Editing MarioWiki:Featured articles/N1/Wario Land 4
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
__NOTOC__ | __NOTOC__ | ||
===[[{{#titleparts:{{PAGENAME}}||3}}]]=== | ===[[{{#titleparts:{{PAGENAME}}||3}}]]=== | ||
{{ | {{FANOMSTAT | ||
|nominated=1:12, 4 October 2012 | |nominated=1:12, 4 October 2012 | ||
| | |passed=<!--When it is 5-0, put the time (such as 12:10, 11 December 2009) of the fifth support/removal of last oppose by copying it from the history of the page.--> | ||
}} | }} | ||
==== Support ==== | ==== Support ==== | ||
#{{User|YoshiKong}} About a year ago, ''Wario Land 4'' was a poorly written article with more stubs, red links and missing info than you could poke a keyboard at! Slowly, but surely, the 20+ stubs were expanded, all red links and missing info filled, and every page in [[:Category:Wario Land 4|it's category]] cleaned up and rewritten. So come on, lets get this great article the featured status it deserves! | #{{User|YoshiKong}} About a year ago, ''Wario Land 4'' was a poorly written article with more stubs, red links and missing info than you could poke a keyboard at! Slowly, but surely, the 20+ stubs were expanded, all red links and missing info filled, and every page in [[:Category:Wario Land 4|it's category]] cleaned up and rewritten. So come on, lets get this great article the featured status it deserves! | ||
#{{User|SmartYoshi}} | #{{User|SmartYoshi}} | ||
==== Oppose ==== | ==== Oppose ==== | ||
==== Removal of Opposes ==== | ==== Removal of Opposes ==== | ||
Line 24: | Line 17: | ||
I haven't checked the article in-depth, but there are bits of POV ("[The game] enjoyed well-deserved praise") and odd writing ("The game got good reviews... [for] its general thrill of satisfaction" whaaaa?) in the intro. Not a good sign. --[[User:Glowsquid|Glowsquid]] ([[User talk:Glowsquid|talk]]) 08:44, 6 October 2012 (EDT) | I haven't checked the article in-depth, but there are bits of POV ("[The game] enjoyed well-deserved praise") and odd writing ("The game got good reviews... [for] its general thrill of satisfaction" whaaaa?) in the intro. Not a good sign. --[[User:Glowsquid|Glowsquid]] ([[User talk:Glowsquid|talk]]) 08:44, 6 October 2012 (EDT) | ||