Editing MarioWiki:Featured articles/N1/Mario & Luigi: Bowser's Inside Story
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
__NOTOC__ | __NOTOC__ | ||
===[[Mario & Luigi: Bowser's Inside Story]]=== | ===[[Mario & Luigi: Bowser's Inside Story]]=== | ||
{{ | {{FANOMSTAT | ||
|nominated=21:03, 31 October 2009 | |||
|passed=<!--When it is 5-0, put the time (such as 12:10, 11 December 2009) of the fifth support/removal of last oppose by copying it from the history of the page.--> | |||
}} | |||
==== Support ==== | ==== Support ==== | ||
#{{User|MATEOELBACAN}} This article is very detailed,has much images,sections this must be a FA! | #{{User|MATEOELBACAN}} This article is very detailed,has much images,sections this must be a FA! | ||
Line 31: | Line 32: | ||
#{{User|Yoshi104}} | #{{User|Yoshi104}} | ||
#{{User|Kirbythestar}} | #{{User|Kirbythestar}} | ||
#{{User|LuigiMaster42}} | |||
#{{User|Koopayoshi}} | #{{User|Koopayoshi}} | ||
#{{User|StormyTheGreat}} | #{{User|StormyTheGreat}} | ||
Line 51: | Line 53: | ||
#{{User|GoWeegee}} | #{{User|GoWeegee}} | ||
#{{User|IandaM}} | #{{User|IandaM}} | ||
==== Oppose ==== | ==== Oppose ==== | ||
#{{User|BabyLuigiOnFire}} - <s>I don't think the picture of Wiggler is in its battle pose.</s> Plus, some of the large boss sprites are bad quality. | |||
#{{User|LeftyGreenMario}} - If only that Super Peach Castle (or whatever that is) has great quality, I'LL finally support! | |||
==== Removal of Opposes ==== | ==== Removal of Opposes ==== | ||
Line 77: | Line 73: | ||
:Other Bestiary??!!-WTF?!--{{User|MATEOELBACAN}} 08:58, 29 November 2009 (EST) | :Other Bestiary??!!-WTF?!--{{User|MATEOELBACAN}} 08:58, 29 November 2009 (EST) | ||
::It's the standard that technically must be done anyways. Just make a motion to split it, then work on it later while this article can be featured without it. [[User:Redstar|Redstar]] 09:01, 29 November 2009 (EST) | ::It's the standard that technically must be done anyways. Just make a motion to split it, then work on it later while this article can be featured without it. [[User:Redstar|Redstar]] 09:01, 29 November 2009 (EST) | ||
:::It not a standard. There's no "All FAs have to have a bestiary" or anything like that for the FA requirements. Check the [[MarioWiki:Featured | :::It not a standard. There's no "All FAs have to have a bestiary" or anything like that for the FA requirements. Check the [[MarioWiki:Featured Articles]] page and look under the FA Standards section. {{User|Fawfulfury65}} | ||
::::Per FF65, why does it have to be the Mario & Luigi Series so suddenly. We have bestiary for Paper Mario, because that is because the game has a bestiary since you can tattle on enemies. There is not bestiary related stuff in the Mario & Luigi series! Also, why this series, why are you not changing or rewriting stuff on other articles that are in worse shape than this one. This one and there series of Mario & Luigi have great articles, with a flaw or a few, but that is beyond my point. We don't need to rewrite entire pages and sections just to change the page into what you want it to look like. The bestiary stuff, we don't need it for this series!!!!! Please, many users worked hours, days, even weeks on this just for it to reach a high level like this. Don't change it just because you have major issues with grammar or small information is missing from the already long story section!!!!!!!!!!! {{User|Baby Mario Bloops}} | ::::Per FF65, why does it have to be the Mario & Luigi Series so suddenly. We have bestiary for Paper Mario, because that is because the game has a bestiary since you can tattle on enemies. There is not bestiary related stuff in the Mario & Luigi series! Also, why this series, why are you not changing or rewriting stuff on other articles that are in worse shape than this one. This one and there series of Mario & Luigi have great articles, with a flaw or a few, but that is beyond my point. We don't need to rewrite entire pages and sections just to change the page into what you want it to look like. The bestiary stuff, we don't need it for this series!!!!! Please, many users worked hours, days, even weeks on this just for it to reach a high level like this. Don't change it just because you have major issues with grammar or small information is missing from the already long story section!!!!!!!!!!! {{User|Baby Mario Bloops}} | ||
:Why not make this into a proposal? Other users can choose on if there should or shouldn't be a bestiary. {{User|Fawfulfury65}} | :Why not make this into a proposal? Other users can choose on if there should or shouldn't be a bestiary. {{User|Fawfulfury65}} | ||
Line 128: | Line 124: | ||
: :( , that's not helping out with the situation. Maybe you can look for the picture? {{User|Baby Mario Bloops}} | : :( , that's not helping out with the situation. Maybe you can look for the picture? {{User|Baby Mario Bloops}} | ||
