| Latest revision |
Your text |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| __NOTOC__ | | __NOTOC__ |
| ===[[{{#titleparts:{{PAGENAME}}||3}}]]=== | | ===[[{{#titleparts:{{PAGENAME}}||3}}]]=== |
| {{FANOMFAIL | | {{FANOMSTAT |
| |nominated=08:33, 24 July 2012 | | |nominated=08:33, 24 July 2012 |
| |lastedit=18:42, 21 october 2012 | | |passed=<!--When it is 5-0, put the time (such as 12:10, 11 December 2009) of the fifth support/removal of last oppose by copying it from the history of the page.--> |
| |nosupport=true
| |
| }} | | }} |
|
| |
| ==== Support ==== | | ==== Support ==== |
| #{{User|Spenzer66}} I surely agree, its wonderful | | #{{User|Spenzer66}} I surely agree, its wonderful |
| #{{User|Jose17796}}
| |
|
| |
|
| ==== Oppose ==== | | ==== Oppose ==== |
| #{{User|GreenDisaster}} First, "its wonderful" is not a good reason. How is it wonderful? You need to elaborate on that. Also, who are you agreeing with? The article itself is incredibly lackluster. I know we can't exactly add much info to a tech demo, but that's precisely why it can't be a featured article. It's just a relatively small intro, a list, and a single trivia piece. For a featured ''list'', that could work, but this is supposed to be an article, so no go. | | #{{User|GreenDisaster}} First, "its wonderful" is not a good reason. How is it wonderful? You need to elaborate on that. Also, who are you agreeing with? The article itself is incredibly lackluster. I know we can't exactly add much info to a tech demo, but that's precisely why it can't be a featured article. It's just a relatively small intro, a list, and a single trivia piece. For a featured ''list'', that could work, but this is supposed to be an article, so no go. |
| #{{User|Electrical Bowser jr.}} Per GreenDisaster. If I felt like it, I bet I could correctly ''count'' the amout of words on this article.
| |
| #{{User|Commander Code-8}} This article is just a list. It wouldn't even work as a featured list because... Well I don't even have to say it
| |
| #{{user|Bloc Partier}} - Terrible. Why is this even still a nomination? There is no way it will ever meet the word count, nor is it even a true list.
| |
| #{{user|Mario jc}} Per all.
| |
| #{{User|Lakituthequick}} Le per all.
| |
| #{{User|MeritC}} Wha...? No. Just no. This even wouldn't fit criteria to be a featured article at all.
| |
| #{{User|Master R.O.B}} Nothing I can say that the other opposers haven't already said.
| |
| #{{User|YoshiKong}} Doesn't seem wonderful, nor feature standard to ''any'' extent. Per all.
| |
| #{{User|Exo}} Per all. There's nothing on this page!
| |
| #{{User|LuigiBlubber}} This shouldn't become featured! It's a tech demo!
| |
| #{{User|Tails777}} Per all, it's not really even an article, it's just a list of things that would have been in a game.
| |
| #{{User|The 463}} To be honest, I don't see the point in this being here. maybe on the mario wikia, but not here. Let alone it being a featured article here.
| |
| #{{User|Koopa K}} It is too short.
| |
| #{{User|World10}} All per.
| |
| #{{User|LightningBlue}} First off it is a game that has not even been released yet. Not to mention there is very little information on it at this point.
| |
| #{{User|Mariobros1985}} This game won't even be released; New Super Mario Bros U should be featured instead.
| |
| #{{User|Akfamilyhome}} Wow, seriously? I mean, this is a page about a tech demo, with little amount of info, with just a list of characters and objects. Per all. This really should not be a featured article.
| |
| #{{User|MarioSmasher}} This makes me wonder why the proposal for "Enforce Support Reasoning for FA Nominations" was MAJORILY opposed and led to nonsense reasons while nominating.
| |
| #{{User|MarioGameChampion}} I don't really think I need an explanation.
| |
| #{{User|Mario Fan 123}} Per all. Is the reason for featuring the article even serious? Sounds more like a joke.
| |
| #{{User|Ultramariologan}} Per all, and it doesn't really have much pictures. I know, it has a gallery and all, but it doesn't even have any actual artwork.
| |
| #{{User|Vommack}} As a featured list, I would very well support it, but the problem is, this isn't supposed to be a list.
| |
|
| |
|
| ==== Removal of Opposes ==== | | ==== Removal of Opposes ==== |
|
| |
|
| ==== Comments ==== | | ==== Comments ==== |
