Editing MarioWiki:Featured articles/N1/Vivian
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
__NOTOC__ | __NOTOC__ | ||
===[[{{#titleparts:{{PAGENAME}}||3}}]]=== | |||
{{FANOMSTAT | |||
===[[{{ | |nominated=01:40, 8 April 2014 (GMT) | ||
|passed=<!--When it is 5-0, put the time (such as 12:10, 11 December 2012) of the fifth support/removal of last oppose by copying it from the history of the page.--> | |||
}} | |||
==== Support ==== | ==== Support ==== | ||
#{{User|DaisyLuigi}} This article is very well written. It includes well-written history, a great foreign language template, and the pictures are a good size, and have reasonable captions. Overall, it's a great article that is very popular in [[Paper Mario: The Thousand Year Door]], where she is a main character, so I support. | #{{User|DaisyLuigi}} This article is very well written. It includes well-written history, a great foreign language template, and the pictures are a good size, and have reasonable captions. Overall, it's a great article that is very popular in [[Paper Mario: The Thousand Year Door]], where she is a main character, so I support. | ||
#{{User|Ashley and Red}} | #{{User|Ashley and Red}} | ||
#{{User|Fluffy_Bluff_Galaxy}} | #{{User|Fluffy_Bluff_Galaxy}} This article is very detailed, well-written, non-biased, and overall reliable. The History section is very well written and described. I support. | ||
==== Oppose ==== | ==== Oppose ==== | ||
#{{User|Yoshi876}} Like you said there are a few things that need to be fixed. Until these problems are fixed the article cannot be featured. | |||
==== Removal of Opposes ==== | ==== Removal of Opposes ==== | ||
Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
:::Removing perfectly good information is a ''horrible'' way to go about "improving" a page. The gender stuff is important and interesting, and at only two paragraphs,it's not too large at all, it's just thorough, which is a good thing. And if anything, the extensive references are one of the page's strengths: citations give the wiki credibility and make us more professional-grade, and in this case in particular, having hard video proof and our own original translation work stops people from baselessly trying to white-wash the gender stuff, since we can say "uh, no, it's real, leave it alone". - {{User:Walkazo/sig}} 20:33, 16 April 2014 (EDT) | :::Removing perfectly good information is a ''horrible'' way to go about "improving" a page. The gender stuff is important and interesting, and at only two paragraphs,it's not too large at all, it's just thorough, which is a good thing. And if anything, the extensive references are one of the page's strengths: citations give the wiki credibility and make us more professional-grade, and in this case in particular, having hard video proof and our own original translation work stops people from baselessly trying to white-wash the gender stuff, since we can say "uh, no, it's real, leave it alone". - {{User:Walkazo/sig}} 20:33, 16 April 2014 (EDT) | ||
::::Thanks for clearing that up, I wasn't sure. {{User:DaisyLuigi/sig}} | ::::Thanks for clearing that up, I wasn't sure. {{User:DaisyLuigi/sig}} | ||