| Latest revision |
Your text |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| __NOTOC__ | | __NOTOC__ |
| ===[[{{#titleparts:{{PAGENAME}}||3}}]]=== | | ===[[{{#titleparts:{{PAGENAME}}||3}}]]=== |
| {{FANOMFAIL | | {{FANOMSTAT |
| |nominated=21:02, 29 July 2014 | | |nominated=<!--Time nominated.--> |
| |lastedit=19:31, 12 August 2014 | | |passed=<!--When it is 5-0, put the time (such as 12:10, 11 December 2012) of the fifth support/removal of last oppose by copying it from the history of the page.--> |
| }} | | }} |
| ==== Support ==== | | ==== Support ==== |
| Line 9: |
Line 9: |
| ==== Oppose ==== | | ==== Oppose ==== |
| #{{User|Mario}} It's an article with a scant screenshots and information (except for the transformation and reception section). As of its being nominated, it's barely anything more than a huge list. This article will need a major overhaul before we should even consider it to be featured. | | #{{User|Mario}} It's an article with a scant screenshots and information (except for the transformation and reception section). As of its being nominated, it's barely anything more than a huge list. This article will need a major overhaul before we should even consider it to be featured. |
| #{{User|Vommack}} It's little more than a few lists squashed together.
| | |
| #{{User|Baby Luigi}} Even if this article is featured as a featured list it STILL wouldn't meet featured list requirements. Per all.
| |
| #{{User|Ninelevendo}} Bunch of lists squashed into each other with empty sections. Per all.
| |
| #{{User|ToadAwesome12}} This article is '''''SO PACKED WITH FLOWERY WRITING'''''. Per all.
| |
| #{{User|MarioGameChampion}} Shouldn't even bother, won't get featured anyway. Per all; it's full of lists that could be easily put into chart form with more detail on each of its items. Currently only contains 4 paragraphs of written sentences.
| |
| #{{User|SmartYoshi}}Per all. Not enough pictures.
| |
| #{{User|Peteyking64}} Too many lists.
| |
| #{{User|BabyLuigi73}} How to make this article better: Actual writing and more images.
| |
| #{{User|Pwwnd123}} Per all. It isn't a whole lot but it is still relatively short to even be featured. A majority of it is quite empty. In other words I oppose.
| |
| ==== Removal of Opposes ==== | | ==== Removal of Opposes ==== |
|
| |
|
| ==== Comments ==== | | ==== Comments ==== |
| Oh come on first you think an article is too short' and now it's too long. I don't understand you! {{User:Joseph/sig}}
| |
| :And I don't understand you, because she never said it was too long.--[[User:Vommack|Vommack]] ([[User talk:Vommack|talk]]) 15:37, 30 July 2014 (EDT)
| |
| Who's "you"? Joseph, not Vommack. {{User:ToadAwesome12/sig}} 11:44, 31 July 2014 (EDT)
| |
|
| |
| I'm pretty sure Joseph is referring to me, since after my vote, the only major edit was Joseph's comment. Anyway <sub>I'm female</sub>, I never said it was too long. I did, however, say that the article is low quality and just pretty bad. Just compare it to other featured game-related articles including [[Super Mario Bros. 2]], [[Mario vs. Donkey Kong]], [[Wario Land II]], [[New Super Mario Bros.]]. Even [[Yoshi's Island DS]], one of the worse featured articles, has more information, details, and it meets the bare requirements. Even [[Super Mario 3D World]] and [[Super Mario Bros.]], which aren't featured at this writing, are in much better shape than this. Length is not an issue, and even then, most of these articles are longer than this one. {{User:Mario/sig}} 19:01, 31 July 2014 (EDT)
| |
| :...I'll just fix my comment then...--[[User:Vommack|Vommack]] ([[User talk:Vommack|talk]]) 21:08, 1 August 2014 (EDT)
| |
|
| |
| [[Category:FA failure archives|Y]]
| |
