Editing Category talk:Mushrooms
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 54: | Line 54: | ||
===Use the Fungicide(Oppose)=== | ===Use the Fungicide(Oppose)=== | ||
#{{User|Arend}} Per Waluigi Time. The initial proposed name for the new category doesn't work because there's many entities that are mushrooms (and even have "Mushroom" in their name) that apparently "do not fit the criteria" since they don't have the Super Mushroom design, so calling it simply "Mushrooms" while renaming this one WILL cause a LOT of confusion, and the second proposed name "Super Mushrooms" doesn't work when you realize [[Mushroom]] is a thing in multiple games which shares that very same design. I have tried suggesting alternate solutions such as introducing {{fake link|Category:Mushroom power-ups}} (similar to [[:Category:Flower power-ups]]) and {{fake link|Category:Mushroom items}} (which I personally think are fine solutions), but people in the comments ''still'' aren't satisfied with this because of other things that have the Super Mushroom design that are neither power-up nor item; and at this point, they just want a category of any subject with JUST the Super Mushroom design, which just is not going to be categorizable in a way that will satisfy either side, if the comment section indicates anything. So for now, this is just too cumbersome for me. | |||
<s>#{{User|Waluigi Time}} I understand the idea behind this proposal, and it's not a bad one, but I don't think the proposed implementation is very clear. A category should generally be what it says on the tin, and just calling it "Mushrooms" isn't very intuitive for readers or editors about what the scope of the category actually is when it excludes other subjects that are still mushrooms. '''EDIT:''' The "Super Mushrooms" name is arguably a step in the right direction, but I'm still not sure if it's an accurate representation of the material. Yes, these subjects do share design elements with the Super Mushroom, but does that mean they ''are'' Super Mushroom variants or is that just the design language Nintendo prefers when making mushrooms? (See also [[:Category:Flower power-ups]], most of these share some design elements with Fire Flowers and are almost certainly conceptually derived from them, but would calling them Fire Flowers be accurate or is that just how Nintendo likes to design power-ups that are also flowers?) If we can get some official statements to back that up, I'd be open to it.</s> | |||
===Fungitastic Comments=== | ===Fungitastic Comments=== |