->
}}
==== Support ====
#{{User|Super Famicom 64}}
==== Oppose ====
#{{User|New Super Yoshi}} Some sections are amazing (like the Luigi's Mansion Section) and others are poor (like the Mario Kart DS and Mario and Sonic at the London 2012 Olympic Games). The Mario Kart DS section is horribly written and the Mario and Sonic at the London 2012 Olympic Games section is too short.

==== Removal of Opposes ====

==== Comments ====
Just saying, you don't use N1 for making nominations. N1 is used for archives. If there is already a created page for it (most likely a redirect), put the active nomination in it. It has N instead. {{User|BabyLuigiOnFire}}

I added a rewrite template shortly after making my oppose vote. This template is used after the nomination is created, so saying stuff like, "lolz u didnt c teh temp plate so y u nomin8 it" is not valid. {{User|LeftyGreenMario}}

Um, SuperFamicom, why did you remove the reason for this nomination? We need to know why you think this article merits a featured status. {{User|LeftyGreenMario}}
:He probably got confused over the don't need a reason to surport rule or he didn't like people contradicting his argument it's one of those {{User|Raven Effect}}
::His vote is invalid then if there is no reason to feature. {{User|BabyLuigiOnFire}}
@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 __NOTOC__
 ===[[{{#titleparts:{{PAGENAME}}||3}}]]===
-{{FA archive notice}}
+{{FANOMSTAT
-'''King Boo was nominated to be refeatured at 13:46 GMT 23 February, 2012, and passed at 20:06 GMT, 23 April 2012'''.
+|nominated=23 Febraury, 2012, 13:46 GMT
+|passed=<!--When it is 5-0, put the time (such as 12:10, 11 December 2009) of the fifth support/removal of last oppose by copying it from the history of the page.-->
+}}
 ==== Support ====
-#{{User|Super Famicom 64}} I think there is no improvement template.
+#{{User|Super Famicom 64}}
-#{{User|Hippihippi}}
-#{{User|New Super Yoshi}}
-#{{User|Commander Code-8}}
-#{{User|LeftyGreenMario}}
 ==== Oppose ====
+#{{User|New Super Yoshi}} Some sections are amazing (like the Luigi's Mansion Section) and others are poor (like the Mario Kart DS and Mario and Sonic at the London 2012 Olympic Games). The Mario Kart DS section is horribly written and the Mario and Sonic at the London 2012 Olympic Games section is too short.
 ==== Removal of Opposes ====
@@ Line 22: / Line 20: @@
 :He probably got confused over the don't need a reason to surport rule or he didn't like people contradicting his argument it's one of those {{User|Raven Effect}}
 ::His vote is invalid then if there is no reason to feature. {{User|BabyLuigiOnFire}}
-Okay, i now need help... {{User|Super Famicom 64}}
-Okay, first, HOW does the Mario Kart DS section needs help? If people just say, "it's bad", the reason is not valid. After I tried to improve the grammar of the Mario Kart DS, I want to see if anybody notices a difference. I doubt the people who support the user who opposes even read the section. {{User|LeftyGreenMario}}
-:It's pretty better now. {{User|Super Famicom 64}}
-You shouldn't attempt to remove these votes UNTIL the work is finished. {{User|LeftyGreenMario}}
-@SF64 The Mario Party 9 section needs to be longer, then I'll support. {{User|New Super Yoshi}}
-:How much longer? That's pretty enough in my opinion. {{User|Super Famicom 64}}
-I recently did a major edit on the whole page... Is it good enough yet? King Boo's my favourite character, so I want him Refeatured... If there is something in specific that could need changing, I would gladly do it. [[User:MarioComix|MarioComix]] 00:36, 31 March 2012 (EDT)