| Latest revision |
Your text |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| __NOTOC__ | | __NOTOC__ |
| ===[[{{#titleparts:{{PAGENAME}}||3}}]]=== | | ===[[{{#titleparts:{{PAGENAME}}||3}}]]=== |
| {{FANOMFAIL | | {{FANOMSTAT |
| |nominated=11:10, 31 July 2013 (EDT) | | |nominated=11:10, 31 July 2013 (EDT) |
| |lastedit=15:10, 30 August 2013 (EDT) | | |passed=<!--When it is 5-0, put the time (such as 12:10, 11 December 2012) of the fifth support/removal of last oppose by copying it from the history of the page.--> |
| }} | | }} |
| ==== Support ==== | | ==== Support ==== |
| #{{User|Gonzales Kart Inc.}} The page is well written, no typos, is long enough, and has enough pictures. There are no tags, it's detailed, and the trivia section is good size. | | #{{User|Gonzales Kart Inc.}} The page is well written, no typos, is long enough, and has enough pictures. There are no tags, it's detailed, and the trivia section is good size. |
| #{{User|Mario7}} | | #{{User|Mario7}} |
| #{{User|AGoombaAndaPikmin}}
| |
|
| |
|
| ==== Oppose ==== | | ==== Oppose ==== |
| #{{User|Yoshi876}} <s>I disagree with the trivia, I think it's far too long, and the starting section isn't long enough.</s> Per the users below me. | | #{{User|Yoshi876}} I disagree with the trivia, I think it's far too long, and the starting section isn't long enough. |
| #{{User|LeftyGreenMario}} The beginning section is long enough and the trivia is gone, but nothing can be done to increase the length of this incredibly short article without padding, and it doesn't qualify according to the proposal I referred in the comments section.
| |
| #{{User|Tails777}} As much as I would like to see this article featured, I feel that the now incorporated trivia makes the starting paragraph seem a bit messy and rather unorganized.
| |
| #{{User|Pinkie Pie}} As far as I'm concerned, the incorporated trivia make the article feel like it needs to be rewritten.
| |
| #{{User|Scr7}} Per LeftyGreenMario.
| |
| #{{User|Freakworld}} Per LGM.
| |
|
| |
|
| ==== Removal of Opposes ==== | | ==== Removal of Opposes ==== |
| Line 28: |
Line 22: |
| :::Remove trivia and incorporate it into the main article and starting section. {{User|Yoshi876}} | | :::Remove trivia and incorporate it into the main article and starting section. {{User|Yoshi876}} |
| ::::Three trivia pieces: half of what it was. {{User|Gonzales Kart Inc.}} | | ::::Three trivia pieces: half of what it was. {{User|Gonzales Kart Inc.}} |
|
| |
| Thanks Mario7. I forgot I could do that {{User|Gonzales Kart Inc.}}
| |
| :Isn't the article a bit on the short side? I know there was a [http://www.mariowiki.com/MarioWiki:Proposals/Archive/34#Change_FA_size_requirement proposal about shortening the length of articles], but since its provisions are so vague, I don't know if this even qualifies. {{User|LeftyGreenMario}}
| |
| ::As the proposer of that proposal I don't think so, I know I thought [[Grouchy Possessor]] was long enough in that proposal, but I think that is too short now, same with this considering, at least for me, it takes 2 presses of PgDn to reach the bottom. {{User|Yoshi876}}
| |
|
| |
| If I knew what padding was... {{User|Gonzales Kart Inc.}}
| |
| :It's filler. It's only purpose is to make the article longer and to suffer quality for quantity is never a good idea. {{User|Baby Luigi}}
| |
| ::Padding would be adding unnecessary, redundant words. For example, you can change "Luigi is Mario's younger twin brother because he is born later." to "The reason why Luigi is Mario's younger twin sibling who is related to him is because of the fact that he is given birth in a later manner". Padding like that deteriorates the quality of the work because it's harder to read and keep reading and, thus, is strongly discouraged.{{User|LeftyGreenMario}}
| |
