Editing Category talk:Villains
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
== Delete this category == | == Delete this category == | ||
{{ | {{SettledTPP}} | ||
{{ | {{ProposalOutcome|passed|10-1|delete}} | ||
So, with the surge of [[Special:Contributions/SafariKid2|this guy's edits]] revolving around adding this category to various enemies, I asked myself: "What's the point of this category?" A definition of a villain would be literally any sentient being that opposes the hero. [[Bowser]] definitely falls in this category, but what about [[Bob-omb]] and [[Thwomp]], who appear to be animated objects, or [[Ganondorf]] and [[Metal Face]], who have little bearing on the ''Mario'' universe. imo, the description "Villains in the ''Mario'' franchise" is too broad to really be of anything useful. [[:Category:Enemies]], [[:Category:Bosses]], and their respective sub-categories work just fine, and are better defined, so I really see no reason to keep this. (Yes, I see the above conversation, but that doesn't seem to have concluded properly and doesn't impact my thoughts on this unnecessary category.) | So, with the surge of [[Special:Contributions/SafariKid2|this guy's edits]] revolving around adding this category to various enemies, I asked myself: "What's the point of this category?" A definition of a villain would be literally any sentient being that opposes the hero. [[Bowser]] definitely falls in this category, but what about [[Bob-omb]] and [[Thwomp]], who appear to be animated objects, or [[Ganondorf]] and [[Metal Face]], who have little bearing on the ''Mario'' universe. imo, the description "Villains in the ''Mario'' franchise" is too broad to really be of anything useful. [[:Category:Enemies]], [[:Category:Bosses]], and their respective sub-categories work just fine, and are better defined, so I really see no reason to keep this. (Yes, I see the above conversation, but that doesn't seem to have concluded properly and doesn't impact my thoughts on this unnecessary category.) | ||