| Latest revision |
Your text |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| __NOTOC__ | | __NOTOC__ |
| ===[[{{SUBPAGENAME}}]]=== | | ===[[{{SUBPAGENAME}}]]=== |
| {{FANOMFAIL | | {{FANOMSTAT |
| |nominated=2:10, 11 August 2010 (GMT) | | |nominated=at 2:10, 11 August 2010 (GMT) |
| |lastedit= 22:10, 28 October 2010 (GMT) | | |passed=<!--When it is 5-0, put the time (such as 12:10, 11 December 2009) of the fifth support/removal of last opposet by copying it from the history of the page.--> |
| }} | | }} |
| ==== Support ==== | | ==== Support ==== |
| #{{User|Mario Fan 123}} - It's a very good article, well written, great gameplay section, many images, good story, links... It's perfect, and I think it deserves to be a Featued Article. Ah, and there's no 'rewrite' template anymore. | | #{{User|Mario Fan 123}} - It's a very good article, well written, great gameplay section, many images, good story, links... It's perfect, and I think it deserves to be a Featued Article. |
| #{{User|Toadwell}} | | #{{User|Toadwell}} |
| #{{User|Dry dry bones}}
| |
| #{{User|IandaM}}
| |
| #{{User|SKmarioman}}
| |
| #{{User|marioboy296}}
| |
| #{{User|GoWeegee}}
| |
| #{{User|Yoshi986}}
| |
| #{{User|Bowser's luma}}
| |
|
| |
|
| ==== Oppose ==== | | ==== Oppose ==== |
| Line 20: |
Line 13: |
| #{{User|Baby Mario Bloops}} - Seriously, not ready yet. The images are very plentiful at the beginning, but the bottom half of the article is just image-less. Also, per all that BLOF said. | | #{{User|Baby Mario Bloops}} - Seriously, not ready yet. The images are very plentiful at the beginning, but the bottom half of the article is just image-less. Also, per all that BLOF said. |
| #{{User|New Super Mario}} Per BLOF | | #{{User|New Super Mario}} Per BLOF |
| #{{User|Fawfulfury65}} What's that blue template at the top of the page doing there?
| |
| #{{User|Fuzzipede27}} - It has a rewritten template and it's not ready yet.
| |
| #{{User|Mario jc}} Per BLOF.
| |
| #{{User|Booderdash}} Per me. No, just kidding, per all.
| |
| #{{User|M&SG}} - You can't feature articles with rewrite templates. Also, there are still some things that need fixing on that article before it qualifies for a feature request.
| |
| #{{User|Mario4Ever}} Per BLOF and BMB, but I don't think the story section can be improved all that much. After all, it's a Mario game. If it does, I have to say that even so, this is one of the most well-written articles I've encountered on the wiki, but it's not FA material yet, unfortunately.
| |
| #{{User|Commander Code-8}} Why are there so many images in the story section?? It's also a bit too soon to be an FA.
| |
| #{{User|Cat91x}} Per Fuzzipede27.
| |
| #{{User|CosmicRedToad}} um... don't the rules say they can't have a rewrite template?
| |
| #{{User|Beecanoe}} On the other hand... the article is fairly new, and, in a way, not well kept. This article is questionable. I played both sides, but I'm more supportive of opposing the nomination.
| |
| #{{User|Dry Paratroopa}} If the article or a section of it needs to be rewritten then it doesn't show itself as one of the wiki's "best" articles IMO.
| |
| #{{User|Superboo922}}- Per CMT
| |
| #{{User|SWFlash}} Some titles have no images, some references refs to gameplay. And per everyone above and below
| |
| #{{User|ThomasO}} Featured article != Needs rewriting.
| |
|
| |
|
| ==== Removal of Opposes ==== | | ==== Removal of Opposes ==== |
| Line 43: |
Line 22: |
|
| |
|
| :So? We can add an image of the enemy at the top of the list. Just like the "New Enemies" section. But we can add an image of the E3 revealing. {{User|BabyLuigiOnFire}} | | :So? We can add an image of the enemy at the top of the list. Just like the "New Enemies" section. But we can add an image of the E3 revealing. {{User|BabyLuigiOnFire}} |
|
| |
| I think it also needs a Controls section. It could also use some more pictures... maybe just a little more. They are all jamed into the "Story" section. {{User|New Super Mario}}
| |
|
| |
| @Fawfulfury65: I added that, because of my reasons listed here. It was there after it was put up for nomination. {{User|BabyLuigiOnFire}}
| |
|
| |
| LeftyGreenMario/New Super Mario: I disagree on adding the controls section they are not that important for the article as the gameplay and there not many of them on other game pages anyway. {{User|Lindsay151}}
| |
| :She didn't suggest to be added, she just said it might be needed. Mario Power Tennis is one prime example. {{User|BabyLuigiOnFire}}
| |
|
| |
| Mario Fan 123: There is now. It got placed back because apparently someone tried removing it to make it an invalid reason to oppose this article. {{User|BabyLuigiOnFire}}
| |
|
| |
| @Supporters: Guys, you realize that this article can't be featured with a rewrite template, right? {{User|Fawfulfury65}}
| |
| :They're fanboys. They'll support no matter what flaws it has, and with reasons for support votes removed, it just makes it worse. I mean, look at how many people supported [[MarioWiki:Featured Articles/Archive/N1/Mario|Mario]], despite the ton of flaws with it. {{unsigned|Reversinator}}
| |
| ::First, you can't just assume they are fanboys. Second, the support does no harm other than unnecessarily bumping the nomination. {{User|LeftyGreenMario}}
| |
|
| |
| @IandaM: You supported twice. {{user|Mario jc}}
| |