::I found one, It's over there {{User|KS3}} [[ | ::I found one, It's over there {{User|KS3}} [[Image:WigglerBiS.jpg|thumb|right|A picture of Wiggler in Mario and Luigi: Bowser's Inside Story]]<br> | ||
[[ | [[Image:Wiggler_from_ML-BiS.jpg|thumb|right|Another Picture of Wiggler]] | ||
:::We need an actual sprite. {{User|Reversinator}} | :::We need an actual sprite. {{User|Reversinator}} | ||
::::Yes, and my and LGM's vote is still valid, because there IS a construction template and the picture of Wiggler is not good enough. We need Wiggler in its battle stance, without a background. {{User|BabyLuigiOnFire}} | ::::Yes, and my and LGM's vote is still valid, because there IS a construction template and the picture of Wiggler is not good enough. We need Wiggler in its battle stance, without a background. {{User|BabyLuigiOnFire}} | ||
Line 150: | Line 146: | ||
Here are the 3 Images of all the Giant Bosses. There are on the right.{{User|KS3}} | Here are the 3 Images of all the Giant Bosses. There are on the right.{{User|KS3}} | ||
[[ | [[Image:FawfulExpressBiS.jpg|thumb|right|100px|Fawful Express]] | ||
[[ | [[Image:TowerOfYikkBiS.jpg|thumb|right|100px|Tower Of Yikk]] | ||
[[ | [[Image:BowsersCastleBiS.jpg|thumb|right|100px|Bowser's Castle]] | ||
::Lol, I'm sorry, but you forgot Super Peach's Castle boss. {{User|Baby Mario Bloops}} | ::Lol, I'm sorry, but you forgot Super Peach's Castle boss. {{User|Baby Mario Bloops}} | ||
Line 257: | Line 253: | ||
:::::That is different. We are discussing and educating people about these copyrighted characters/games/areas/etc. In using content from the manual word-for-word, we are using someone else's work. You may cite the manual for the plot section's information, but not use it. - [[User:NARCE|NARCE]] 03:24, 15 July 2010 (UTC) | :::::That is different. We are discussing and educating people about these copyrighted characters/games/areas/etc. In using content from the manual word-for-word, we are using someone else's work. You may cite the manual for the plot section's information, but not use it. - [[User:NARCE|NARCE]] 03:24, 15 July 2010 (UTC) | ||
Boss refight can be found by playing all 3 Mario and Luigi game which more than one of us had. first time in Mario Rpg series go here:[[ | Boss refight can be found by playing all 3 Mario and Luigi game which more than one of us had. first time in Mario Rpg series go here:[[Games]]. HAS there been any? Thats very easy to just look up. Since theres only been 7 games. third one, play Superstar Saga. And this is the MARIOWIKI of course people have played the series. Some people have played nearly all the Mario games to date. Also note, that I'm opposing it too, but not for the references | ||
{{User|Booderdash}} | {{User|Booderdash}} | ||
:Some people, not all. Some people come here to learn about Mario. | :Some people, not all. Some people come here to learn about Mario. | ||
Line 389: | Line 385: | ||
:The project sounds fine to me; ''however'', I will have to remove my support vote. I will not oppose, because I think it deserves FA status. {{User|CosmicBlueToad}} | :The project sounds fine to me; ''however'', I will have to remove my support vote. I will not oppose, because I think it deserves FA status. {{User|CosmicBlueToad}} | ||
::We need a archive for this commen section :D. Anyways, I think having the status effect really boost the page, yet I would rather not have it be under construction. So, I think it would be best to view an example or rough draft of what it would look like. But, PLEASE do not post a rough draft right here, as I don't want to scroll down more. Place it on the Talk Page of the article, and then we can decide if we want to add it. {{User|Baby Mario Bloops}} | ::We need a archive for this commen section :D. Anyways, I think having the status effect really boost the page, yet I would rather not have it be under construction. So, I think it would be best to view an example or rough draft of what it would look like. But, PLEASE do not post a rough draft right here, as I don't want to scroll down more. Place it on the Talk Page of the article, and then we can decide if we want to add it. {{User|Baby Mario Bloops}} | ||
:::Yeah, this needs archiving or something. BMB, I understand, so I'll ...um, where should I start creating the SE table? The BIS talkpage? I sy start as I probably won't be able to get it done all at once (I'm a very busy person. Veerrryyy busy. Homework,etc.) {{User | :::Yeah, this needs archiving or something. BMB, I understand, so I'll ...um, where should I start creating the SE table? The BIS talkpage? I sy start as I probably won't be able to get it done all at once (I'm a very busy person. Veerrryyy busy. Homework,etc.) --{{User:Frostyfireyoshi/sig}} 16:41, 14 September 2010 (UTC) | ||