Editing MarioWiki:Featured articles/N1/Miracle Book
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
| Latest revision | Your text | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
__NOTOC__ | __NOTOC__ | ||
===[[{{#titleparts:{{PAGENAME}}||3}}]]=== | ===[[{{#titleparts:{{PAGENAME}}||3}}]]=== | ||
{{ | {{FANOMSTAT | ||
|nominated=05:53, 17 December 2013 | |||
|passed=<!--When it is 5-0, put the time (such as 12:10, 11 December 2012) of the fifth support/removal of last oppose by copying it from the history of the page.--> | |||
}} | |||
==== Support ==== | ==== Support ==== | ||
#{{User|Baby Luigi}} I think this qualifies for a great featured list. It's reasonably long, it's complete, the summary has a decent length and it has an extra gallery filled with pictures from the book. I worked hard on getting high quality images via emulator, and I think it would look nice. Just because it has barely any words doesn't mean it won't look great: pictures can describe more than words, and featuring this article proves this point. Think of the pictures as another way of adding in-game descriptions like the other Featured Lists. | #{{User|Baby Luigi}} I think this qualifies for a great featured list. It's reasonably long, it's complete, the summary has a decent length and it has an extra gallery filled with pictures from the book. I worked hard on getting high quality images via emulator, and I think it would look nice. Just because it has barely any words doesn't mean it won't look great: pictures can describe more than words, and featuring this article proves this point. Think of the pictures as another way of adding in-game descriptions like the other Featured Lists. | ||
| Line 9: | Line 10: | ||
#{{User|LeftyGreenMario}} | #{{User|LeftyGreenMario}} | ||
#{{User|Icemario11}} | #{{User|Icemario11}} | ||
==== Oppose ==== | ==== Oppose ==== | ||
| Line 19: | Line 18: | ||
The article does look good, but maybe adding short descriptions of each page could make it even better. Just a suggestion, not saying anything is wrong with the article in its current state. {{User|Tails777}} | The article does look good, but maybe adding short descriptions of each page could make it even better. Just a suggestion, not saying anything is wrong with the article in its current state. {{User|Tails777}} | ||
:We probably don't need short descriptions, though, since a picture is worth a thousand words. Much as with the majority of the image captions in this wiki, the short descriptions will only point out what readers can figure out. {{User|LeftyGreenMario}} | :We probably don't need short descriptions, though, since a picture is worth a thousand words. Much as with the majority of the image captions in this wiki, the short descriptions will only point out what readers can figure out. {{User|LeftyGreenMario}} | ||
