Editing MarioWiki:Featured articles/N1/Bowser
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
__NOTOC__ | __NOTOC__ | ||
===[[{{#titleparts:{{PAGENAME}}||3}}]]=== | ===[[{{#titleparts:{{PAGENAME}}||3}}]]=== | ||
{{ | {{FANOMSTAT | ||
|nominated=3:00, | |nominated=3:00, 23, May 2011 (GMT) | ||
| | |passed=<!--When it is 5-0, put the time (such as 12:10, 11 December 2009) of the fifth support/removal of last oppose by copying it from the history of the page.--> | ||
}} | |||
==== Support ==== | ==== Support ==== | ||
#{{User|Catboy41}} Now, I'm new, so maybe I'm not reading the rules correctly, But I am pretty sure I did, so with that in mind, I think that this article Is AWESOME. I was actually suprised It wasn't featured when I joined. I didn't spot any bad templates, and I believe It should be featured. It's written in correct verb tense, as far as I know. It has a lot of info, and I believe It is indeed, one of the best. | #{{User|Catboy41}} Now, I'm new, so maybe I'm not reading the rules correctly, But I am pretty sure I did, so with that in mind, I think that this article Is AWESOME. I was actually suprised It wasn't featured when I joined. I didn't spot any bad templates, and I believe It should be featured. It's written in correct verb tense, as far as I know. It has a lot of info, and I believe It is indeed, one of the best. | ||
Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
#{{User|Toa 95}} | #{{User|Toa 95}} | ||
#{{User|Bjdill}} | #{{User|Bjdill}} | ||
==== Oppose ==== | ==== Oppose ==== | ||
Line 54: | Line 47: | ||
#{{User|Bobosmith01}} There is many mistakes. Als many wrong verbs and there tenses. If it has one of thse bars...... why should it even be thought of nomination? | #{{User|Bobosmith01}} There is many mistakes. Als many wrong verbs and there tenses. If it has one of thse bars...... why should it even be thought of nomination? | ||
#{{User|KS3}} Is is just me, or do I see two rewrite templates at the top of the page? The Mario Party section also needs expansion. | #{{User|KS3}} Is is just me, or do I see two rewrite templates at the top of the page? The Mario Party section also needs expansion. | ||
#{{User|Commander Code-8}} | #{{User|Commander Code-8}} Per all | ||
#{{User|Spidey665}} '''Strongest Possible Oppose'''. There are wrong verbs and typos on this page, maybe if we'd all get to work on it, it'd help. | #{{User|Spidey665}} '''Strongest Possible Oppose'''. There are wrong verbs and typos on this page, maybe if we'd all get to work on it, it'd help. | ||
#{{User|Enriquevv75}} Per all | #{{User|Enriquevv75}} Per all | ||
#{{User|SuperYoshiBros}} Per DKPetey99 and Goomba's Shoe 15 | #{{User|SuperYoshiBros}} Per DKPetey99 and Goomba's Shoe 15 | ||
#{{User|Propeller Toad}} I'm afraid I'm going to have go with a no here. Aside from the templates and missing sections, Bowser's article also lacks images from most of his appearances (aside from the mainstream Super Mario games). It is crucial to include images in the sections with large amounts of information in order to illustrate Bowser's appearances in these games and media appearances, and by adding this to the fact of the other flaws in this article, I personally do not think Bowser's article is ready to be featured just yet. Essentially per all. | #{{User|Propeller Toad}} I'm afraid I'm going to have go with a no here. Aside from the templates and missing sections, Bowser's article also lacks images from most of his appearances (aside from the mainstream Super Mario games). It is crucial to include images in the sections with large amounts of information in order to illustrate Bowser's appearances in these games and media appearances, and by adding this to the fact of the other flaws in this article, I personally do not think Bowser's article is ready to be featured just yet. Essentially per all. | ||
#{{User|YoshiKong}} | #{{User|YoshiKong}} Per B.wilson. The first thing I see is a rewrite-expand template. | ||
#{{User|Super Famicom 64}} …per all… How in the world a guy can nominate an article with so much less information… and with '''{{ | #{{User|Super Famicom 64}} …per all… How in the world a guy can nominate an article with so much less information… and with '''<nowiki>{{rewrite-expand}}</nowiki>'''?! | ||
#{{User|Kamek126}} I oppose because it's missing data about some of the games and i'm afraid it lacks many images of him from older titles. | #{{User|Kamek126}} I oppose because it's missing data about some of the games and i'm afraid it lacks many images of him from older titles. | ||
==== Removal of Opposes ==== | ==== Removal of Opposes ==== | ||
=====All Opposes===== | =====All Opposes===== | ||
#{{User|New Super Yoshi}} Look how much the article has changed. All of your opposes are now outdated. | #{{User|New Super Yoshi}} Look how much the article has changed. All of your opposes are now outdated. | ||
#{{User|Toa 95}} - | #{{User|Toa 95}} - Rewrite templates gone, not many redlinks, much information has been added, and I think I may have documented all his appearances. | ||
==== Comments ==== | ==== Comments ==== | ||
Line 79: | Line 72: | ||
@DKPetey99... Bowser IS in Hoops 3-on-3! Next time read the whole article before you bother to oppose it! {{User|MysteryGirl2012}} | @DKPetey99... Bowser IS in Hoops 3-on-3! Next time read the whole article before you bother to oppose it! {{User|MysteryGirl2012}} | ||
:He meant that one needs to be added. :B [[User:Lord Grammaticus|Lord Grammaticus]] 15:16, 15 February 2012 (EST) | :He meant that one needs to be added. :B [[User:Lord Grammaticus|Lord Grammaticus]] 15:16, 15 February 2012 (EST) | ||
Even the Mario page has construction going on. {{User:Spidey665/sig}} 17:49, 9 January 2012 (EST) | |||
Even the Mario page has construction going on. {{User | |||
Do we really need another section for ports or remakes? Unless there are major changes in the remakes, it doesn't need to be here.--[[User:Toadshroom|Toadshroom]] 22:47, 18 February 2012 (EST) | Do we really need another section for ports or remakes? Unless there are major changes in the remakes, it doesn't need to be here.--[[User:Toadshroom|Toadshroom]] 22:47, 18 February 2012 (EST) | ||
Line 97: | Line 86: | ||
Also, I seem to have trouble reading through this page in one sitting. I really appreciate the massive amount of information, but it seems kind of overwhelming. I don't know if personal issues should be taken into account. I'm not trying to discourage adding information, by the way. I just want to point this out. {{User|LeftyGreenMario}} | Also, I seem to have trouble reading through this page in one sitting. I really appreciate the massive amount of information, but it seems kind of overwhelming. I don't know if personal issues should be taken into account. I'm not trying to discourage adding information, by the way. I just want to point this out. {{User|LeftyGreenMario}} | ||
:Well, Bowser is a major character who appeared in many games. It's impossible to shorten the article any further other than removing unnecessary fluff. {{User|BabyLuigiOnFire}} | :Well, Bowser is a major character who appeared in many games. It's impossible to shorten the article any further other than removing unnecessary fluff. {{User|BabyLuigiOnFire}} | ||