Editing MarioWiki:Featured articles/N1/Mario Superstar Baseball
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
__NOTOC__ | __NOTOC__ | ||
===[[{{SUBPAGENAME}}]]=== | ===[[{{SUBPAGENAME}}]]=== | ||
{{FANOMSTAT | |||
{{ | |nominated=22:30, 18 July 2010 (UTC) | ||
|passed=<!--When it is 5-0, put the time (such as 12:10, 11 December 2009) of the fifth support/removal of last oppose by copying it from the history of the page.--> | |||
}} | |||
==== Support ==== | ==== Support ==== | ||
#{{User|BabyLuigiOnFire}} Well-written, lots of images, very detailed. I think it's ready to become featured! | #{{User|BabyLuigiOnFire}} Well-written, lots of images, very detailed. I think it's ready to become featured! | ||
Line 9: | Line 10: | ||
#{{User|LeftyGreenMario}} | #{{User|LeftyGreenMario}} | ||
#{{User|MeritC}} | #{{User|MeritC}} | ||
==== Oppose ==== | ==== Oppose ==== | ||
#{{User| | #{{User|KS3}}<s> Options and Records sections need expansion.</s> Per Booderdash. @Supporters: Please take a look at the pictures again. The Bedlem article is undergoing a unfeature nomination because it has horrible quality images. | ||
#{{User|Booderdash}} | #{{User|Booderdash}} Nearly EVERY SINGLE IMAGE IS '''HORRIBLE''' quality! They're terrible! Look at them! Especially Mario and Daisy's. You can see its fuzzy even from a distance! Very very very very very very etc. blurry. And if you zoom in... "shudder" | ||
==== Removal of Opposes ==== | ==== Removal of Opposes ==== | ||
''' | '''KS3''' | ||
#{{User|BabyLuigiOnFire}} | #{{User|BabyLuigiOnFire}} Records is already expanded, and the options could not be expanded anymore (that's basically it for the options. Adjusting music, setting sound system, and rumble settings). Plus, he pers a user, who claims that every single image is horrible quality, which isn't horrible quality. | ||
#{{User|LeftyGreenMario}} Per BabyLuigiOnFire. | #{{User|LeftyGreenMario}} How can they be expanded anymore? Per BabyLuigiOnFire | ||
'''Booderdash''' | |||
#{{User|BabyLuigiOnFire}} First, he pers a user with an invalid reason. Second, they are NOT terrible quality. They are moderate quality, but not TERRIBLE | |||
#{{User|LeftyGreenMario}} He said nearly every single image, not all. But what did you expect, extremely sharp quality screenshots taken from a specialized site? Looks fine to me. Please. If you can show us a better screenshot taker, tell me. | |||
#{{User|MeritC}} Per all. | |||
==== Comments ==== | ==== Comments ==== | ||
Would be nice if there was a description for all stadiums. {{User|LeftyGreenMario}} | Would be nice if there was a description for all stadiums. {{User|LeftyGreenMario}} | ||
:Why? Super Sluggers had no description. But, I guess I could do it. It's better to have more information. {{User|BabyLuigiOnFire}} | :Why? Super Sluggers had no description. But, I guess I could do it. It's better to have more information. {{User|BabyLuigiOnFire}} | ||
Do you think we need a section for the Star Power? {{User|LeftyGreenMario}} | Do you think we need a section for the Star Power? {{User|LeftyGreenMario}} | ||
:Well, the captain's section have their team power, but if you insist... {{User|BabyLuigiOnFire}} | :Well, the captain's section have their team power, but if you insist... {{User|BabyLuigiOnFire}} | ||
Most of the images of characters are screenshots and aren't that good. Should the ones that are replaceable be replaced. {{User|Commander Code-8}} | Most of the images of characters are screenshots and aren't that good. Should the ones that are replaceable be replaced. {{User|Commander Code-8}} | ||
Line 45: | Line 38: | ||
:::Unfortunately, only the team captains have game art. It really stinks {{User|BabyLuigiOnFire}} | :::Unfortunately, only the team captains have game art. It really stinks {{User|BabyLuigiOnFire}} | ||
:::: In my words, I mean that the screenshots are fine. They don't have to be super-crystal clear unlike sprites. {{User|LeftyGreenMario}} | :::: In my words, I mean that the screenshots are fine. They don't have to be super-crystal clear unlike sprites. {{User|LeftyGreenMario}} | ||
KS3: I can't expand the modes you mentioned anymore than it is. {{User|BabyLuigiOnFire}} | KS3: I can't expand the modes you mentioned anymore than it is. {{User|BabyLuigiOnFire}} | ||
Booderdash: Every SINGLE image? Ok. Define, "ok quality" or even "acceptable quality", because they are NOT horrible quality. I've said this before, and I'll say it again: even a [[User:MeritC|system operator]] agrees with me it is fine {{User|BabyLuigiOnFire}} | Booderdash: Every SINGLE image? Ok. Define, "ok quality" or even "acceptable quality", because they are NOT horrible quality. I've said this before, and I'll say it again: even a [[User:MeritC|system operator]] agrees with me it is fine {{User|BabyLuigiOnFire}} | ||
