Editing List of controversies
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 108: | Line 108: | ||
After seeing the success of ''Donkey Kong'' in Japan, Universal attempted to enter the gaming industry by producing a video game with [[wikipedia:Tiger Productions|Tiger Productions]] that starred King Kong and featured similar gameplay. However, in 1981, Nintendo exported ''Donkey Kong'' to the West, where it became famous, selling 60,000 arcade units and earning Nintendo $180 million in profit (from both arcade systems and console ports). This prompted Universal to terminate all contracts with Tiger and threaten to sue Nintendo and various producers of ''Donkey Kong''-related material because "[their] actions falsely suggest to the public that [its] product originates with or is authorized, sponsored or approved by the owner of the King Kong name, character and story." | After seeing the success of ''Donkey Kong'' in Japan, Universal attempted to enter the gaming industry by producing a video game with [[wikipedia:Tiger Productions|Tiger Productions]] that starred King Kong and featured similar gameplay. However, in 1981, Nintendo exported ''Donkey Kong'' to the West, where it became famous, selling 60,000 arcade units and earning Nintendo $180 million in profit (from both arcade systems and console ports). This prompted Universal to terminate all contracts with Tiger and threaten to sue Nintendo and various producers of ''Donkey Kong''-related material because "[their] actions falsely suggest to the public that [its] product originates with or is authorized, sponsored or approved by the owner of the King Kong name, character and story." | ||
Coleco and Atari, the producers of the game's early computer and home console ports, promptly settled and offered to pay three percent of all profits made from the game and its production. Nintendo, however, refused to settle. On June 29, 1982, Universal officially sued Nintendo. In 1983, Universal ordered cease-and-desist letters be sent to all of Nintendo's | Coleco and Atari, the producers of the game's early computer and home console ports, promptly settled and offered to pay three percent of all profits made from the game and its production. Nintendo, however, refused to settle. On June 29, 1982, Universal officially sued Nintendo. In 1983, Universal ordered cease-and-desist letters be sent to all of Nintendo's licenses, ordering that the companies stop production and obtain licenses from Universal before resuming. Nintendo later agreed to appear in court and was represented by {{wp|John Kirby (attorney)|John Kirby}}, whereas Universal Studios opted to be represented by a New York law firm. The trial lasted for one week, and was overseen by Judge {{wp|Robert W. Sweet}}. | ||
During the trial, Universal alleged that based on surveys of amusement arcades (conducted by Universal itself), at least eighteen percent of people believed that ''Donkey Kong'' was related to King Kong. Universal believed that the similar appearance and the shared use of the second name "Kong" was the basis for the confusion. Among other claims, Universal also protested that the game's similar story was a direct infringement of the ''King Kong'' movies' plot. | During the trial, Universal alleged that based on surveys of amusement arcades (conducted by Universal itself), at least eighteen percent of people believed that ''Donkey Kong'' was related to King Kong. Universal believed that the similar appearance and the shared use of the second name "Kong" was the basis for the confusion. Among other claims, Universal also protested that the game's similar story was a direct infringement of the ''King Kong'' movies' plot. |