BooDash: You know that good quality image you've been saying out? This is the same quality image, but cropped. Maybe it's how it's zoomed in makes you say it's horrible quality {{User|LeftyGreenMario}} | BooDash: You know that good quality image you've been saying out? This is the same quality image, but cropped. Maybe it's how it's zoomed in makes you say it's horrible quality {{User|LeftyGreenMario}} | ||
:It's not zoomed in. It's cropped directly from a screenshot. {{User|BabyLuigiOnFire}} | :It's not zoomed in. It's cropped directly from a screenshot. {{User|BabyLuigiOnFire}} | ||
::Look at this image: [[File:DaisySelectMSB. | ::Look at this image: [[File:DaisySelectMSB.PNG]], Its HORRIBLE, look how the eyes are like water colored and seem to be dripping off the image. Look how it seems fuzzy. I thought at first, my eyes were going blind! {{User|Booderdash}} | ||
It's not BLOF's fault that the game has bad graphics. {{User|Fawfulfury65}} | |||
::: Doesn't look so bad to me. We don't have crytal-clear quality screenshot-takers. {{User|LeftyGreenMario}} | ::: Doesn't look so bad to me. We don't have crytal-clear quality screenshot-takers. {{User|LeftyGreenMario}} | ||
::::What do you mean? Its really blurry. Look at them more clearly. All of them are very blurry. I don't know why but it is. {{User|Booderdash}} | ::::What do you mean? Its really blurry. Look at them more clearly. All of them are very blurry. I don't know why but it is. {{User|Booderdash}} | ||
Line 72: | Line 58: | ||
Booderdash:Can I remind you that these pages have no-signature policies. {{User|Commander Code-8}} | Booderdash:Can I remind you that these pages have no-signature policies. {{User|Commander Code-8}} | ||
::I know, I know, I'm sorry. I just keep on forgetting. {{User|Booderdash}} | ::I know, I know, I'm sorry. I just keep on forgetting. {{User|Booderdash}} | ||
Blof you're a very good screen shot taker, so can you at least try again on just the Daisy one? That one, I'm serious, makes my eyes feel weird. {{User|Booderdash}} | Blof you're a very good screen shot taker, so can you at least try again on just the Daisy one? That one, I'm serious, makes my eyes feel weird. {{User|Booderdash}} | ||
This image is low quality too: [[File:GoodChemistry.PNG|100px]] | |||
This image is low quality too: [[File:GoodChemistry. | |||
:It's certainly NOT. {{User|LeftyGreenMario}} | :It's certainly NOT. {{User|LeftyGreenMario}} | ||
::Yes it is, look at baby mario. {{User|Booderdash}} | ::Yes it is, look at baby mario. {{User|Booderdash}} | ||
Guys, how many times I have to mention this: They are NOT low quality. They are not the best quality either. They are somewhere in the middle, but absolutely NOT low quality. {{User|BabyLuigiOnFire}} | Guys, how many times I have to mention this: They are NOT low quality. They are not the best quality either. They are somewhere in the middle, but absolutely NOT low quality. {{User|BabyLuigiOnFire}} | ||
Line 91: | Line 70: | ||
:::Image quality is not an opinion. It's a fact. It's possible to prove a fact right or wrong, but you cannot do so with opinions. It's moderate quality. Not bad. I've seen worse quality images on the wiki and they are slapped with image quality tags. Besides, MeritC is a system operator; she probably knows more than me. {{User|BabyLuigiOnFire}} | :::Image quality is not an opinion. It's a fact. It's possible to prove a fact right or wrong, but you cannot do so with opinions. It's moderate quality. Not bad. I've seen worse quality images on the wiki and they are slapped with image quality tags. Besides, MeritC is a system operator; she probably knows more than me. {{User|BabyLuigiOnFire}} | ||
:::: Well your definition of image quality seems like opinion. Its not a fact. its how we think of an image. For example if a guy who always sees good quality image sees this s/he will call it bad quality. If a person always sees bad quality, s/he will call this good quality. Plus, sysops aren't god. They only know most about the wiki, not about quality in general. {{User|Booderdash}} | :::: Well your definition of image quality seems like opinion. Its not a fact. its how we think of an image. For example if a guy who always sees good quality image sees this s/he will call it bad quality. If a person always sees bad quality, s/he will call this good quality. Plus, sysops aren't god. They only know most about the wiki, not about quality in general. {{User|Booderdash}} | ||
KS3: Yeah, and apparently, [[Beldam|it's]] going to be unfeatured any time soon. {{User|BabyLuigiOnFire}} | KS3: Yeah, and apparently, [[Beldam|it's]] going to be unfeatured any time soon. {{User|BabyLuigiOnFire}} | ||